- #1
megacal
- 82
- 16
Universal mass <<<< than a proton?
Of all the models and theories that are being tossed about as fact,
the one that I have the most trouble with is that:
prior to the Big Bang, ALL mass...the Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and the mere 5% that comprises all the visible structures...stars, galaxies, gas, etc was packed into an infinitely small volume<<<<<< than a proton!? =O
Is that just an assumption when we extrapolate backwards in time?
Is it not possible that the volume was more reasonable, e.g. the Milky Way, still an incredibly
tiny volume to contain the mass of the entire universe?
I did a search about "singularity" but don't see an answer to my question.
Thanks,
Cal
Of all the models and theories that are being tossed about as fact,
the one that I have the most trouble with is that:
prior to the Big Bang, ALL mass...the Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and the mere 5% that comprises all the visible structures...stars, galaxies, gas, etc was packed into an infinitely small volume<<<<<< than a proton!? =O
Is that just an assumption when we extrapolate backwards in time?
Is it not possible that the volume was more reasonable, e.g. the Milky Way, still an incredibly
tiny volume to contain the mass of the entire universe?
I did a search about "singularity" but don't see an answer to my question.
Thanks,
Cal