Is There a Weak Repulsive Force of Empty Space in the Universe?

In summary: Yes, the expansion of space will eventually lead to the formation of voids. Once a void exists it will inevitably grow larger because of the expansion flow.
  • #1
jadrian
143
0
when i see 3d images of the webbed shaped structure of the universe, such as clusters and strands, the strands meeting in superclusters, i can't get away from how identical this looks to a reduced dimension view of the upwelling of water after a wave crashes. the foam from the ocean, which you could regard as matter, goes with the flow away from the upwelling water and accumulates in rings where downwelling occurs, and where the strands and rings of foam meet up, there are the largest accumlations of foam in the largest downwelling areas. the foam accummulations in the downwelling zones seems apparently identical to the strands and rings and (in 3d, webs) of matter that are observed in the universe.

so is it possible that empty space on a very large scale has a weakly repulsive force that forces matter in the universe to form rings of matter encircling these cosmic voids the same way upwelling pushes foam in ocean waves to form strands rings in downwelling zones which encircle the upwelling zones?

also, is this possible repulsivity of empty space explain the weakness of gravity, because this effect only seems to appear in cosmic voids where there is an extreme volume of empty space, the effect being that the cosmic voids repel matter to the outskirts to form strands of galaxies and webbed rings surrounding the cosmic voids.

also, could the weakness of gravity and the weakness of this supposed repulsive force of result in a zero sum? ie meaning gravity and empty space repulsivity cancel each other out?

also could this repulsivity of empty space account for the universes accelleration of expansion?

im posting this picture to help with the visualization of upwelling and downwelling in water which causes divergence as well as convergence on the surface.

http://www.redmap.org.au/uploads/image/upwelling-downwelling%20figure%20350.jpg
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2


Extract from the Wiki page on dark energy
This accelerating expansion effect is sometimes labeled "gravitational repulsion", which is a colorful but possibly confusing expression. In fact a negative pressure does not influence the gravitational interaction between masses—which remains attractive—but rather alters the overall evolution of the universe at the cosmological scale, typically resulting in the accelerating expansion of the universe despite the attraction among the masses present in the universe.

I don't know whether this fits what you are proposing I think the above scenario could fit the observed structure. Certainly, some degree of 'clumping' would happen with the clumps moving apart in the expansion flow.
 
  • #3


A similar thought occurred to me a while ago, but I was inspired more by the convection cells seen in a simmering pan of water or in pictures of the surface of the Sun. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh–Bénard_convection . These cells self organise into a stable honeycomb pattern which is most clearly seen in the patterns left in the mud of a pond that has dried up. I too wondered if there was something upwelling in the voids of space and sinking in the borders of the voids giving rise to the strings and walls of stars and galaxies seen in the 3D organisation of space and if there was any connection to the expansion of space.
 
  • #5


jadrian said:
foam

There's a series of videos on youtube called "Sixty Symbols". In one, a physicist talks about the appearance of repeating patterns in nature, such as those formed by dried mud cracking. I don't recall the title or the other examples but I'm pretty sure he brings up the pattern of filaments in it.
 
  • #6


Mentz114 said:
Extract from the Wiki page on dark energy


I don't know whether this fits what you are proposing I think the above scenario could fit the observed structure. Certainly, some degree of 'clumping' would happen with the clumps moving apart in the expansion flow.

so in your view is there a weak repulsive force of empty space?
because these voids only occur on a truly gigantic scale, it makes me feel that there must be a very weak repulsivity of massless space. otherwize i thinnk you would find voids on a smaller scale throughout the universe
 
  • #7


jadrian said:
so in your view is there a weak repulsive force of empty space?
because these voids only occur on a truly gigantic scale, it makes me feel that there must be a very weak repulsivity of massless space. otherwize i thinnk you would find voids on a smaller scale throughout the universe

No, I don't hold the view that there is a weak repulsive force of empty space. It does not seem necessary to invoke such a thing to explain observations.

Once a void exists it will inevitably grow larger because of the expansion flow.

The paper and other link given by atyy above are a good starting point.
 

1. Can gravity alone explain the existence of the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure of the universe?

No, gravity alone cannot fully account for the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure of the universe. While gravity is a major force that shapes the large-scale structure of the universe, other factors such as the distribution of matter and dark energy also play a significant role.

2. How does gravity contribute to the formation of the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure?

Gravity is responsible for pulling matter together, creating clumps and filaments of galaxies. This results in the formation of voids, which are areas with significantly less matter and therefore weaker gravitational pull.

3. What other factors besides gravity contribute to the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure?

The distribution of matter, which is influenced by dark matter and dark energy, also plays a crucial role in shaping the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure of the universe. Dark matter is thought to make up about 85% of the total matter in the universe and its gravity helps to hold galaxies and clusters together. Dark energy, on the other hand, is believed to be the driving force behind the expansion of the universe.

4. Are there any other theories besides gravity that attempt to explain the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure?

Yes, there are other theories such as inflation, which suggests that the early universe underwent a rapid expansion, resulting in the formation of the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure we see today. There are also theories that propose the existence of exotic particles or modifications to the laws of gravity to explain the structure.

5. Can we observe the effects of gravity on the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure?

Yes, we can observe the effects of gravity on the webbed/strand/cosmic void structure through various methods such as mapping the distribution of galaxies and measuring their velocities. These observations provide evidence for the role of gravity in shaping the structure of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
913
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top