Proving square root of 2 is irrational with well ordering principle?

In summary, the conversation discusses using the well ordering principle to prove that the square root of 2 is irrational. The proof relies on assuming that the square root of 2 is rational and then showing that it leads to a contradiction. The well ordering principle is only applicable to subsets of natural numbers, so if it does not hold for the square root of 2, it means that the square root of 2 is not a natural number. This, in turn, proves that the square root of 2 is irrational.
  • #1
symaticc
2
0

Homework Statement


I know how to prove that square root of 2 is irrational using the well ordering principle but what I'm wondering is, how can we use the well ordering principle to prove this when the square root of two isn't even a subset of the natural numbers? Doesn't the well ordering principle only hold for natural numbers and not rational numbers? If we prove that the well ordering principle does not hold for the square root of 2, aren't we just proving that the square root of 2 is not a natural number?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you include the proof here?? Where exactly did you use well-ordering of rational numbers??
 
  • #3
Okay so what I did was first, assume that square root of 2 is rational. let √2 = a/b
2 = a^2/b^2
2b^2 = a^2
a^2 is even therefore a is even so it can be written as 2n...
2b^2 = (2n)^2
2b^b = 4n^2
b^2 = 2n^2
2 = b^2 / n^2
√2 = b/n
Since we started with √2 = a/b and then got √2 = b/n where b/n < a/b, if we repeat the step above and keep repeating it, we will always get smaller representations of √2 which means that there is no smallest element and there for √2 is irrational by the well ordering principle which states that every non-empty subset of N has a least element.

Im wondering, if the well ordering principle is only for subsets of N and it doesn't hold for √2, doesn't that just mean that √2 is not a natural number? How does that prove that √2 is irrational?
 
  • #4
By definition, a set S is well ordered if every non-empty subset of S contains a least element. The set of positive rational numbers is not well-ordered because, for example,

[tex]\{\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, \dots \}[/tex]

has no least element.

I take it that you've been asked to prove that [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] is irrational by using the well ordering property of the positive integers. Here's a hint to get you started. Assume that [itex]\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b}[/itex] where a and b are positive integers. Thus, [itex]b\sqrt{2} = a[/itex] is a positive integer. This implies that the set S, defined by

[tex]S = \{n \in \mathbb{N} : n\sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{N}\}[/tex]

is non-empty. What does the well ordering principle tell you about S?
 

1. What is the well ordering principle?

The well ordering principle states that every non-empty subset of positive integers has a least element. In other words, any set of positive integers must have a smallest or first element.

2. How does the well ordering principle help in proving the irrationality of the square root of 2?

Using the well ordering principle, we can assume that the square root of 2 is a rational number (can be expressed as a ratio of two integers). We can then use this assumption to create a contradiction and prove that the square root of 2 is in fact irrational.

3. Can you explain the proof of the irrationality of the square root of 2 using the well ordering principle?

The proof begins by assuming that the square root of 2 is rational, and can be expressed as a/b, where a and b are integers with no common factors. By squaring both sides, we get 2 = a^2/b^2. This means that a^2 is even, and therefore a must also be even. Substituting 2k for a, we get (2k)^2 = 2b^2, which simplifies to 2k^2 = b^2. This means that b^2 is also even, and therefore b must also be even. This contradicts our initial assumption that a and b have no common factors, since they are both divisible by 2. This proves that the square root of 2 cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers, and is therefore irrational.

4. Why is the well ordering principle important in this proof?

The well ordering principle is important because it helps us to create a contradiction by assuming that the square root of 2 is rational. Without this assumption, we would not be able to prove the irrationality of the square root of 2 using this method.

5. Are there other ways to prove the irrationality of the square root of 2?

Yes, there are other ways to prove the irrationality of the square root of 2, such as using the method of infinite descent or the proof by contradiction. However, the proof using the well ordering principle is a commonly used and accepted method in mathematics.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
495
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
19K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top