What factors determine the length of fuel cycles in nuclear reactors?

  • Thread starter tony.almeda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fuel
In summary: PWR or IRIS reactorThere are several factors that go into cycle length, but overall it is up to the utility company to decide. The PWR cycle length varies depending on the plant type, but on average it is around 18 months.
  • #1
tony.almeda
3
0
1- i have a proplem to understand the meaning of the once & twice burned fuel,
and why we use when we going to simulate the whole core

2- is there a specific formula for the IFBA radius,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Once-burned fuel = fuel with one cycle of operation
Twice-burned = fuel with two cycles of operation

What does one mean by IFBA radius?

IFBA fuel has a coating of ZrB2 on the periphery of the fuel pellets. It depletes during the first cycle.

Fuel assemblies are often scatter-loaded in a checkerboard pattern, although modern core designs may have fresh fuel loaded side-by-side with the appropriate reactivity hold-down (IFBA or IFBA+BPA). Fresh and once-burned fuel are set in-board and twice-burned are placed on the periphery.
 
  • #3
but what is the length of each cycle(once burned& twicw burned) for PWR or IRIS reactor
 
  • #4
tony.almeda said:
but what is the length of each cycle(once burned& twicw burned) for PWR or IRIS reactor

Cycle length can vary, and is established by the utility company operating the plant. Typical PWR cycle is 18 months, though some run 24 months. In the old days most (?) ran 12 months. It's an economic decision that has as much to do with timing the outages relative to the other power stations in the utility's system, as the physics.
 
  • #5
tony.almeda said:
but what is the length of each cycle(once burned& twicw burned) for PWR or IRIS reactor
Like gmax137 indicated, it's variable, and it depends on the particular operating philosophy of the utility.

More or less, cycle length is whatever one wants it to be - subject to some technical constraints.

Many BWRs and many of the moderately rated PWRs (usually 14x14 and 15x15 fueled plants) have adopted 24 month cycles. Some utilities have opted for high capacity 18-month cycles.

High duty PWR plants with 16x16 and 17x17 fuel run 18-month cycles, but one plant runs 19-20-21 month cycles due to their rather unique circumstances.

Besides efpd, capacity factor (CF) and outage length, other factors for consideration include batch size, enrichment and burnable poison loading (reactivity hold-down).
 

1. What is "once & twice burned fuel"?

"Once & twice burned fuel" refers to the process of reusing the same fuel source multiple times after it has been used in a previous cycle. This is commonly seen in nuclear power plants where the same fuel rods are used multiple times before being replaced.

2. How does the "once & twice burned fuel" process work?

The "once & twice burned fuel" process involves taking used nuclear fuel rods and reprocessing them to remove any remaining usable fuel. The remaining fuel is then used in a second cycle. This process can be repeated multiple times, with each cycle using less and less of the remaining fuel until it is no longer usable.

3. What are the benefits of using "once & twice burned fuel"?

The main benefit of using "once & twice burned fuel" is that it allows for the reuse of a limited resource. By reprocessing and reusing fuel, we can extend the lifespan of our current fuel supply and reduce the need for new fuel. It also produces less waste compared to using only once-burned fuel.

4. Are there any risks associated with "once & twice burned fuel"?

While the process of reusing fuel can have environmental benefits, there are also potential risks involved. The reprocessing of fuel can release radioactive materials into the environment, and there is always a risk of accidents or leaks during transportation or storage of the fuel. However, these risks can be minimized through proper safety measures and regulations.

5. Is "once & twice burned fuel" a sustainable solution for energy production?

The use of "once & twice burned fuel" can be considered a more sustainable solution compared to using only once-burned fuel. It allows for the reuse of a limited resource and reduces the need for new fuel. However, it is not a completely sustainable solution as the fuel will eventually run out and there are still concerns about the environmental impact of reprocessing and storing the fuel.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
12K
Back
Top