Can a Wind Turbine Improve the Efficiency of a Moving Car?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of attaching a wind turbine connected to a generator to a moving car in order to extract energy from the air flowing around the car. It is debated whether this is possible, economical, and practical. Some argue that it would create a loss in overall efficiency, while others suggest it could be used for small tasks such as recharging a cell phone. However, it is ultimately concluded that this idea is not practical as the energy given to the turbine would be greater than the output of the turbine.
  • #36
In fact in a movie, i think it was air force one or something... they show an apu( aux power unit) that pops out with a turbine on it, when the aircraft has a loss of power for some reason.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
Yes, that was mentioned earlier in the thread. It works great, but it does add drag.
 
  • #38
What you yourself mentioned, Russ, is worth repeating.
When it's an aeroplane large enough that cable-type manual backup isn't feasible, it's certainly a smart move to trade off glide distance for controllability. It would be useless to glide half-way around the planet if you're upside-down and ass-first when you get there. I'd rather sacrifice a few kilometres and land on the wheels.
 
  • #39
Dieseltwitch said:
In fact in a movie, i think it was air force one or something... they show an apu( aux power unit) that pops out with a turbine on it, when the aircraft has a loss of power for some reason.

Its called a Ram Air Turbine (RAT), I used to work on them. As Danger eluded to its purpose it to allow control of the aircraft during an emergency glide.
 
  • #40
If you do similar considerations, including car drag, transmission loss, and account for non-ideality of the rotor, you still actually end up with a wind car that could go faster than the free stream velocity in the upwind direction.
But I don't think such a car is built.

Such a car has been build at the Delft University of Technology. It worked. One of the important aerodynamic aspects of using wind energy is the LIFT principle. When a horizontal axis windturbine has wing-shaped rotorblades it will be able to rotate faster than the windspeed. This means a higher efficiency than drag-based windturbines.

However even with drag-based windturbines such a vehicle can be build. The drag of the vehicle should be minimized as much as possible. EXAMPLE: http://www.zeiltheorie.nl/wagentje.html
 
  • #41
You could get a propeller to generate electrical energy however you would have exert more effort to keep the car at the same speed as there is now more drag, so you would probably end up burning as much fuel in your engine as you would produce with the turbine.
 
  • #42
Sjonnie said:
Such a car has been build at the Delft University of Technology. It worked. One of the important aerodynamic aspects of using wind energy is the LIFT principle. When a horizontal axis windturbine has wing-shaped rotorblades it will be able to rotate faster than the windspeed. This means a higher efficiency than drag-based windturbines.

However even with drag-based windturbines such a vehicle can be build. The drag of the vehicle should be minimized as much as possible. EXAMPLE: http://www.zeiltheorie.nl/wagentje.html


Yes. The final results from the theory I stated in my first post only apply to (ideal) lift based wind turbines.
However, the equation for determining the top speed
P/V=T
is always valid when neglecting drag on the rest of the car, rolling resistance and mechanical loss in the teansmission.
Including these contributions the equilibrium equation for determination of the top speed would look like this:
EtaMech*P/V=T+Dcar+RollResist
EtaMech is due to mechanical loss in the transmissin, Dcar is the car drag (~Vrel^2) and RollResist is the rolling resistance of f the car.
The interesting thing here is that from this expression it can be seen that any wind energy converter can make a car go in the upwind direction (as long as the power production is above zero), since the left hand side term can be as big as we want it to if the (car) velocity is low enough.
So it will move upstream with any wind energy conversion system. The question is how fast. One important parameter in that is the relationship between P and T, and this is much better for lift based conversion systems than for drag based, as you mentioned.

The link you supplied was fun.
Do you have any links for the Delft University wind turbine car?

-Mac G
 
  • #43
I have an idea, put on a geek propellor hat with a turbine, then an inverter that charges your cell phone, ride your bike to generate wind.. Oh, I think dilbert has already invented that.

:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44
The air flowing around the car is not what is turning the turbine because there is no air flowing around the car unless the wind is blowing. Luckily aerodynamic force does not require air to actually flow around an object, it only requires a difference in velocity between the object and the sometimes still air (relative airflow). The relative airflow in this situation is caused by the linear motion of the object through the air as well as the motion of the object while in the air (rotation). This is important because to determine aerodynamic force you must first determine the direction of relative airflow that caused it.

Drag can spin any wind turbine but if this is a lift based horizontal axis wind turbine similar to a propeller, the same lift that causes it to spin can greatly (depending on its speed of spin) oppose its forward linear motion. The more the blades spin the more the relative airflow starts to change to a direction more opposite the direction of spin and subsequently the increasing lift starts to tilt more rearward opposit the direction of its linear motion.

Drag is not defined as the aerodynamic force that opposes forward motion. Oh wait a minute that’s the way it’s defined in aeronautic texts books, this may be the reason pilots do not know the difference between lift and drag.
 
  • #45
Roy Dale said:
The air flowing around the car is not what is turning the turbine because there is no air flowing around the car unless the wind is blowing. Luckily aerodynamic force does not require air to actually flow around an object, it only requires a difference in velocity between the object and the sometimes still air (relative airflow). The relative airflow in this situation is caused by the linear motion of the object through the air as well as the motion of the object while in the air (rotation). This is important because to determine aerodynamic force you must first determine the direction of relative airflow that caused it.

Drag can spin any wind turbine but if this is a lift based horizontal axis wind turbine similar to a propeller, the same lift that causes it to spin can greatly (depending on its speed of spin) oppose its forward linear motion. The more the blades spin the more the relative airflow starts to change to a direction more opposite the direction of spin and subsequently the increasing lift starts to tilt more rearward opposit the direction of its linear motion.

Drag is not defined as the aerodynamic force that opposes forward motion. Oh wait a minute that’s the way it’s defined in aeronautic texts books, this may be the reason pilots do not know the difference between lift and drag.


I'm no rocket scientist, but what about a dual set of counter-rotating blades on the same axis? Wouldn't the effect of two sets of blades spinning in opposite directions be to cancel out the lift caused by one set of rotating blades?
 
  • #46
I thought is good idea, because that is make like aeroplan, make you car have big power, less to use petrol, if you use wind turbine, that is make your car moving slow, in front your car have big drag force. like aero have big lift force to help plane to move to up but for renew energy you can try that, i have one e-book about wind turbine handbook, if you want to know you can download that in scribd.com. maybe the book can help you analyze factor and fabrication wind turbine.that is not econoical because you must add new compenet to connection wind energy with your car. thanks,


irian
ym : iriansyahputra
blog : http://irianpoo.blogspot.com/" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #47
irian said:
I thought is good idea, because that is make like aeroplan, make you car have big power, less to use petrol, if you use wind turbine, that is make your car moving slow, in front your car have big drag force. like aero have big lift force to help plane to move to up but for renew energy you can try that, i have one e-book about wind turbine handbook, if you want to know you can download that in scribd.com. maybe the book can help you analyze factor and fabrication wind turbine.that is not econoical because you must add new compenet to connection wind energy with your car. thanks,


irian
ym : iriansyahputra
blog : http://irianpoo.blogspot.com/" [Broken]
It will not work no matter how you slice it. The turbine spins by the force of air flowing through it. The reactive force of the turbine pushes back on the air. This creates drag. your vehicle will need to work harder in proportion to how much extra drag is placed on it.

The only energy you will generate with the wind turbine is that which is generated by the engine working harder. What you've got there is a rather inefficient device that converts gasoline into electricity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #48
I say not to punch a hole in the car. I ask what if you take the surface that is resisting on the car and you take that resistence away to replace it with a turbine? That causes the same amount of resistence that it had orignally
 
Last edited:
  • #49
DaveC426913 said:
It will not work no matter how you slice it. The turbine spins by the force of air flowing through it. The reactive force of the turbine pushes back on the air. This creates drag. your vehicle will need to work harder in proportion to how much extra drag is placed on it.

The only energy you will generate with the wind turbine is that which is generated by the engine working harder. What you've got there is a rather inefficient device that converts gasoline into electricity.

If you slice a pickup truck into the equation it might work.

I think a bank of small turbines, placed behind and below the rear window of a pickup truck would both generate power and reduce the aerodynamic drag of the vehicle.

Imagine the following vehicle, and rather than the shell, a set of small wind turbines laid out in the same basic shape.

pknox_toyota.jpg



Personally, this idea would not be economically feasible to either construct or install, as 90% of my commutes are at speeds of between zero and 35 mph. But someone who spent 90% of their time at freeway speeds in a pickup truck would notice an improvement.

But then again, the shell from the picture above would probably do the same thing, at 1/100th the cost.
 
  • #50
lightyears said:
I say not to punch a hole in the car. I ask what if you take the surface that is resisting on the car and you take that resistence away to replace it with a turbine? That causes the same amount of resistence that it had orignally
No, it doesn't happen like that
 
  • #51
i read in an article that, if we channel the wind to the generator, it will increase drag force to the car. so, the car's speed will decrease.
I also doing research about wind energy.
Are you doing this research?

The_Thinker said:
If supposing we were to add a wind turbine connected to a generator to a moving car, would we be able to get the air flowing around the car to turn the turbine and therefore gain some energy? If it is possible, is it economical? if it is, is it practical? would there be a loss? would there be any gain in overall efficiency??

A friend of mine wants to do this project for collage and wants to implement this idea... I just want to know if it is practical or not...

So... what do you guys think?
 
  • #52
OmCheeto said:
If you slice a pickup truck into the equation it might work.

I think a bank of small turbines, placed behind and below the rear window of a pickup truck would both generate power and reduce the aerodynamic drag of the vehicle.
Still no.

In order for the turbines to generate power, they must produce drag.
 
  • #53
DaveC426913 said:
Still no.

In order for the turbines to generate power, they must produce drag.

True. But the design of trucks is so dreadfully bad in the first place, I can't imagine something streamlining the back end, not making the vehicle more efficient, even a bunch of mini-turbines.

But as I think I implied in my previous post, simply making the vehicle more aerodynamic is much more economical. And I should probably add now, that it is the only logical solution.

The article associated with the image of the truck I posted, stated that the gas mileage went from 25 to 32 mpg @ 70 mph, a 28% improvement. I agree with you that a slew of mini-me turbines, strategically placed, would probably not come close to generating such an improvement.
 
  • #54
OmCheeto said:
True. But the design of trucks is so dreadfully bad in the first place, I can't imagine something streamlining the back end, not making the vehicle more efficient, even a bunch of mini-turbines.
Adding wind turbines the the back end of a truck does not make it more streamlined, it makes it less streamlined (as was already said). Adding a turbine to anything makes it have more drag than it had before you added the turbine.
 
  • #55
I was thinking about this last night.
Surely a wind turbine on top of a car as it travels at speed would generate free energy.
Even if it only powers 20% of the car, this would be a great success for our planet.

I think it is definitely possible. One of us just needs to design it and show the formulas to prove it would be more fuel efficient. 'The energy is in the wind'
 
  • #56
dec2012omg said:
I think it is definitely possible. One of us just needs to design it and show the formulas to prove it would be more fuel efficient. 'The energy is in the wind'

The point is that the formulas have been determined a long time ago. They are basic and clear. You can't get something for nothing. If you get power from the wind, it ultimately came from the power that you put in via gasoline.
 
  • #57
It would yield a net loss in energy.

Remember this golden rule:
When searching for efficiency, anything that affects the thing you want will yield a net loss.We are using an engine to push the car forward, the point is that using this motion to power a wind turbine will take speed fromthe motion, meaning the engine has to work harder to push the car forward.

engine > motion > wind turbine

As you can see adding a wind tubine to a car is basically just powered by the egine enyway.

However if you had a wind tubine that operated only when the engine was not causing motion (going down a large hill say) THEN you would get a gain.

TO get "free" energy (you don't get something for nothing), you need to get it from things that would otherside be thrown away.w Which is why adding a tubine to the exhaust would work.
 
  • #58
dec2012omg said:
I was thinking about this last night.
Surely a wind turbine on top of a car as it travels at speed would generate free energy.
Even if it only powers 20% of the car, this would be a great success for our planet.

I think it is definitely possible. One of us just needs to design it and show the formulas to prove it would be more fuel efficient. 'The energy is in the wind'
Welcome to PF. I'm not sure how to explain it any clearer than it already has. The wind moves a wind turbine by appying a force to it in the direction the wind is moving. In other words, for a wind turbine on top of the a car moving forward, the wind pushes it backwards -- slowing the car.
 
  • #59
OK so the turbine causes drag, but you have the momentum of the car so maybe you would get a slight overall net gain of energy i.e. enough to power a mobile phone...?
 
  • #60
DaveC426913 said:
Still no.

In order for the turbines to generate power, they must produce drag.

yeah but you have the momentum of th vehicle so doesn't this more than counteract the drag?
 
  • #61
Read the above.

If you take energy from something useful. You LOSE!

Ie it would be more energy efficient to simply use the electricity generated by the engine.

engine > altenator > phone
engine > motion > wind tubine > phone.

It adds more steps the energy has to take when ultimately it comes form the same source.
 
  • #62
xxChrisxx said:
Read the above.

If you take energy from something useful. You LOSE!

Ie it would be more energy efficient to simply use the electricity generated by the engine.

engine > altenator > phone
engine > motion > wind tubine > phone.

It adds more steps the energy has to take when ultimately it comes form the same source.

Yup. pr0nChrispr0n is right. It's all coming from the gasoline anyway. Why put more steps in between? You've already got a source of electricity.
 
  • #63
DaveC426913 said:
pr0nChrispr0n

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
  • #64
pronjay said:
OK so the turbine causes drag, but you have the momentum of the car so maybe you would get a slight overall net gain of energy i.e. enough to power a mobile phone...?
Momentum isn't energy.
yeah but you have the momentum of th vehicle so doesn't this more than counteract the drag?
Momentum isn't force either.

Please understand: we aren't saying that the turbine doesn't generate energy, we are just saying that the turbine steals that energy from the car's engine.
 
  • #65
i agree...you can not get something for nothing ...what you can do to improve things is to capture and utilize the high temperatures produced by the IC..both antifreeze in the cooling system and waste exhaust.. this is going to waste and..the drag produced by radiator opening could be reduced/eliminated to up the MPG.
there it is...available energy in the form of heat..going to the atmosphere...convert this and you got the ticket!
 
  • #66
hmmm..."turbine on the exhaust"...
what about perm magnets on the intake turbocharger rotor

"antifreeze in the cooling system and waste exhaust"
big peltier device to change heat transfer to electricity

(from my understanding with an engineer here that worked with peltier devices they will produce electricity from temp transfer, although not as effieient as power into transfer heat)

given as much as most cars sit vs drive, the wind turbine would work good with a "docking station" for the hybred car

just not a good idea on the car at speed

dr
 
  • #67
dr dodge said:
hmmm..."turbine on the exhaust"...
Would cause back-pressure on the exhaust system.
dr dodge said:
what about perm magnets on the intake turbocharger rotor
You're expending energy getting the thing up to speed, then you're going to steal that energy for somewhere else?

You're not thinking critically. You're just pointing at components and asking if it's possible to tap energy from them.

dr dodge said:
given as much as most cars sit vs drive, the wind turbine would work good with a "docking station" for the hybred car
dr
OK, stick one on your roof then. If there's access to the grid (which is why there's a docking station there) then there's no point to attaching a wind turbine at the docking station. Attach it somewhere in the grid that's more efficient for function and just have wired into the grid.

The whole point of what we're talking about is devices on the car when you don't have access to recharging or refueling.
 
  • #68
dr dodge said:
hmmm..."turbine on the exhaust"...
Like a turbocharger...? Or you could use the turbine directly to power a generator.
what about perm magnets on the intake turbocharger rotor
Yes, but it is already an energy recovery device, so you probably don't gain any more by doing this.
"antifreeze in the cooling system and waste exhaust"
If you mean waste heat recovery then yes.
big peltier device to change heat transfer to electricity

(from my understanding with an engineer here that worked with peltier devices they will produce electricity from temp transfer, although not as effieient as power into transfer heat)
Correct.
given as much as most cars sit vs drive, the wind turbine would work good with a "docking station" for the hybred car

just not a good idea on the car at speed

dr
Correct.
 
  • #69
DaveC426913 said:
Would cause back-pressure on the exhaust system.
Yes, but the gain is greater than the loss. Turbochargers do, in fact, improve efficiency for a given power output.
You're expending energy getting the thing up to speed, then you're going to steal that energy for somewhere else?

You're not thinking critically. You're just pointing at components and asking if it's possible to tap energy from them.
A turbocharger is already an energy recovery device - he's just thinking of other ways to use it.
 
  • #70
DaveC426913 said:
Would cause back-pressure on the exhaust system.

You can tune around the loss, exhausts acutally need 'back pressure' to work correctly and allow tuning. A turbine generating electricity is only the same as a turbocharger, in terms of how it affects the exhaust.

On the whole a turbocharger is better than a turbine, because increasing the spcific output of the engine is more useful that lots of electricity generation. From a cost vs outcome perspetive. Making the engine produce the same power at a lower specific fuel consumption is more effective than adding batteries and trying to do a hybrid system.

This is the reason for the current trend in engine downsizing, improved efficiency with no appreaciable power and performance loss. Made especially juicy by variable turbo geometry reducing/eliminating lag problems.

I guess you could add a low pass turbine at the end of the exhaust system, just to try to steal that last bit for electiricty generation.
 
<h2>1. Can a wind turbine really improve the efficiency of a moving car?</h2><p>Yes, a wind turbine can improve the efficiency of a moving car by generating electricity that can be used to power the car's electrical systems, reducing the load on the engine and improving fuel efficiency.</p><h2>2. How does a wind turbine on a car work?</h2><p>A wind turbine on a car works by harnessing the kinetic energy of the moving air and converting it into electricity. The turbine is usually mounted on the roof or hood of the car and is connected to a generator that produces electricity.</p><h2>3. What are the potential benefits of using a wind turbine on a car?</h2><p>The potential benefits of using a wind turbine on a car include improved fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, and cost savings on fuel. It can also provide a backup power source in case of a battery failure or emergency.</p><h2>4. Are there any limitations to using a wind turbine on a car?</h2><p>Yes, there are some limitations to using a wind turbine on a car. The size and design of the car can affect the efficiency of the turbine, and it may not be suitable for all types of vehicles. Additionally, the added weight and drag of the turbine may slightly decrease the car's overall performance.</p><h2>5. Is it possible to install a wind turbine on an existing car?</h2><p>Yes, it is possible to install a wind turbine on an existing car, but it may require some modifications and professional installation. It is important to consult with a mechanic or engineer to ensure the turbine is installed properly and does not cause any damage to the car.</p>

1. Can a wind turbine really improve the efficiency of a moving car?

Yes, a wind turbine can improve the efficiency of a moving car by generating electricity that can be used to power the car's electrical systems, reducing the load on the engine and improving fuel efficiency.

2. How does a wind turbine on a car work?

A wind turbine on a car works by harnessing the kinetic energy of the moving air and converting it into electricity. The turbine is usually mounted on the roof or hood of the car and is connected to a generator that produces electricity.

3. What are the potential benefits of using a wind turbine on a car?

The potential benefits of using a wind turbine on a car include improved fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, and cost savings on fuel. It can also provide a backup power source in case of a battery failure or emergency.

4. Are there any limitations to using a wind turbine on a car?

Yes, there are some limitations to using a wind turbine on a car. The size and design of the car can affect the efficiency of the turbine, and it may not be suitable for all types of vehicles. Additionally, the added weight and drag of the turbine may slightly decrease the car's overall performance.

5. Is it possible to install a wind turbine on an existing car?

Yes, it is possible to install a wind turbine on an existing car, but it may require some modifications and professional installation. It is important to consult with a mechanic or engineer to ensure the turbine is installed properly and does not cause any damage to the car.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
961
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top