- #1
Milky
- 43
- 0
What does it mean to prove a complex function is well defined?
Not always. For example, consider these attempts to define a function of rational numbers:quasar987 said:No, this is a triviality.
Milky said:2. Let the two paths form a closed contour C, in which [tex]C=C_2-C_1[/tex]
3. Since the integral of a closed contour is zero, then [tex]C_1=C_2[/tex]
Since they are equal, they are independent of the path. So, it is well defined.
where have I gone wrong.
Proving that a complex function is well-defined means showing that the function is unambiguous and has a unique output for every input. This ensures that the function produces consistent and valid results.
Proving that a complex function is well-defined is important because it ensures that the function is valid and reliable. Without this proof, the function may produce incorrect or inconsistent results, making it unreliable for use in mathematical calculations or scientific experiments.
The process for proving that a complex function is well-defined involves showing that the function's output is independent of the representation of the input. This can be done by considering different representations of the input and showing that the output remains the same.
Yes, providing examples can be a helpful way to illustrate and support the proof that a complex function is well-defined. By showing that the function produces consistent results for different inputs, examples can help strengthen the overall proof.
Yes, some common mistakes to avoid when proving a complex function is well-defined include assuming that the function is well-defined without actually proving it, using circular reasoning, and not considering all possible representations of the input. It's important to carefully and thoroughly consider all aspects of the function in order to create a strong and valid proof.