Charge raising weak current

In summary, the given configuration represents a specific type of particle interaction where the incoming and outgoing lepton pairs have different handedness. This example was likely used in the exercise to illustrate the concept of particle interactions and the importance of considering particle handedness in such interactions.
  • #1
indigojoker
246
0
I am baffled by what exactly it means to have the following (ingoing, outgoing) lepton pair configuration: [tex](0,\nu_L e_R^+)[/tex] and [tex](e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0)[/tex]

This specific question was asked in Halzen and Martin exercise 12.3.

How is it possible to have 0 in going particles and a neutrino and electron going out? I know that an ingoing right-handed antineutrino is the same as a out going lefthanded neutrino, etc, but just trying to grasp what exactly this [tex](0,\nu_L e_R^+)[/tex] and [tex](e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0)[/tex] configuration means physically is confusing.

Did Halzen and Martin specifically give this example just to show one can switching ingoing and outgoing particles without looking at its physical consequences?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In this particular case, the (0,\nu_L e_R^+) and (e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0) configuration is referring to a process in which an incoming electron and antineutrino interact to produce an outgoing neutrino and positron. It is important to remember that the particle types are labelled according to their handedness, with the subscripts L and R denoting left-handed and right-handed particles, respectively. This means that the incoming lepton pair consists of a left-handed electron (e_L^-) and a right-handed antineutrino (\bar{\nu}_R), while the outgoing lepton pair consists of a left-handed neutrino (\nu_L) and a right-handed positron (e_R^+). Therefore, the (0,\nu_L e_R^+) and (e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0) configuration simply describes the process of an incoming electron and antineutrino decaying into an outgoing neutrino and positron.
 
  • #3
The (0,\nu_L e_R^+) and (e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0) configuration refers to a weak interaction process where a charged current is involved. In a weak interaction, there are two types of currents - the charged current and the neutral current. The charged current involves the exchange of a W boson, while the neutral current involves the exchange of a Z boson.

In this specific configuration, the first pair (0,\nu_L e_R^+) refers to an incoming neutrino and an outgoing electron, while the second pair (e_L^- \bar{\nu}_R,0) refers to an incoming electron and an outgoing antineutrino. This configuration is possible in a charged current weak interaction, where the incoming particles are a lepton and an antineutrino, while the outgoing particles are a lepton and a neutrino. This process can also be depicted as (l_i,\bar{\nu_i}) \rightarrow (l_f,\nu_f), where l_i and l_f represent the initial and final leptons respectively.

The reason for this specific configuration is that in a charged current weak interaction, the W boson can change the flavor of the incoming lepton and produce an outgoing lepton with a different flavor. This is known as lepton flavor violation. In this case, the incoming electron is converted into a neutrino, while the outgoing electron is produced from the decay of the W boson.

Halzen and Martin may have given this example to show the concept of lepton flavor violation and how it can be represented in terms of incoming and outgoing particles. It is important to understand the physical consequences of this configuration, as it plays a crucial role in understanding various weak interaction processes.
 

1. What is charge raising weak current?

Charge raising weak current, also known as weak charge raising, is a phenomenon in particle physics where the weak nuclear force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature, is used to transfer electric charge between particles. This process involves the exchange of weak gauge bosons, such as W and Z bosons, to change the electric charge of a particle.

2. How does charge raising weak current differ from strong and electromagnetic forces?

The strong force, also known as the strong nuclear force, is responsible for holding the nucleus of an atom together. It is much stronger than the weak force and only acts on particles with color charge, such as quarks. On the other hand, the electromagnetic force is responsible for interactions between charged particles and is much stronger than the weak force. Charge raising weak current is the weakest of the four fundamental forces and only affects particles with weak isospin.

3. What are the applications of charge raising weak current?

Charge raising weak current is essential in understanding the behavior of subatomic particles and their interactions. It also plays a crucial role in nuclear reactions and particle decays. In addition, the weak force is responsible for the process of beta decay, which is used in medical imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET).

4. Can charge raising weak current be observed in everyday life?

No, charge raising weak current is not observable in everyday life because it only affects particles at the subatomic level. The weak force is extremely weak, and its effects are only noticeable in high-energy particle collisions or in certain nuclear reactions.

5. How is charge raising weak current studied in laboratories?

In laboratories, charge raising weak current is studied through high-energy particle accelerators and detectors. These accelerators use strong magnetic fields to accelerate particles to high speeds and then collide them to study the resulting interactions. Scientists also use theoretical models and computer simulations to understand and predict the behavior of weak interactions.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top