Metropolis-Monte Carlo Algorithm

  • Thread starter ALYAZAN
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Algorithm
In summary, the conversation discusses the need for a forum dedicated to computational physics and the suggestion to modify the existing "Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics" forum to include a separate section for computational physics. The topic of the Metropolis-Monte Carlo Algorithm and the use of RNG in Monte Carlo Methods is also mentioned. There is also a mention of moving the conversation to the existing "Comp. Physics" forum.
  • #1
ALYAZAN
12
0
peace upon you every body
i spent few minutes searching where to post my topic .. because it's talking about something in computational physics and i found no forum for computational physics or things like that.

so if you don't mind opening new forum for computational physics and i can offer help for you and try to post good materials in it if you wish

my topic is about the famous Metropolis-Monte Carlo Algorithm ..
in fact Monte Carlo Methods in general are all sharing the same property which is the depending on RNG : Random Number Generating to solve problems in different ways and methods .. but they all share the same fundamental notion of depending on generating and treating random numbers or states, degrees, lengths .. etc.

the question is : what if we wanted to write a simple formula or structure for Monte Carlo Methods so any algorithm which satisfies this structure or formula would be counted as a Monte Carlo Method

and what to modify in the "supposed" structure in order to say that this would be a Metropolis-Monte Carlo Method ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
One of our forums is titled " Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics". I give you one guess what "Comp. Physics" means. This is where this thread will be moved to.

Zz.
 
  • #3
ZapperZ said:
One of our forums is titled " Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics". I give you one guess what "Comp. Physics" means. This is where this thread will be moved to.

Zz.

oh ... i didn't see that, maybe the next time i must spend more time on seeking ..
anyway ,, thank you for your help

bu the way .. maybe it's better to separate the "comp." physics in a special forum .. i think it's very wide ranged branch of physics nowadays
 

1. What is the Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm?

The Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm is a computational method used to simulate the behavior of complex systems in statistical physics. It is based on the principles of Monte Carlo simulations and was developed by scientists Nicholas Metropolis, Arianna Rosenbluth, Marshall Rosenbluth, Augusta Teller, and Edward Teller in the late 1940s.

2. How does the Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm work?

The algorithm works by randomly sampling a system's configuration space and calculating the energy at each point. It then uses a set of rules to determine whether to accept or reject the new configuration based on the difference in energy between the current and proposed states. This process is repeated many times until the system reaches equilibrium and the desired statistical properties are obtained.

3. What are the applications of the Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm?

The algorithm has a wide range of applications in physics, chemistry, and materials science. It is commonly used to simulate the behavior of gases, liquids, solids, and other complex systems. It has also been applied to problems in biology, economics, and computer science.

4. What are the advantages of using the Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm?

One of the main advantages of the algorithm is its ability to simulate systems with a large number of particles and complex interactions. It also allows for the calculation of thermodynamic properties and phase transitions, which are difficult to obtain through analytical methods. Additionally, it can be easily parallelized and is well suited for high-performance computing.

5. Are there any limitations to the Metropolis-Monte Carlo algorithm?

While the algorithm is a powerful tool for simulating many physical systems, it does have some limitations. It can be computationally expensive and is not suitable for systems that exhibit strong correlations or long-range interactions. It also requires careful tuning of the simulation parameters to ensure accurate results.

Similar threads

Puzzled about the non-teaching of Monte Carlo method(s) for error analysis
    • STEM Educators and Teaching
2
Replies
67
Views
5K
I Monte Carlo for uncertainty estimation
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
A Monte Carlo Wang-Landau_antiferromagnetic perovskite
    • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
843
I Polymer Physics - Radius of Gyration
    • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
3K
MHB Approximating the Double Integral using Monte Carlo Method
    • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
735
QFT on the lattice and Green's functions
    • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Monte Carlo Simulation: Exploring Error, Accuracy and Variance
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Monte Carlo Integration
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
890
Adsorption Isotherms via Monte-Carlo-Simulations
    • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
3K
Ressources for becoming familiar with Monte Carlo methods in stat mech
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top