Solving a Physics Dilemma: Hot Coffee and Cream Debate | Noob Physics Question

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem where a student and his physics professor are trying to determine who has a hotter cup of coffee after adding room temperature cream to their cups. The student believes his cup is hotter due to the professor's cup wasting more heat for 20 minutes before they both added the same amount of cream. However, a mathematician points out that according to Newton's law of cooling, the student's cup would always be hotter in this scenario. Another member joins the discussion and argues that the temperatures of the two coffees would be equal assuming the cream mixes instantaneously, but in reality, the temperatures would be equal due to the time it takes for the cream to mix. Ultimately, it is concluded that the temperatures of
  • #1
cubejunkies
34
0
I received this problem recently from a friend, and I think I have the right answer but I'm not sure. I also might not have enough evidence to support my case very well. Here's the problem:

A student and his physics professor are discussing his grades at the campus coffee shop. They both order coffee, which the waitress pours and delivers, piping hot, to the table. The student immediately picks up the small pitcher of room temperature cream that is on the table and puts a fair amount into his coffee, just enough to bring it to the rim of the cup. The two continue their talk, neither touching their cups for 20 minutes.

Their conversation wraps up and the professor puts the same amount of cream into his coffee as the student. They both take a sip from their cups at the same time. Which person's coffee is hotter or are they the same temperature?

You can assume that the amount of coffee and cream in each cup is identical and that both cups were served at the same temperature.

My guess is that because the professor's cup was hotter for 20 minutes, it wasted more heat, and thus I believe that the student's cup is hotter.

This is a ridiculous question, I'm almost sure of it, but please, I really need to know if I'm right.

Thanks
Anthony

ps I bet this thread is in the wrong section too, but I'm still very new to this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Assuming everything else being equal, you're absolutely right. I suppose there might be practical issues having to do with convection, the behavior of the fat in the cream, etc. But I doubt they make much difference in this case.
 
  • #3
Alright, thank you.

But the question still remains, is there any way to prove this standpoint even more?
 
  • #4
Initially I am inclined to agree with you. Let's take a look at the math behind this though...

From Newton's law of cooling we have:
[tex]T(t)=T_{env}+\left(T(0)-T_{env}\right)e^{-rt}[/tex]
Where r is some rate constant.
For simplicity's sake, let's say that when the creamer is added, we take the average of the two temperatures and they mix perfectly and instantaneously.

Case I: Creamer added initially.
[tex]T(t)=T_{env}+\left(\frac{T(0)+T_c}{2}-T_{env}\right)e^{-rt}[/tex]
Case II: Creamer added at time t
[tex]T(t)=\frac{T_{env}+\left(T(0)-T_{env}\right)e^{-rt}+T_c}{2}[/tex]

If we subtract case I from case II, we get:
[tex]\frac{T_{env}}{2}+\frac{T_c}{2}\left(e^{-rt}-\frac{1}{2}\right)[/tex]
But since in the stated problem [tex]T_c=T_{env}[/tex],
[tex]\frac{T_{env}}{2}\left(e^{-rt}+\frac{1}{2}\right)[/tex]

Since this value is always positive, it corresponds to case I always being hotter than case II. In doing the calculation, I'm starting to question my assumption about the averaging of the temperatures not effecting the answer. I might get back to you on this one, but that's it for now.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I think that the temperatures of the two coffee's will be equal.

There are two ways to look a this. The first way is to assume the coffee and cream mix instantaneously and uniformly at the moment the cream is poured in. The other way is to assume it takes time for the cream to mix.

In the first case where the cream mixes instantaneously, the student will have a hotter cup of coffee. In the second case where the cream takes time to mix then the two coffees will be at equal temperatures when the student and professor pick up their cups after a length of time to drink.

My reasoning is as follows:
Assuming the coffee and cream mix instantaneously and uniformly, the temperature of the coffee with cream will be less than the temperature of coffee without cream. This is intuitive and a statement of the second law of thermodynamics.

The rate at which energy is transferred between a body and it's environment is proportional to the differences between the temperatures of the two bodies. The rate at which energy is radiated from the body (to a black body) is proportional to the fourth power of the temperature of the body. All this means is that when you increase the temperature of the body, like a cup of coffee, the rate at which the thermal energy depletes (is transferred) from the cup of coffee becomes greater as you increase the temperature of the coffee.

It's just like a bucket half full of water with a hole near the bottom. The water will pour out much faster if the bucket is full of water, analogous to energy transferring much faster if the temperature is hotter.

So if the cream mixes instantaneously then when the student pours the cream into the coffee, the students coffee will instantaneously become colder then the professors coffee. But that is actually irrelevant initially and only matters at the end when both decide to sip their coffee after of a length of time. It is initially irrelevant because the professor's coffee will come to the same temperature as the student's coffee after a certain amount of time *(assuming this amount of time is less than the length of time they wait to sip), at which time both will loose thermal energy at the same rate. This is analogous to the bucket example where the rate at which the water pours out of the bucket decreases as the bucket becomes less full. So at the end of a length of time, the two coffees are at the same temperature. When the professor pours in their cream, that coffee will become instantaneously colder than the student's coffee. So you are correct in this case but your reasoning is off a little. It is not that the professor's coffee wasted more energy but is because of the assumption that the cream mixes instantaneously.

But in reality the cream does not mix instantaneously. It takes time for energy in the coffee to transfer into the cream and lower the average temperature of the coffee. So in reality the temperatures of the coffee's would be equal because it takes time for the cream in the professors coffee to mix. Assuming this time is longer than the time it takes the professor to pour the cream in and take a sip, then I think both are at equal temperatures.

If you disallow the assumption that I stated above next to the "*", where the time it takes the professor's coffee to come to the same temperature as the student's is less than the time they wait to sip, then at the end of the scenario, when the professor pours in the cream, their coffee will be hotter than the students coffee. This is because the professor's coffee never came to the same temperature as the student's and therefore was always hotter.

I have to examine in all of these assumptions because we're talking about a generic perfect situation. You have to choose your scenario carefully in order to answer this question.
 
  • #6
Nirgal said:
It is initially irrelevant because the professor's coffee will come to the same temperature as the student's coffee after a certain amount of time
Well, that's actually not true according to Newton's law of cooling. The temperatures of the two coffees get closer and closer but they never quite reach the same value. (Of course eventually the difference will become too small to measure)

P.S. If the mixing time is longer than the time it takes for the professor to take a sip, after he pours the cream in, then you can't really talk about the temperatures of the coffees... since until the coffee and creamer mix uniformly, the mixture has no well-defined temperature.
 

1. What is a "noob physics problem"?

A "noob physics problem" is a term used to describe a basic or introductory physics problem that is often given to beginners in order to introduce them to key concepts and principles in physics.

2. How do I solve a "noob physics problem"?

The best way to solve a "noob physics problem" is to break it down into smaller parts and identify the relevant equations and principles that apply. Then, plug in the given values and solve for the unknown. It's important to also pay attention to units and use the correct equations for the given problem.

3. What are some common types of "noob physics problems"?

Some common types of "noob physics problems" include projectile motion, Newton's laws of motion, and basic kinematics problems. These types of problems often involve solving for velocity, acceleration, time, and displacement.

4. How do "noob physics problems" relate to real-life situations?

"Noob physics problems" are often based on real-life situations and can help us understand and analyze the world around us. For example, projectile motion problems can be applied to understand the trajectory of a basketball being shot or a car accelerating on a highway.

5. What are some tips for solving "noob physics problems" more efficiently?

One useful tip for solving "noob physics problems" is to draw diagrams or make visual representations of the problem. This can help with understanding the problem and identifying the relevant equations. It's also important to practice and review fundamental principles and equations regularly to become more efficient at solving these types of problems.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top