Prove the following (using some basic axioms)

  • Thread starter KingCalc
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Axioms
In summary: Therefore, by contradiction, we can conclude that \frac{a+b}{2} < \sqrt{ab} cannot be true. And since we are given that a < b, we can conclude that a < \sqrt{ab} < \frac{a+b}{2} < bIn summary, using the ordered field axioms and properties, we can prove that if 0 < a < b, then a < \sqrt{ab} < \frac{a+b}{2} < b.
  • #1
KingCalc
5
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if 0 < a < b, then

[tex]a < \sqrt{ab} < \frac{a+b}{2} < b[/tex]


Homework Equations


Axioms (Properties), courtesy of Wikipedia:

Addition:
P1: For all a, b, and c in F, a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
P2: There exists an element of F, called the additive identity element and denoted by 0, such that for all a in F, a + 0 = a
P3: For every a in F, there exists an element −a in F, such that a + (−a) = 0
P4: For all a and b in F, a + b = b + a

Multiplication:
P5: For all a, b, and c in F, a · (b · c) = (a · b) · c
P6: There exists an element of F, called the multiplicative identity element and denoted by 1, such that for all a in F, a · 1 = a
P7: For any a in F other than 0, there exists an element a^(−1) in F, such that a · a^(−1) = 1
P8: For all a and b in F, a · b = b · a
P9: For all a, b and c in F, the following equality holds: a · (b + c) = (a · b) + (a · c)

The Attempt at a Solution




I really just don't know what to do. A small push in the right direction could make all the difference. Thanks to anyone that replies and helps.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Go through each inequality one at a time. The ordered field axioms (and consequences) are important here. The idea is to take one inequality, say (a+b)/2 < b, and perform algebra until you can see why the statement has to be true (first multiply both sides by 2, etc.). Although this may seem like taking the conclusion to be true, if you can reverse your steps so that you start with the true statement and end with the inequality you want to prove (you can usually do this if it's basic algebra and there's no loss of information between steps), then you have a rigorous proof.
 
  • #3
snipez90 said:
Go through each inequality one at a time. The ordered field axioms (and consequences) are important here. The idea is to take one inequality, say (a+b)/2 < b, and perform algebra until you can see why the statement has to be true (first multiply both sides by 2, etc.). Although this may seem like taking the conclusion to be true, if you can reverse your steps so that you start with a true statement and end with the inequality you want to prove (you can usually do this if it's basic algebra and there's no loss of information between steps), then you have a rigorous proof.

I was in the midst of doing that, but wasn't sure if I was allowed to say

"since [tex]a < b, a^{2} < a \cdot b[/tex]

similarly, [tex]\sqrt{a^{2}} < \sqrt{a \cdot b}[/tex] "On top of that, I get stuck when trying to prove the "middle" part: [tex]\sqrt{ab} < \frac{a+b}{2}[/tex]
 
  • #4
Sure you can, provided that you have proved that x^2 < y^2 implies x < y if x and y are both positive. If you're using the textbook I think you're using, you should have proved this fact already, even though technically you probably haven't shown that square roots actually exist (which is fine at this point).

For the middle part, see if you can multiply by 2, square, bring everything to one side, and factor, and make you all your steps are reversible.
 
  • #5
Suppose

[tex] \frac{a+b}{2} < \sqrt{ab} [/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow (a+b)^2 < 4ab [/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow (a+b)^2-4ab < 0 [/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow a^2 -2ab +b^2 < 0 [/tex]

[tex] \Rightarrow (a-b)^2<0 [/tex]

Which is not possible for real a and b.
 

1. What are axioms and why are they important in proving statements?

Axioms are fundamental statements or assumptions that are accepted as true without proof. They serve as the starting point for logical deductions and are essential in proving statements because they provide a solid foundation for reasoning and building more complex theorems.

2. How do you prove a statement using basic axioms?

To prove a statement using basic axioms, you must use logical reasoning and deductive methods. This involves breaking down the statement into smaller, more manageable parts and using established axioms to show how these parts are connected and ultimately lead to the truth of the statement.

3. Can axioms be proven or are they simply accepted as true?

Axioms cannot be proven, as they are the starting points for logical deductions and are accepted as true without proof. However, they can be tested and refined over time as new evidence and reasoning emerge.

4. Are there different types of axioms?

Yes, there are different types of axioms depending on the field of study. In mathematics, for example, there are axioms for different branches such as geometry, algebra, and logic. In science, there are also axioms that serve as the fundamental principles for understanding the natural world.

5. What is the purpose of proving statements using basic axioms?

The purpose of proving statements using basic axioms is to provide a logical and systematic way to establish the truth of a statement. This allows for a deeper understanding of concepts and helps to build a foundation for further exploration and discovery in a particular field.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
863
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
495
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
589
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
507
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
450
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
541
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
858
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
502
Back
Top