Affirmative action for clueless

  • News
  • Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the practice of giving inexperienced and unpopular congresspeople important committee positions and other benefits in order to boost their re-election chances. This strategy, called the "incumbent retention program," is being implemented by the Democrats in preparation for the 2008 elections. However, there are concerns about the motives behind this practice, as it may only serve to increase corruption and the influence of campaign contributions in politics. Some argue that it is better to support reformers in Congress instead.
  • #1
Rach3
What to do you with an inexperienced, unpopular congressperson, who just barely got elected, and will be spending much of his free time working on another close campaign in two years? Yes, put them in an important committee position, to boost their re-election image!

It is the “incumbent retention program,” a detailed plan worked out after Democrats gained control of Congress to fortify the most politically shaky with plum committee assignments, prized bill sponsorship and an early start on fund-raising — all in preparation for their 2008 re-election campaigns.

...The 110th Congress has not even been sworn into office. But in a measure of the determination not to surrender the majority in two years, Representative Nancy Pelosi, the presumptive speaker, has instructed aides to begin acting immediately to help Democrats who won by small margins in districts where President Bush did well in 2004 or who coasted in because their opponents were mired by controversy. Those new members are methodically being given coveted spots on high-profile committees, in particular the Financial Services Committee, a magnet for campaign contributions, and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, a platform from which to send money for projects back home.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/u...&en=5c167c76ea14a864&ei=5094&partner=homepage

I'm lucky to be cynical. I never expected the Democrats to put experienced and capable leadership over crass political gain. Oh well. :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Dems aren't doing anything that the Tom Delays and Carl Roves didn't do. Which is worse: incompetant legislators, or arogant, corrupt and incompetant legislators. I personally thing we could put chimpanzees in Washington, and based on sheer odds, they couldn't do any worse. And chimpanzees are more trustworthy!
 
  • #3
They're all power grabbers.
 
  • #4
Those new members are methodically being given coveted spots on high-profile committees, in particular the Financial Services Committee, a magnet for campaign contributions, and the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, a platform from which to send money for projects back home.
This is very troublesome. The only motivation for campaign contributions is to 'buy influence'.

The Dems aren't doing anything that the Tom Delays and Carl Roves didn't do.
While probably true, it is wrong.

We need to support the 'reformers' in Congress, e.g. Jeff Flake (Republican) of Arizona.
 

What is affirmative action for clueless?

Affirmative action for clueless is a policy or practice that aims to provide equal opportunities for individuals who may lack knowledge or understanding in a particular area.

Why is affirmative action for clueless important?

Affirmative action for clueless helps to level the playing field and promote diversity and inclusion in various fields, such as education and employment.

How does affirmative action for clueless work?

Affirmative action for clueless can take different forms, such as providing training or mentorship programs, setting aside spots for individuals in educational or employment settings, or implementing policies to accommodate those who may need extra support.

What are the potential benefits of affirmative action for clueless?

The potential benefits of affirmative action for clueless include increased diversity and representation, improved access to opportunities for marginalized groups, and the potential for individuals to gain knowledge and skills they may not have otherwise.

What are the criticisms of affirmative action for clueless?

Criticisms of affirmative action for clueless include concerns about reverse discrimination, the potential for individuals to be placed in positions they are not qualified for, and the perpetuation of stereotypes about certain groups.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top