Gasoline Engine Turbocharger Concept.

In summary: I have not had any problems with either. They both have the turbo on a side mount. I would not do anything different.In summary, the company's rear-mounted turbo system is efficient and should make more power than a traditional or rear-mounted turbo.
  • #1
Chevalade
2
0
Conventional turbocharging is done from the manifolds. Or as close to as possible.

In the last few years, a company (STSturbo) came out that designed a system for rear mounted turbos, that seems to work well.

What I am ultimately trying to figure out is the most efficient way of turbocharging a gasoline engine.

I came up with this idea.

Normal pulse matched headers, going into a y exhaust setup (say 3 1/2") running to the back of the car, mking a u turn, then up to the front, where the turbo is mounted sideways (So the compressor inlet faces grille)

Now plumb compressor straight into intercooler.

Dump turbine exhaust behind front tire.

Compressor inlet has filter on it poking into grille.

REASONING.

1. Exhaust temps to turbo would be at atmospheric temp or close to. (Denser, pulse matched and you would not lose velocity, you would gain because of size of piping used?)

2. Turbo would run 2x as cool as a conventional or rear mount.

3. Oiling is easier to plumb.

4. Turbine exhaust has little to no backpressure.

This setup should make more power than either setup. (Traditional or rear mount)

Questions I have are...

1. Must the turbo have the heat element in it to function optimally?

2. Would you need to have a smaller turbine housing with cool air pushing the turbine? or would a larger turbine housing work the same?

3. Out of the 3 setups mentioned which would produce the greater amount of compressed air (boost)

This is more for a personal project than anything. So any insight would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Anyone?
 
  • #3
Any chance of some sketches? I'm finding it hard to picture your proposal.
 
  • #4
The problem with this, and with the STS kits, - and their general reasoning at least in their sales pitch- is that YES, the gas because denser... This does not mean it has more energy or capability to drive a turbine.

I don't want to go too crazy, but both pressure and temperature contribute to the energy content of a gas. The point of a turbine, is to pull that energy out of a gas and turn it into usable mechanical work, in this case to turn a compressor. Their logic is fundamentally flawed in that cooling the gasses does NOT drive the compressor better, in fact you are LOOSING energy which can be harnessed to do work, in the form of lost thermal energy. This is accompanied by a drop in pressure. Overall, this drop in energy hurts the maximum amount of energy available for the turbocharger. Now, here is where they get away with it: Turbocharger systems operate with a wastegate, which routes exhaust gasses around the turbine, because they are sized such that the available energy is more then what is required by the compressor to achieve a requested boost level. So, all that *really* gets hurt is the spool up time / lag, and they combat this by using smaller, more restrictive housings, which hurts overall system flow and thus power.

It works ok, for a budget system. Their marketing is very decieving and well, pretty much incorrect, but a lot of people believe it anyways. I would definantly NOT take this system to the extreme by doubleing the distance to the turbocharger, in fact if one wanted to improve uppon the STS systems the first place I would start is with major insulation of the exhaust system on the way to the turbocharger in order to keep this energy in the system.

FYI, on higher horsepower setups (I build turbo honda's and vw's in my spare time) we often see 30-50psi gauge pressure in the exhaust manifold before the turbocharger, at tempuratures up to 1700 degrees F... Drop that temperature down to near ambient, and the pressure decrease this will come with, your going to have one VERY poor running turbocharger.
 
  • #5
YOU WANT A VERY SHORT PIPE TO THE TURBO AS BIG AS POSSABLE
study race car turbos they do it that way BECAUSE IT WORKS
yes turbo's get HOT , cold gas has little energy = low power

remember the big trade off in turbo's is drivability
too slow a responce [called spool] makes a poor driving car

I own and drive two turbo cars a gas volvo and a diesel M-B
 

1. What is a gasoline engine turbocharger?

A gasoline engine turbocharger is a device that increases the power and efficiency of a gasoline engine by forcing more air into the combustion chamber. It uses the engine's exhaust gases to spin a turbine, which then compresses the incoming air and delivers it to the engine at a higher pressure. This allows the engine to burn more fuel and produce more power.

2. How does a gasoline engine turbocharger work?

A gasoline engine turbocharger works by utilizing the energy from the engine's exhaust gases to spin a turbine, which is connected to a compressor. The compressor then forces more air into the engine's cylinders, allowing it to burn more fuel and produce more power. This process is known as forced induction.

3. What are the benefits of using a gasoline engine turbocharger?

The main benefits of using a gasoline engine turbocharger include increased power and torque, improved fuel efficiency, and reduced emissions. By forcing more air into the engine, a turbocharger allows the engine to burn more fuel, resulting in more power. This also helps the engine to operate more efficiently, reducing fuel consumption. Additionally, a turbocharger can help reduce emissions by allowing the engine to burn fuel more completely.

4. What are the potential drawbacks of using a gasoline engine turbocharger?

One potential drawback of using a gasoline engine turbocharger is increased complexity and cost. Installing a turbocharger requires additional components and modifications to the engine, which can be expensive. Additionally, a turbocharged engine may require more frequent maintenance and may not last as long as a naturally aspirated engine.

5. Are there any alternative technologies to a gasoline engine turbocharger?

Yes, there are alternative technologies to a gasoline engine turbocharger, such as superchargers and hybrid powertrains. Superchargers are similar to turbochargers in that they force more air into the engine, but they are driven directly by the engine instead of the exhaust gases. Hybrid powertrains combine a gasoline engine with an electric motor to improve power and efficiency. However, each of these alternative technologies has its own advantages and limitations, and the best option will depend on the specific needs and goals of the vehicle.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
816
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top