Could Molybdenite Replace Silicon?

  • Thread starter sanman
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Silicon
In summary, there is an ongoing search for a replacement for silicon as a semiconductor material due to scaling issues. One promising candidate is molybdenite, which has been found to have superior properties compared to silicon. However, there are still challenges in terms of deposition technology and it remains to be seen if it will be a viable successor. Despite the search for a replacement, silicon is still the dominant material in modern informatics technologies due to its abundance and unique properties.
  • #1
sanman
745
24
Here's an interesting article about molybdenite having superior semiconductor properties in comparison to silicon:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-01/epfd-nta012811.php

What's the verdict? Is this stuff the better material? Could be it a viable successor for future applications?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know anything about MoS2, but having superior properties compared to Si is nothing to write home about. Si is a very poor semiconductor.
 
  • #3
And yet our modern informatics technologies are overwhelmingly based on it. Perhaps because of its abundance?

Molybdenite is supposed to be fairly abundant too, although probably not as much as silicon. I can't wait to see someone come out with the first molybdenite chip. I wonder where we'd be today if this material had been selected over silicon from the very beginning?
 
  • #4
sanman said:
I wonder where we'd be today if this material had been selected over silicon from the very beginning?
The major advantage of Si is really the Si/SiO2 interface, and the real question is where would we be without it. I wonder if we may have called it quits on the MOSFET if it had been as hard as with other semiconductors like III-Vs (there is still no equivalent MIS type device in III-Vs, but we don't really need it). Without MOSFETs, you would not have VLSI. And ironically, the low electron mobility in Si is what makes CMOS possible. The success of Si was a driving force for III-Vs since we knew that the concept worked. But Si is still a poor semiconductor. There are plenty of others in use right now for applications that cannot be accomplished with Si. Your cell phone is full of III-V devices.

Don't hold your breath on MoS2 devices. Just because the place that made them says it will revolutionize the world doesn't mean it's true. They just want funding. I've heard it all before. But it doesn't necessarily mean they won't work either. Just take it with a grain of salt.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Well, what would be the counterpart to the Si/SiO2 interface? Couldn't MoS2 be similarly modified through dopants as well? I think the next step is for someone to create some practical working devices from MoS2, and show their performance advantages.

Currently there are mixed lattice substrates which mate one silicon to other materials. Maybe this could be done with MoS2 as well.
 
  • #6
sanman said:
And yet our modern informatics technologies are overwhelmingly based on it. Perhaps because of its abundance?

Molybdenite is supposed to be fairly abundant too, although probably not as much as silicon. I can't wait to see someone come out with the first molybdenite chip. I wonder where we'd be today if this material had been selected over silicon from the very beginning?

As a former mineral collector, just want to pass the two comments:

1) Silicon is the most common solid element in the Earth's crust by far. However, extracting elemental silicon is extremely energy intensive, and it never occurs in elemental form in nature.

2) Molybdenite is a reasonably common mineral and occurs as is. Only purification needed to use it as a semiconductor.
 
  • #7
The beauty of Si as a semiconductor was that you could oxidise the surface then deposit an electrode on top of it to form a MOSFET. Now, with deposited dilectrics like HfO2, that advantage is unimportant and the opportunity exists for new substrates. MoS2 looks interesting but a viable deposition technology shall be required. That probably requires volatile reactive precursors for MOCVD or ALD. There's a lot more to it than only purification to use it as a semiconductor!
 
  • #8
Due to scaling issues with Si, the ongoing search for replacements is extremely widespread. One need only check out the "Beyond CMOS" session at one of the anuual conferences of the Materials Research Society. From CNT based FET's to complex oxide based Mott Transistors to (now) Molybdenite, there have been thousands of materials that have been studied for potential to replace Silicon, and many dozens have graced the pages of Science, Nature and Nanoletters, as suitable candidates. Yet, here we are, still with Si-based technology.

I'm not saying that Silicon won't be replaced - I believe that to some extent it almost definitely has to be, if we hope to keep scaling channel sizes downward ... but in the mean time, one has to not be tempted to think that the next material that is expected to potentially replace Silicon (especially in the Press), will likely do so. There's many a slip between the lab and the lip of the science reporter.
 

1. What is Molybdenite and how is it different from Silicon?

Molybdenite is a mineral that contains the element molybdenum. It has a similar chemical composition to Silicon, but its atomic structure is different, making it a more efficient conductor of electricity.

2. What are the potential benefits of using Molybdenite instead of Silicon?

Molybdenite has several potential benefits over Silicon, including higher conductivity, lower power consumption, and the ability to operate at higher temperatures. This could lead to faster and more energy-efficient electronic devices.

3. How feasible is it to replace Silicon with Molybdenite in current technology?

Currently, Molybdenite is not widely used in electronic devices, and there are still many challenges to overcome before it can replace Silicon. Some of these challenges include finding a way to mass-produce Molybdenite-based components and integrating them with existing technology.

4. Are there any potential drawbacks to using Molybdenite instead of Silicon?

One potential drawback of using Molybdenite is its stability. It can oxidize when exposed to air, which could affect its performance and longevity. Additionally, since it is a relatively new material, there is still much research needed to fully understand its properties and potential limitations.

5. Is there ongoing research and development in using Molybdenite as a replacement for Silicon?

Yes, there is ongoing research and development in this area. Scientists and engineers are continuously exploring ways to improve the production, performance, and integration of Molybdenite in electronic devices. However, it may still be several years before we see widespread use of Molybdenite in commercial technology.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
3
Replies
99
Views
32K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top