|Register to reply||
Rules of Parity and Charge Conjugation Parity
|Share this thread:|
Apr5-14, 05:27 AM
I have two related questions to ask relating to statements found in introductory particle physics textbooks.
The first is that the "Dirac equation predicts fermions/anti-fermions have opposite intrinsic parity".
I have attempted to verify this by applying the parity transformation to free particle Dirac spinors using an explicit choice of representation. I find that it is true provided the particles are at rest but otherwise, they are not in a state of definite parity. This doesn't seem consistent with the quotation.
The second statement is that "fermion-antifermion pairs with total orbital angular momentum number L and total spin S, have a parity factor (-1)^(L+S) when interchanged". There is some reference to a minus sign appearing upon the interchange of antifermion with fermion which I have not been able to justify. Could anyone show me a detailed explanation of this factor please?
|Register to reply|
|List of Charge Conjugation and Parity numbers||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||3|
|The Parity Operator: Find the average value of the parity.||Advanced Physics Homework||2|
|Parity switching wave functions for a parity invariant hamiltonian?||Quantum Physics||2|
|Understanding parity and parity conservation||High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics||0|
|Undergrad nuclear physics; spin parity rules||Introductory Physics Homework||1|