The interaction between two electriferous particles

In summary, the discussion revolves around the concept of 4-forces and their transformation in different Lorentz systems. These 4-forces, also known as Minkowski forces, are represented by a 4-vector and are responsible for the electromagnetic effects between charged particles. In different frames of reference, the 4-forces may appear differently, showing the close relationship between electric and magnetic fields. This concept is similar to the unified entity of space-time, where space and time are not independent but deeply connected.
  • #1
dreamsfly
27
0
There are two electriferous paticles,moving in the same v&direction,then in our opinion,there will be an magnetic effect,but in particles' opinion,there will not be,how to explain it in relativity?:confused:

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What does "electriferous" mean? It's not familiar, nor in the dictionary.

If we imagine two charged particles, stationary with each other, they repel each other with a certain force F in their rest frame. The force represents a rate of change of momentum with time, ie F = dp/dt

If we use "proper time" instead of coordinate time, the force becomes a 4-force, which is the same for all obsesrvers. I.e the 4-force = dp/dtau. "proper" time is just time as measured by a clock on the particle itself.

When we observe two charged particles from a moving frame, the 4-force between them stays constant. When we break this force down into components, though, we find that this constant 4-force is described differently by the two observers. One observer attributed the 4-force entirely to electric fields, the other observer sees both electric and magnetic fields. Both observers agree on the value of the 4-force, though.
 
  • #3
I think I can understand this for EM forces.
However, how about forces due to gravity?
In the proper frame of reference, both particles' masses are equal to their rest masses;
in the lab frame of reference, their masses are greater than their rest masses.
Therefore, according to Newton's law of gravitation F=GMm/r^2,
accelerations due to gravity appears to be different in the two inertial frames of reference.

I am not sure whether this problem arised from these two reasons below:
1. The local frame of each particle is not an inertial frame due to the presence of the gravitational force between them;
2. Newton's law of gravity does not apply here.

So, is one of them right or there are other reasons to explain it?
Thanks!
 
  • #4
It´s similar. Look up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitomagnetism" [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
pervect said:
Both observers agree on the value of the 4-force, though.
No. the Minkowski force (4-force) is a 4-vector, so its components are different in different Lorentz systems.
 
  • #6
dreamsfly said:
There are two electriferous paticles,moving in the same v&direction,then in our opinion,there will be an magnetic effect,but in particles' opinion,there will not be,how to explain it in relativity?:confused:

Thanks!
There is a magnetic effect in one Lorentz system that is not present in another. In general, the "Lorentz force" q(E+ vXB) will be different in the two systems.
However, F=ma doesn't hold in special relativity.
If the acceleration is related properly to q(E+vXB), the acceleration
is always directly from one particle to the other in any system.
This is treated in Sec. 15.3.2 of "Classical Electromagnetism" by Franklin.
I have not seen it discussed in other texts.
 
  • #7
Meir Achuz said:
No. the Minkowski force (4-force) is a 4-vector, so its components are different in different Lorentz systems.

4-vetors are generally regarded as being frame-independent objects, though their components can (and indeed must) vary with different coordinate systems.

For the purposes of this thread, what is important is that we know that 4-vectors representing dynamical quantites such as forces must transform in an identical manner that 4-vectors representing kinematical quantities such as distance. All 4-vectors transform in exactly the same way, regardless of their origin as dynamical or kinematical quantities.

Thus if we know the 4-force on an object in one coordinate system at a specific point in space-time, we know what the 4-force is on that object in any coordinate system at that same point, via the Lorentz transforms.

An analogy might help:

If we have two particles at rest relative to each other at some specific coordinates, they have a geometric relationship.

When we view the same two particles from different frames of reference, the space and time coordinates get "mixed together" by the Lorentz transform. Two particles that are separated only by space in one coordinate system are separated by both space and time in another, moving coordinate system. Space and time are not independent, but part of a unified entity known as space-time.

In a similar manner, E and B fields between the particles, like the coordinates of the particles, "mix together" in different frames of reference. Moving E fields create B fields, and moving B fields create E fields. E and B fields are thus not independent, but part of a larger unified entity - which has a name, the Faraday tensor.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Then it's true that it will be different in different frame?That is to say ,in some frame,there may be Lorentz force,in some other there may not?
 
  • #9
dreamsfly said:
Then it's true that it will be different in different frame?That is to say ,in some frame,there may be Lorentz force,in some other there may not?

It's a fact that in some frame there will be a Lorentz force, and in another frame there will not be.

Another standard example is a charge moving in a magnetic field. If you transform to the frame of the charge, the charge appears to be stationary. There is still, however, a force on the charge - but this force is due to the electric field.

As I mentioned previously, this is why we talk about the "electromagnetic" field as a unified entity. They really are not separate, they are deeply connected, in much the same way that space and time are connected.

This is analogous to the way we talk about "space-time" as a unified entity.
 
  • #10
Thank you very much for your answer!
 
  • #11
pervect said:
It's a fact that in some frame there will be a Lorentz force, and in another frame there will not be.
The Lorentz force F is related to the relativistic 4-vector (sometimes called the "Minkowski Force") (\gamma v.F;\gamma F).
If a 4-vector=0 in one Lorentz frame, it must be zero in all Lorentz frames.
 

1. What is the definition of an electriferous particle?

An electriferous particle is a particle that carries an electric charge, either positive or negative.

2. How do two electriferous particles interact with each other?

Two electriferous particles interact with each other through the electromagnetic force. This force can either attract or repel the particles based on their charges.

3. What factors determine the strength of the interaction between two electriferous particles?

The strength of the interaction between two electriferous particles depends on the magnitude of their charges and the distance between them. The closer the particles are to each other, the stronger the interaction will be.

4. Can two particles with the same charge interact with each other?

Yes, two particles with the same charge can interact with each other. They will repel each other due to the like charges.

5. How does the interaction between two electriferous particles affect their motion?

The interaction between two electriferous particles can cause a change in their motion. If they are attracted to each other, they may move towards each other. If they are repelled, they may move away from each other. The strength of the interaction will also determine the speed and direction of their motion.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
524
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
723
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
745
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
805
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top