Forces that depend only on distance

  • Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Forces
In summary, classical mechanics follows the principle of relativity where motion equations are invariant to changes in inertial reference frames. This means that in different frames, the equations of motion look the same and forces are also the same. However, in relativistic descriptions, equations are covariant with respect to Lorentz transformations of coordinates, meaning that there is no need for time-independent forces. This is because the equations are invariant to spacetime coordinate transformations in general.
  • #1
fisico30
374
0
It is said that if a force depends only on distance (And not on time), the equations that involve those forces are invariant to a change of the frame of reference...is this true?

Coulomb's force law is only dependent on distance. At a certain space location the force has a value that does not change with time. But after the object is subjected to that force, it moves to a new spatial position and the force on it changes. So there is a change with time...

A time changing source generates a time changing field and therefore a time changing force on an object... what is special about these type of forces? Why don't they fit in the frame of reference transformations? after all, in classical mechanics time is absolute and distance differences are invariant...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,
in classical mechanics, motion equations are invariant to changes of inertial reference frame.
Imagine the force acting on a particle given as a function of coordinates and time. Consider two mutually moving frames, with nocoinciding origins O, O'. The coordinates in these frames are related by Galilei transformation, which in the simplest case of two equally oriented coordinated systems and motion od S' along x with velocity v is

[tex]
x' = x - vt,
y' = y,
z' = z,
t' = t.
[/tex]

(In general, x,y,z would enter in some linear combinatinons, but t' would be always t). Then in S and S' frames the equations of motion are

[tex]
\mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = m\mathbf a(t)~~,~~\mathbf F'(x',y',z', t) = m\mathbf a'(t).
[/tex]

The equations looks the same - every frame use its coordinates to describe the particle, but the form of law is the same. We say that Newton's law of motion is covariant with respect to Galilean transformations coordinates. Furthermore, because frames are inertial, forces are the same

[tex]
\mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = \mathbf F' (x',y',z', t).
[/tex]

There is no need to have the time independent force; equations are covariant in general.

In relativistic description (which is closer to reality), the equations are again covariant in respect to, but Lorentz transformation of coordinates, which in our special case is

[tex]
x' = \gamma(x - vt),
y' = y,
z' = z,
t' = \gamma(t-vx/c^2).
[/tex]

For example, the law of motion of a particle in EM field is in S

[tex]
qF^\mu_{~\nu}(x,y,z,t) u^\nu(t) = m\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t)
[/tex]

and in S'

[tex]
qF'^\mu_{~\nu}(x',y',z',t') u^\nu(t') = m\frac{d^2 x'^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t').
[/tex]

So there is no need to have the time independent force - formulae are invariant with respect to spacetime coordinate transformations in general.

Jano
 
  • #3


I can confirm that it is true that forces that only depend on distance are invariant to a change of the frame of reference. This means that the equations describing these forces will remain the same, regardless of the observer's perspective or reference point. This is known as Galilean invariance, and it is a fundamental principle in classical mechanics.

The reason why these forces do not fit into frame of reference transformations is because they are not affected by changes in time. In classical mechanics, time is considered to be absolute, meaning it is the same for all observers regardless of their frame of reference. However, in the case of forces that only depend on distance, the time component is not relevant, as the force remains constant at a given distance. This is why these forces are not affected by changes in the frame of reference.

In contrast, forces that depend on time, such as a time-varying source generating a time-varying field, will not be invariant to changes in the frame of reference. This is because the time component is a crucial factor in these types of forces, and changing the frame of reference will also change the perception of time.

Overall, forces that only depend on distance have a special property of being invariant to changes in the frame of reference, which is a fundamental principle in classical mechanics. Understanding and applying this principle is essential for accurately describing and predicting the behavior of physical systems.
 

1. What are some examples of forces that depend only on distance?

Some examples of forces that depend only on distance include gravitational forces, electric forces, and magnetic forces.

2. How do these forces vary with distance?

These forces vary with distance according to an inverse-square law, meaning that as distance increases, the force decreases by the square of the distance.

3. What is the mathematical equation for these types of forces?

The mathematical equation for forces that depend only on distance is F = Gm1m2/d^2, where F is the force, G is the universal gravitational constant, m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and d is the distance between them.

4. How do these forces affect the motion of objects?

These forces can cause objects to accelerate or decelerate depending on the direction and magnitude of the force. They can also cause objects to orbit around each other.

5. Can these forces act at a distance?

Yes, these forces act at a distance without the need for physical contact between the objects. This is known as action at a distance and is a fundamental concept in physics.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
4
Replies
131
Views
4K
Replies
86
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
955
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
356
  • Classical Physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
500
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top