Bush throws votes for Kerry

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the dangers of having a person who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts as Commander and Chief, specifically in regards to the Iraq War. The Bush administration claimed that Iraq had reconstituted nuclear weapons and was attempting to acquire uranium, aluminum tubes, and magnets for a uranium-enrichment program. They also claimed that Iraq had met with nuclear weapons experts and had the know-how to produce nuclear weapons. However, the UN weapons inspectors found nothing and Bush dismissed their findings, stating that it was up to Iraq to show and destroy their weapons. He also made claims of Iraq having mobile germ-warfare laboratories, possession of chemical and biological toxins, and a stockpile of weapons capable of killing millions of people. However
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,756
A person who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not the kind of person that you want as Commander and Chief
-- George W. Bush; 10/27/04

Vice President Dick Cheney stated three days before U.S.-led coalition forces invaded Iraq this past March that Iraq “has reconstituted nuclear weapons.

The Bush administration claimed that Iraq was attempting to acquire uranium from Niger.

The October NIE claimed that Iraq was attempting to obtain aluminum tubes and magnets for use in a gas centrifuge-based uranium-enrichment program.

The administration claimed that Hussein was meeting with top nuclear weapons experts and that Iraq maintained the scientific know-how to produce nuclear weapons.

Bush said October 7 that Iraq was reconstructing buildings at sites where its nuclear weapons facilities had previously been located.
http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2003_09/Nuclearclaims.asp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bush began by dismissing the fact that UN weapons inspectors have found nothing since their return to Iraq, claiming that it was not their job to “conduct a scavenger hunt.” Rather, he said, “It is up to Iraq to show exactly where it is hiding its banned weapons, lay those weapons out for the world to see and destroy them as directed. Nothing like this has happened.”
...assertion that Iraq has built mobile germ-warfare laboratories,
...Bush went on to charge Iraq with possession of chemical and biological toxins
...Bush spoke of a stockpile of weapons sufficient “to subject millions of people to death by respiratory failure
...As for the quantities cited by Bush—25,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum, 500 tons of nerve agents
...Even more grotesque is Bush’s arithmetic on shells capable of carrying chemical agents. He cited CIA claims that Iraq had once had 30,000 such munitions
...Bush declared, “The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb.” [continued]
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/feb2003/iraq-f01.shtml
 
  • #3


It is important to carefully consider the evidence and facts before making any conclusions. While it is understandable to have concerns about a leader who may jump to conclusions, it is also important to gather all the information and fully understand the situation before making a judgment. In this case, there were multiple claims made by the Bush administration about Iraq's nuclear capabilities, but many of these claims were later found to be false or exaggerated. Therefore, it is important to question the reliability and accuracy of these claims and to not jump to conclusions without fully understanding the facts. As a leader, it is crucial to make decisions based on solid evidence and not on assumptions or incomplete information.
 

What evidence is there to support the claim that Bush threw votes for Kerry?

There is no credible evidence to support this claim. All election results are closely monitored and verified by multiple sources to ensure accuracy and prevent tampering. Any allegations of widespread voter fraud have been thoroughly investigated and proven false.

Why would Bush throw votes for Kerry?

There is no logical reason for President Bush to throw votes for his opponent. The purpose of an election is for voters to choose their preferred candidate, and it would go against the principles of democracy for the current president to manipulate the outcome in favor of the opposing candidate.

What is the motivation behind this conspiracy theory?

The motivation for this conspiracy theory may stem from political bias and a desire to discredit the legitimacy of the election results. It may also be fueled by misinformation and false narratives spread by certain individuals or groups.

How do election officials prevent voter fraud and ensure fair elections?

Election officials use various methods to prevent and detect voter fraud, such as requiring identification, cross-checking voter registration lists, and monitoring voting machines for any irregularities. Additionally, election laws and procedures are constantly reviewed and updated to ensure fairness and accuracy in the voting process.

What should I do if I suspect voter fraud or manipulation in an election?

If you suspect any type of voter fraud or manipulation in an election, you should report it to the appropriate authorities immediately. This could include contacting your local election officials, state election board, or the Federal Election Commission. It is important to provide any evidence or information you have to support your claim.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
88
Views
13K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top