The Mystery of Capital: Exploring Its Genesis & Critical Flaw

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mystery
In summary, the conversation discusses the mystery surrounding the genesis of capital and the lack of explanation from rich nations to other nations about the importance of a formal property system in capital formation. The conversation also touches on the flawed assumption that successful capitalism requires oppressing others and the corruption and ineffectiveness of organizations like the IMF and World Bank in promoting market economics in developing countries.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,755
Why has the genesis of capital become such a mystery? And why have the rich nations of the world not explained to other nations how indispensable a formal property system is to capital formation?

...The bell jar makes capitalism a private club, open only to a privileged few, and enrages the billions standing outside looking in. This capitalist apartheid will inevitably continue until we all come to terms with the critical flaw in many countries' legal and political systems that prevents the majority from entering the formal property system.[continued]
http://www.tessproject.com/products/seminars&training/seminar%20series/Assets_Materials/The_Mystery_of_Capital.pdf [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is nonsense. Complete and utter nonsense.
 
  • #3
Okay. Why?
 
  • #4
Ivan Seeking said:
Okay. Why?
Its so bad, its difficult to know where to start. The subtext is the first hint: saying this needs to be explained to 3rd world countries implies there is some secret to it.

Second, what it describes just plain isn't how economics works. The condo I live in (owned by my best friend) is worth a specific amount of money for a specific reason: people are willing to pay that amount to buy it. It doesn't get any simpler than that.

Basically, it starts with the assumption that to become a successful capitalist country you have to oppress others and tries to fit the data to the conclusion. Its not even wrong.
 
  • #5
Hey look, me and Russ agree. What a great way to bring in the new year, Peace on Earth may have hope after all.
 
  • #6
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
russ_watters said:
(snip)Basically, it starts with the assumption that to become a successful capitalist country you have to oppress others and tries to fit the data to the conclusion. Its not even wrong.

Huh? http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/03/desoto.htm ? Can't say I see such an assumption --- can't say the IMF 1/4ly is the original source.

de Soto's got a different slant on what I call "cultural inertia," but, beyond that the guy's pretty well nailed things --- his 200 year development period is more in the neighborhood of one-two ka if you happen to buy historical and archeological perspectives.

What were the circumstances/conditions in Europe and western hemisphere that favored development of capitalism? Nobody knows. The West went the property system direction, and the East got locked up in monarchial tax farming systems. Hong Kong thrived for all China to see for damned near two centuries before China chartered a bank and joined the mainstream global economy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
I admit I havn't read the whole article but the first part really does seem full of assumptions that I don't agree with.
 
  • #9
You really need to read the whole article in the IMF quarterly. The quotes Ivan pulled out really misrepresents the intent of the article IMO, but would you expect anything less considering the source ? Har har, good one Ivan.
 
  • #10
Bystander said:
Hong Kong thrived for all China to see for damned near two centuries before China chartered a bank and joined the mainstream global economy.

China has joined your mainstream global economy under the barrel of a gun, and on the dead bodies of countless Chinese, same for Japan and other Asian nations(actually all).
 
  • #11
Smurf said:
Hey look, me and Russ agree. What a great way to bring in the new year, Peace on Earth may have hope after all.
Bizarre

Happy new year to you too.
Ivan Seeking said:
Of course the source is the quarterly magazine of the International Monetary Fund.
I guess I'm expected to be a fan of the IMF...?
 
  • #12
I'm much more partial to the IGMTSF
 
  • #13
From what I have read cursorily, the article makes a lot of sense. If there is not a comprehensive legal system to recognise and delineate any property right I have in my mud hut, how am I ever going to realize its financial potential by securing my financial arrangement with it and to engage in other economic activity as soon and as frequently as I want to? The English legal system transplanted to Hong Kong has always been touted as the best legacy a colonial government can be bestowed and I think for good reasons.
 
  • #14
russ_watters said:
I guess I'm expected to be a fan of the IMF...?

:biggrin: No, I was assuming just the opposite.
 
  • #15
Ivan Seeking said:
:biggrin: No, I was assuming just the opposite.

? Opponents of the IMF tend to be partisans of the third world, hence leftist if intellectual, green if street demonstrators. Do you think russ belongs in either category?
 
  • #16
The IMF and the World Bank are corrupt, financed by governments, controlled by goverments and use government (=taxpayers) money in order to do large scale interventions in third world countries. Usually resulting in catastrophic investments, corruption of the third world government and gigantic debts to be payed by the common people. This is socialism on a high level.

Why should any proponent of capitalism support them?

Yesterday I debated the World Bank at a conference in the Swedish parliament. My point was this: Statistics clearly show that free markets are successful where they are practised, but the WB, despite its advocacy of market economics, can show very few successful economies among those they have advised and sent money. Why? Simply because it’s almost impossible to push averse governments into reform with aid promises. They will take the money and do minimal reforms. Kenya’s dictator Daniel Arap Moi got 19 structural adjustment loans but never reformed, Pakistan got 20 loans, all with the condition that it reduced the budget deficit, but never did, and Zaire’s dictator Mobutu got 9 loans, and the only privatisation he ever practised was when he stole all the government funds himself.

Some WB-countries really reformed and made progress, such as Uganda and Mauritius, but most corrupt regimes never consented to the “Washington Consensus”. So why did they get funds again and again? The problem is that the World Bank is a political, tax-funded institution with its own interests. The country department’s budgets, staff and career opportunities depend on how much money they can give away. Noone ever wants to close their department just because the country they advise never reforms. The only graph that makes steady progress is the one on the World Bank’s staff – from 657 people in the 1960s to more than 10 000 today. Former World Bank economist William Easterly has written a great book on this problem, The Elusive Quest for Growth, which I highly recommend.
http://www.johannorberg.net/?month=01&year=2004&page=displayblog [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
No, however, since I strongly support the IMF [or at least I did] I assumed that Russ doesn't. It was a guess based on experience. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #18
selfAdjoint said:
? Opponents of the IMF tend to be partisans of the third world, hence leftist if intellectual, green if street demonstrators. Do you think russ belongs in either category?
Those are the most vocal, but there is another catgory, illustrated by Aquamarine, and I fall into that category.
 

1. What is the main thesis of "The Mystery of Capital"?

The main thesis of "The Mystery of Capital" is that the lack of a formalized system for property rights is the critical flaw hindering economic development in many developing countries. The author argues that in order for capitalism to be successful, there must be a system in place that allows individuals to have secure ownership over their assets and the ability to use those assets to generate wealth.

2. How does the author support their argument in "The Mystery of Capital"?

The author uses extensive research and case studies from various countries to support their argument. They also draw upon historical examples, such as the success of property rights in Western societies, to demonstrate the importance of formalized property rights in economic development.

3. What are some potential counterarguments to the main thesis of "The Mystery of Capital"?

Some potential counterarguments may include the idea that a lack of property rights is not the only factor hindering economic development in developing countries. Other factors such as political instability, corruption, and inadequate infrastructure may also play a role. Additionally, some may argue that implementing a formalized system of property rights may not address underlying issues of poverty and inequality.

4. How does "The Mystery of Capital" propose to address the critical flaw of property rights in developing countries?

The author proposes a three-part solution to address the critical flaw of property rights in developing countries. This includes formalizing property rights through legal reforms, creating a system for registering property, and implementing a system for converting informal property into formal property. The author also suggests the involvement of international organizations and foreign investment to support these efforts.

5. What are some potential implications of the ideas presented in "The Mystery of Capital"?

The ideas presented in "The Mystery of Capital" have potential implications for economic development and poverty reduction in developing countries. By formalizing property rights, individuals and communities may have greater access to credit and investment opportunities, which can lead to increased economic growth and prosperity. However, there may also be challenges in implementing these ideas, such as resistance from traditional landowners and the need for significant institutional and legal reforms.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
4
Replies
117
Views
13K
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
2
Views
494K
Back
Top