Old questions: Should you answer them? How old is too old?

  • Thread starter pa5tabear
  • Start date
In summary: Or, you can just sit tight, and wait, because inevitably, the same question will pop up again soon enough!
  • #1
pa5tabear
175
0
I just realized I answered a question which was asked two days ago. If it were me, I would have definitely found the answer within that timespan, and the asker may have too. In this case, the answer will probably not benefit the OP, but perhaps it will help if future people have that question.

How do you decide if a question is too old to be worth responding to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You ought to check "latest activity" of the OP.
If you find some week-old question from OP, but he's still around today, it moght be worthwhile in answering the question.
 
  • #3
Some people also setup notifications for their threads and if they do get a response, they will find out, so unless the thread is like 4 months old, I would still reply :)
 
  • #4
pa5tabear said:
I just realized I answered a question which was asked two days ago. If it were me, I would have definitely found the answer within that timespan, and the asker may have too. In this case, the answer will probably not benefit the OP, but perhaps it will help if future people have that question.

How do you decide if a question is too old to be worth responding to?

Please remember that if the question looks to be for schoolwork, we do not directly answer the questions. We can provide tutorial help, but we do not provide solutions.

If it's obviously not a schoolwork question, and is in the general technical forums, it's usually okay to answer away... :smile:
 
  • #5
berkeman said:
Please remember that if the question looks to be for schoolwork, we do not directly answer the questions. We can provide tutorial help, but we do not provide solutions.

If it's obviously not a schoolwork question, and is in the general technical forums, it's usually okay to answer away... :smile:

The question in mind was clearly a schoolwork question, which is why I was questioning the worth of answering a few days later.

My answer just gave an overall solution pathway with no details.
 
  • #6
when i started out here some years ago, i was so hyped, i wanted to answer every question i knew an answer to, and searched back years. I quickly became known as a dumpster diver. On another site i frequent there are actually badges for creative dumpster diving, or "necromancing" as they term it (which i think means raising the dead). You get points if you resurrect a question more than 60 days old and still get 5 positive votes for your answer. (I have 19 necromancer badges.) It was fun for a while, but now that I am up to speed, I don't need to research old questions, as I have already seen most of them. But unless there is a premium on space i see no harm in it. Knowledge is useful forever.
 
  • #7
pa5tabear said:
How do you decide if a question is too old to be worth responding to?
Remember, that you are not just answering the OP. You are helping everyone else who comes along too. PF gets a LOT of Google hits.

Two days is definitely within the zone. Two years, not so much.
 
  • #8
One consideration that members should take into account is that the rules for the site have developed over time. If you're thinking about posting in an old thread have a quick run through to check if the thread would be within the rules if posted now. If not, best to leave it.
 
  • #9
DaveC426913 said:
Remember, that you are not just answering the OP. You are helping everyone else who comes along too. PF gets a LOT of Google hits.

I second that! I shall try to answer the questions for which I feel that I have a good answer, regardless of posting time. Provided they are generally useful (meaning that someone could have a similar problem in future)
 
  • #10
Yuu Suzumi said:
I second that! I shall try to answer the questions for which I feel that I have a good answer, regardless of posting time. Provided they are generally useful (meaning that someone could have a similar problem in future)

Or, you can just sit tight, and wait, because inevitably, the same question will pop up again soon enough!

Zz.
 
  • #11
mathwonk said:
when i started out here some years ago, i was so hyped, i wanted to answer every question i knew an answer to, and searched back years. I quickly became known as a dumpster diver. On another site i frequent there are actually badges for creative dumpster diving, or "necromancing" as they term it (which i think means raising the dead). You get points if you resurrect a question more than 60 days old and still get 5 positive votes for your answer. (I have 19 necromancer badges.) It was fun for a while, but now that I am up to speed, I don't need to research old questions, as I have already seen most of them. But unless there is a premium on space i see no harm in it. Knowledge is useful forever.

How long do you have to wait to answer before you can get necromancer points?

(Just curious, for no particular reason, but is three months long enough?)
 
  • #12
You could send a private message to the OP to see if the OP is still waiting for an answer.
 
  • #13
Yuu Suzumi said:
I second that! I shall try to answer the questions for which I feel that I have a good answer, regardless of posting time. Provided they are generally useful (meaning that someone could have a similar problem in future)
Just be sure that you do not give answers to homework! no matter how old the thread is, answers are not allowed, as the same problems could come up. The the answers should help guide a member, not spoon feed them.
 

1. What is considered an "old" question?

An "old" question refers to a question that has been asked and answered before, typically in the context of a specific field or area of study. The definition of "old" may vary depending on the subject matter and the pace of advancements in that field.

2. Is it important to answer old questions?

Yes, it is important to answer old questions because they can provide valuable insights and information that may still be relevant and useful. Additionally, by answering old questions, we can build upon previous knowledge and potentially make new discoveries.

3. How do you determine if a question is too old to answer?

There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on the specific question and the current state of the field. Some questions may become irrelevant over time due to advancements or changes in the field, while others may still hold value. It is important to consider the context and relevance of the question before determining if it is too old to answer.

4. What are the benefits of answering old questions?

Answering old questions can lead to a deeper understanding of a subject, help to fill in gaps in existing knowledge, and potentially lead to new discoveries. It can also provide a foundation for future research and advancements in the field.

5. Are there any downsides to answering old questions?

One potential downside to answering old questions is that the information may already be widely known and may not contribute much to the current state of the field. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the research and findings are still relevant and accurate, as new information and advancements may have emerged since the question was originally asked.

Similar threads

  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
918
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
31
Replies
1
Views
35
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top