Why 10-adics are not a field?

  • Thread starter aalireza
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Field
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of fields and how to determine if a set is a field. It is mentioned that a field is a special type of ring, and that a field has no zero divisors. The conversation then shifts to the topic of 10-adics and whether they have zero divisors, with a link provided for further information.
  • #1
aalireza
5
0
I've got a question and I really need the answer! Why 10-adics are not a field? And generally, How can you be sure that a given set is a field or not? For example rational numbers are a field, but what about the others and how can you be sure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You cannot decide whether a given set is a field. You can decide whether a given ring is a field. After all, a field is by definition a special kind of ring, namely a commutative ring in which every nonzero element is invertible. In particular, a field has no zero divisors (i.e. a field is a domain). If you can show that a certain ring has zero divisors, then it is not a field.
 
  • #3
@Landau:
My bad, you're right. But what is the zero divisors for 10-adics? Is there any example?
 
  • #5


I would like to clarify that the concept of 10-adics is a mathematical concept and not a scientific one. However, I can still provide an explanation as to why 10-adics are not a field.

Firstly, let's define what a field is. A field is a set of numbers where the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are defined and follow certain rules. In a field, every non-zero number has a multiplicative inverse, meaning that it can be multiplied by another number to give a result of 1. Additionally, the operations of addition and multiplication are commutative and associative, and the distributive property also holds.

Now, 10-adics are a type of number system called the p-adic numbers, where p represents a prime number. In the case of 10-adics, the base number is 10. The 10-adic numbers are constructed by taking infinite sequences of digits and grouping them into numbers, similar to how we construct decimal numbers. However, unlike decimal numbers where the digits are multiplied by powers of 10, in 10-adics, the digits are multiplied by powers of 10 in the opposite direction (i.e. from right to left).

The main reason why 10-adics are not a field is that they do not follow the rule of multiplicative inverses. In other words, not every non-zero 10-adic number has a multiplicative inverse. For example, the number 2 in 10-adics does not have a multiplicative inverse since there is no 10-adic number that can be multiplied by 2 to give a result of 1. This violates one of the fundamental properties of a field.

To determine whether a given set is a field or not, one needs to check if it follows all the rules and properties of a field. For example, the set of rational numbers is a field because it follows all the rules of a field, including the existence of multiplicative inverses for every non-zero number. Other examples of fields include the set of real numbers, complex numbers, and finite fields.

In conclusion, 10-adics are not a field because they do not follow the fundamental properties of a field, specifically the existence of multiplicative inverses. To determine if a given set is a field, one needs to check if it follows all the rules and properties of a field.
 

1. Why can't 10-adics be a field?

10-adics, also known as p-adic numbers, cannot be a field because they do not satisfy the field axioms. In particular, they do not have a multiplicative inverse for every non-zero element. This means that not every element can be divided by another element, which is a requirement for a field.

2. What are the consequences of 10-adics not being a field?

Since 10-adics do not form a field, they do not have all the properties and operations that a field has. This means that some common algebraic manipulations and calculations may not be applicable to 10-adics. In addition, theorems and concepts from abstract algebra that rely on the field axioms may not hold in the context of 10-adics.

3. Are there any advantages to 10-adics not being a field?

While it may seem like a disadvantage for 10-adics to not be a field, it actually allows for a different kind of mathematical structure and analysis. 10-adics have their own unique properties and applications, particularly in number theory and algebraic geometry.

4. Can 10-adics be extended to form a field?

It is possible to extend 10-adics to form a larger mathematical structure that does satisfy the field axioms. One example is the field of fractions of 10-adics, which includes additional elements to make it a field. However, this extended field does not have all the same properties and applications as 10-adics.

5. How do 10-adics compare to other non-field mathematical structures?

10-adics are just one example of a non-field mathematical structure. Other examples include integers, which do not have multiplicative inverses, and matrices, which do not have commutativity. Each of these structures has its own unique properties and uses in mathematics, and it is important to understand the differences between them.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
763
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
858
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
936
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
789
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top