Register to reply

Fourier series: complex vs ordinary method

by Nikitin
Tags: complex, fourier, method, ordinary, series
Share this thread:
Nikitin
#1
Dec2-13, 07:24 AM
P: 627
Hi! Which is the better method for finding fourier expansions of a function? The ordinary one (find a_0, b_n and a_n with separate integrals), or the one which uses complex numbers (just find c_n)?
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Heat distributions help researchers to understand curved space
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
jbunniii
#2
Dec2-13, 03:10 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
jbunniii's Avatar
P: 3,288
I generally prefer the method using complex numbers (##c_n##), because the formula is easier to remember. But neither is "better" than the other. Use whichever is easier to evaluate for the specific problem you're working on. For an even or odd function, the real formula may be easier because either the ##a_n##'s or the ##b_n##'s will all be zero.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Complex fourier series Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Complex Fourier Series Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Complex Fourier Series & Full Fourier Series Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Complex power series to calculate Fourier series Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Complex fourier series Calculus & Beyond Homework 4