Register to reply

Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help

Share this thread:
one_raven
#1
Apr16-14, 08:51 AM
P: 239
I'm hoping for some help in understanding how the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment in 1925 is held as a refutation of the Stokes-Planck theory of gravitational aether drag.

If I understand the Stokes-Planck theory correctly, complete dragging of the aether near a sufficiently massive body (diminishing at distance, in accordance to the inverse square law as it applies to gravitational force) would be essentially indistinguishable from a complete dragging model. Wouldn't it also be indistinguishable from a non-aetheric model?
Didn't Michelson-Gale-Pearson support that?

What am I missing?

Thanks.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Engineers develop new sensor to detect tiny individual nanoparticles
Tiny particles have big potential in debate over nuclear proliferation
Ray tracing and beyond
UltrafastPED
#2
Apr16-14, 11:58 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
UltrafastPED's Avatar
P: 1,908
This should be posted in the Special & General Relativity forum.
one_raven
#3
Apr16-14, 12:19 PM
P: 239
I wasn't sure, because the Stokes-Planck theory was a classical interpretation that pre-dated Relativity - and, if it were accepted, would have stood in opposition to Relativity.

Can I move it, or does a moderator have to?

one_raven
#4
Apr18-14, 12:02 PM
P: 239
Michelson-Gale-Pearson Refutation of Stokes-Planck - Help

Can a moderator move this to the Relativity sub-forum, please?
Maybe it will get a response there.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
The Refutation of Bohmian Mechanics Quantum Physics 235
Resolution refutation help Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0
Gale and whozum pics General Discussion 3
What is Planck time, Planck length, Planck particle General Physics 5