Is the perception of backwards time possible in relativity during deceleration?

  • Thread starter Ookke
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary, the conversation discusses the relativity of simultaneity and its interpretation in the context of two distant space stations, A and B, and a rocket R traveling between them. The rocket's perspective of time at B appears to go backwards during deceleration, but this can be explained as a change in coordinate systems rather than an actual observation. The setting of clocks is also discussed, emphasizing that it is a convention and can be manually adjusted. The concept of non-inertial coordinates is also mentioned as a way to understand these situations.
  • #1
Ookke
172
0
Hi. A short question regarding relativity of simultaneity, its interpretation and maybe some terminology.

Suppose A and B are distant space stations, at rest with each other, clocks synchronized. A rocket R travels with high speed passing A at time t=0, heading towards B. Not going into details, from R's perspective the clock reading at B could be couple of years ahead.

If the rocket suddenly stops at A, it enters the frame of A and B, where the clocks are synchronized. After stop R will agree with A that the time at B is t=0.

Should we say that from R's perspective time went backwards at B during the deceleration? Of course R could not really watch the event because of distance and finite light speed, but nevertheless R "observed" it (in the sense commonly used in relativity, involving calculations). Or should we think this only a coordinate system change, not an observation at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ookke said:
If the rocket suddenly stops at A, it enters the frame of A and B, where the clocks are synchronized. After stop R will agree with A that the time at B is t=0.
Setting of clocks is a convention. If, when the rocket stops, it wants its clocks to match those of B, it will need to set them manually. It's like clocks changing in winter (in countries where that happens!) - you simply change your clock to match the "official" time.

The point is that the rocket does not "enter the frame of A and B". It can always be described in any frame - just like anything else. It's motion change means that its clocks now tick at the same rate as A's and B's clocks, but it doesn't mean that they must show the same time.
Ookke said:
Should we say that from R's perspective time went backwards at B during the deceleration?
No. If you want a single coherent perspective for R, it cannot be two inertial frames naively stitched together, precisely because doing that would cause some events to have two coordinates assigned to them and some none. My favourite way of constructing non-inertial coordinates is Dolby and Gull's radar time - see https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0104077.
 

1. What is "observing backwards time"?

Observing backwards time refers to the concept of witnessing events or phenomena that have already occurred in the past. It is a theoretical concept that proposes the possibility of observing events in reverse order, contrary to the flow of time as we currently understand it.

2. Is it possible to observe backwards time?

Currently, there is no scientific evidence or technology that allows us to observe backwards time. The concept remains purely theoretical and has not been proven or observed in any experiments.

3. How does the theory of relativity relate to observing backwards time?

The theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, states that time is relative and can be influenced by factors such as gravity and velocity. This theory allows for the possibility of time travel and therefore, could potentially support the idea of observing backwards time.

4. Can observing backwards time change the course of history?

As mentioned earlier, there is no scientific evidence or technology that supports the concept of observing backwards time. Therefore, it is currently impossible to determine if it could have any impact on the course of history.

5. What are the implications of observing backwards time?

If observing backwards time were to become scientifically possible, it would challenge our current understanding of time and could potentially lead to new theories and advancements in the field of physics. It could also have significant implications for concepts such as causality and free will.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
661
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
800
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
710
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
686
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top