Linear attenuation coefficient

In summary, the linear attenuation coefficient is named as such because it is linearly proportional (inversely) to the energy. When determining the coefficient from a graph, it is important to refer to reliable sources such as the NIST website or use online tools like XCOM software. The equation for determining the coefficient is A_{\rm mat}=A_0\exp\left(\frac{\mu}{\rho}t_{\rm mat}\rho\right), where A_{\rm mat} is the transmission through the material, A_0 is the initial transmission, \mu and \rho are the linear attenuation coefficient and density of the material, and t_{\rm mat} is the thickness of the material. The value
  • #1
timmo567
4
0
is the linear attenuation coefficient named like it is because it is linearly proportional (inversely) to the energy?

I have to read off the coefficient from a graph I have. I have the value for a 2MeV photon, if I want the value for a 1MeV photon is it simply twice the 2MeV value? Reading off the value for the 1MeV photon my value is close to twice the 2MeV value, so I'm wondering if it is meant to be off or is it an error? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No..you should not interpolate the graph. Linear attenuation coefficient should be determined from reliable sources..refer to NIST website.
Or you find from online using XCOM software.
[tex]
A_{\rm mat}=A_0\exp\left(\frac{\mu}{\rho}t_{\rm mat}\rho\right)
[/tex]
where [tex]\frac{A_{\rm mat}}{A_0}[/tex] is the transmission through materials 'mat'
[tex]\mu, \rho[/tex] are linear att. coefficient and density of 'mat'.
[tex]t_{\rm mar}[/tex] thickness of 'mat'.
the value [tex]\frac{\mu}{\rho}[/tex] can obtained from NIST website for 1 MeV
 

What is the definition of "Linear attenuation coefficient"?

The linear attenuation coefficient refers to the measure of how much a material reduces the intensity of a beam of radiation as it passes through it. It is a property that is dependent on the type of material and the type of radiation being used.

How is the linear attenuation coefficient calculated?

The linear attenuation coefficient is calculated by taking the natural logarithm of the initial intensity of the radiation and dividing it by the thickness of the material and the initial intensity. This value is then multiplied by -1 to account for the reduction in intensity.

What factors affect the linear attenuation coefficient?

The linear attenuation coefficient is affected by several factors, including the type of material being used, the energy of the radiation, and the thickness of the material. It can also be affected by the density, atomic number, and chemical composition of the material.

What are some common units of measurement for the linear attenuation coefficient?

The linear attenuation coefficient can be measured in several units, including centimeters^-1, meters^-1, and inverse meters (m^-1). It can also be measured in units specific to certain types of radiation, such as square centimeters per gram (cm^2/g) for X-rays and square meters per kilogram (m^2/kg) for gamma rays.

Why is the linear attenuation coefficient an important concept in radiation science?

The linear attenuation coefficient is an important concept in radiation science because it helps to determine how much radiation will be absorbed by a material, and therefore how much protection is needed when working with radioactive materials. It also plays a crucial role in medical imaging, as it can be used to calculate the amount of radiation that reaches a patient's body during a procedure.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
979
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
907
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top