Drude model electron interaction


by charbon
Tags: drude, electron, interaction, model
charbon
charbon is offline
#1
Jan6-14, 10:19 PM
P: 23
In every source I've checked so far, we make the assumption that we can neglect electron-electron interaction in this model but they always fail to give any reason to answer why this is plausible. Does anyone know how physicists convinced themselves of this at the time and even now (other than the fact that it just works of course!)?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers develop scalable methods for manufacturing metamaterials
Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy
After 13 years, progress in pitch-drop experiment (w/ video)
voko
voko is online now
#2
Jan7-14, 06:47 AM
Thanks
P: 5,506
The model that Drude originally proposed was a lot crazier than what is now usually meant by "Drude's model". In it, "electrons" were both positive and negative, plus they could carry a multiple of elementary charge e. Oh, and they did not have any mass (but they had an "apparent mass"). He then said that the question why those "electrons" don't get stuck together and form "neutral aether-points" "explains itself" once the kinetic energy of the "electrons" exceeds some certain level. The collisions between them were what determined their mean free path, on which the entire theory hinges.
DrDu
DrDu is offline
#3
Jan7-14, 07:39 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,369
Quote Quote by charbon View Post
In every source I've checked so far, we make the assumption that we can neglect electron-electron interaction in this model but they always fail to give any reason to answer why this is plausible. Does anyone know how physicists convinced themselves of this at the time and even now (other than the fact that it just works of course!)?
The answer is known under the name "Landau fermi liquid theory":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_liquid_theory

Basically, electron-electron collisions can only be neglected in a small region around the Fermi surface due. For these electrons, momentum conservation and Pauli principle prohibits scattering.
The difficult part is to show that, if electron-electron interactions are taken into account, there is still a Fermi surface.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Drude Model Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Penrose zigzag model of Higgs-electron interaction High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 8
Drude model and electron mean free path? Advanced Physics Homework 0
is Free-electron model := Drude Model (of metals) ? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2
drude model! Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 5