
#1
Jan614, 10:19 PM

P: 23

In every source I've checked so far, we make the assumption that we can neglect electronelectron interaction in this model but they always fail to give any reason to answer why this is plausible. Does anyone know how physicists convinced themselves of this at the time and even now (other than the fact that it just works of course!)?




#2
Jan714, 06:47 AM

Thanks
P: 5,535

The model that Drude originally proposed was a lot crazier than what is now usually meant by "Drude's model". In it, "electrons" were both positive and negative, plus they could carry a multiple of elementary charge e. Oh, and they did not have any mass (but they had an "apparent mass"). He then said that the question why those "electrons" don't get stuck together and form "neutral aetherpoints" "explains itself" once the kinetic energy of the "electrons" exceeds some certain level. The collisions between them were what determined their mean free path, on which the entire theory hinges.




#3
Jan714, 07:39 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,378

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_liquid_theory Basically, electronelectron collisions can only be neglected in a small region around the Fermi surface due. For these electrons, momentum conservation and Pauli principle prohibits scattering. The difficult part is to show that, if electronelectron interactions are taken into account, there is still a Fermi surface. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Drude Model  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  0  
Penrose zigzag model of Higgselectron interaction  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  8  
Drude model and electron mean free path?  Advanced Physics Homework  0  
is Freeelectron model := Drude Model (of metals) ?  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  2  
drude model!  Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics  5 