Magnet force on an object separated by small space

[mmartelli]

I'm trying to approximate forces on a system.

One of my Forces is a 6x8x1" Ceramic Grade 8 magnet on an ferromagnetic object, but they are separated by a small space (about 3/16").

I know the Pull of the magnet, but is there a way to calculate the pull of the magnet relative to the distance away it is from the object?

 

[chrisbaird]

The actual magnetic field and hence force is typically complex and depends on the magnets shapes, magnetization, orientation, and the ferromagnet's shape, permeability, history, location, and orientation. To a good approximation though, most single permanent magnets create dipole fields, and dipole fields die off as 1/r³. So if the maximum force you measure when there is no separation is F₀, then the force F as a function separation r would be F = F₀/r³ to a crude approximation.

 

[Per Oni]

Shouldn’t that be F=Fo x d^3/r^3 ? where d is the length from one pole to the middle of the magnet and r is also to be taken from the middle of the magnet. (ofcourse also to a crude approximation).

 

[chrisbaird]

Actually, it would be more like F = F₀/(r+d)³ if r is the distance from the pole's surface, and d is the distance from the pole's surface to the center of the magnet. Sorry for error

 

[chrisbaird]

If you have a little experience with programming, vectors, and numerical methods, it's actually not that hard to write a little code that solves for the three-dimensional static magnetic field due to any shaped magnet. Just solve each component of $\nabla$² A = μ₀ J_mag using the relaxation method with sources. Here J_mag is the effective magnetization current describing the magnet. Then the magnetic field is B = $\nabla\times$ A.

 

[Per Oni]

chrisbaird, the problem I’m referring to is that you stated that Fo is a force, which is fine, but then it follows that Fo/r^3 cannot possibly be a force as well. It would give a very strange answer. Therefore I suggested that F can be worked out by Fo times the ratio d^3 and r^3. This way at least the answer is in Newton and you still have an 1/r^3 dependency. This way if both distances are taken from the centre then when r=d, F=Fo, which is correct.
I haven’t tried that formula and I wish I had more time to find out. It would be nice if mmartelli could tell us.

 

[chrisbaird]

chrisbaird, the problem I’m referring to is that you stated that Fo is a force, which is fine, but then it follows that Fo/r^3 cannot possibly be a force as well. It would give a very strange answer. Therefore I suggested that F can be worked out by Fo times the ratio d^3 and r^3. This way at least the answer is in Newton and you still have an 1/r^3 dependency. This way if both distances are taken from the centre then when r=d, F=Fo, which is correct.
I haven’t tried that formula and I wish I had more time to find out. It would be nice if mmartelli could tell us.

You are right, in my effort to simplify things for the OP, I keep making the equation unphysical. I should stop digging this hole.

Here is the full form for a magnetic dipole: