Fusion Terminology: Is it Fission or Fusion?

In summary, the conversation discusses the criteria for classifying a nuclear reaction as fusion and whether or not the reaction ^{11}B + ^{1}H \rightarrow 3 \alpha can be considered fusion. The experts agree that while it may not fit the textbook definition, it can be classified as fusion based on the energy released and the technology used to extract power. They also mention other similar reactions involving hydrogen and medium-sized nuclei.
  • #1
Khashishi
Science Advisor
2,813
492
Ok, I am a fusion physicist, but I still don't know what the strict criterion is for calling a nuclear reaction a fusion reaction. Yes, it's a collision between two nuclei that results in a bigger nucleus. But, then [itex]^{11}B + ^{1}H \rightarrow 3 \alpha[/itex] is usually called a fusion reaction. Isn't it more like fission?

Is it called fusion because most of the energy released comes from the low binding energy of hydrogen-1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[itex]^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow 3\alpha[/itex] starts with two particles (on the left) and ends with one particle (on the right). Isn't that what "fusion" means?
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy said:
[itex]^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow 3\alpha[/itex] starts with two particles (on the left) and ends with one particle (on the right). Isn't that what "fusion" means?
[itex]^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow \alpha + \alpha + \alpha[/itex]

How about now?
 
  • Like
Likes Toast
  • #4
@Bandersnatch: :D

That reaction could be both, fusion and fission.
I think (something with protons)+(something with protons) -> (something) is fusion. It might be followed by a fission reaction.
 
  • #5
I agree that the p+B reaction doesn't fit into the typical cookie cutter textbook definition of "fusion." But IMO its the best label.

Its helpful to at the binding energies per amu

H-1 is 0. MeV/amu
He-4 is 7.07 MeV/amu
B-11 is 6.93 MeV/amu

Notice that B-11 and He-4 have roughly the same binding energy per amu. This means that most of the energy (7.1 out of 8.7 Mev) released is coming from the conversion of hydrogen to helium. Thus from an energetic standpoint I argue that this is a fusion reaction.

Also the technology required to extract power from this reaction is similar to other fusion reactors but very different from a typical fission reactor. Thus I also argue that from a practical standpoint it useful to categorize p+B with other fusion reactions.

Note that p+B is not unique. If you look up the CNO cycle you'll see that there are several intermediate fusion reactions that involve H reacting with an medium sized nucleus resulting in helium and a smaller product nucleus. Example (H+N-15 = He-4 + C-12).
 
  • #6
Bandersnatch said:
[itex]^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow \alpha + \alpha + \alpha[/itex]

How about now?

:rofl: good one!
 

1. What is the difference between fission and fusion?

Fission and fusion are both nuclear reactions that release energy, but they differ in how they produce this energy. Fission involves splitting an atom into two smaller atoms, while fusion involves combining two atoms into a larger one.

2. Which process is used in nuclear power plants?

Nuclear power plants use fission reactions to generate energy. They split uranium atoms, releasing heat that is used to produce steam and turn turbines, which then generate electricity.

3. How is fusion used in the Sun?

The Sun uses fusion reactions to release energy and sustain its heat and light. It combines hydrogen atoms to form helium, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process.

4. Can fusion be used as a source of energy on Earth?

Scientists are currently researching ways to harness fusion as a source of energy on Earth. While fusion has the potential to provide a virtually limitless supply of clean energy, it is still a complex and expensive process that has yet to be fully developed for practical use.

5. Is fission or fusion more dangerous?

Both fission and fusion reactions have the potential to release large amounts of energy, but fusion reactions are generally considered safer because they produce less radioactive waste and have a lower risk of catastrophic accidents. However, the technology for harnessing fusion is still in its early stages, so it is difficult to make a direct comparison between the safety of fission and fusion.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
800
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top