Radiation and Health Interest Group

In summary, there has been extensive research on the potential health risks of EMF, RF, and radiation emission from devices and man-made structures. Some researchers have found beneficial effects of certain low intensity magnetic fields, while others have discovered possible harmful effects on the immune system and melatonin levels. However, there is no clear consensus on the exact relationship between EMF exposure and health consequences, and the research is highly complex and non-linear. There is also limited research on the potential link between RF emission and cancer risk, as it is a controversial and liability-heavy topic. Some studies have found a correlation, while others have not. It is important to carefully consider and analyze all available research on this topic.
  • #1
Fallingwaffle
3
0
Dear Colleagues,

Is there anyone here who would be interest in sharing articles, data, theories, and discussions on risks of EMF, RF, radiation emission from devices and man made structures and health consequences and epidemiology. Please contact or send a follow up post here.

I am specifically interested in learning of the effect it has on cancer spread as well as math models to precisely measure or predict the amount emitted and from there have some sort of clinical/epidemiology application.

Its just one of those things that I ponder every once a year or so.

Respectfully yours
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
There has been a lot of research in this area as far back as the 1960ies. Please read the work by Robert O. Becker who started to summarize the existing research as early as 40 years ago. He and his colleague Andrew A. Marino subsequently discovered beneficial aspects of certain low intensity magnetic fields and direct electrical stimulation. All of these effects are highly non-linear and there is no direct "dose" relationship. It is a very complex subject as certain frequencies show an effect (e.g. check FDA website regarding magnetic fields effects on bacteria for purposes of developing new disinfection methods) and others do not. If one could model it that would be great but there is insufficient public information to do so.

R.O. Becker concluded that magnetic fields of certain frequency bands interfere with the human (and animal) immune system. That means for example that testing cells in a Petri dish will not predict what is going to happen to a person exposed to the same field.

More recent research shows the modulation of melatonin levels in the brain when exposed to certain ultra low frequency and low strength magnetic field levels. See Dr. Sandyk's research. Since melatonin is a cancer inhibitor this could be relevant to your research as well.

Research on how RF emission may increase the risk of cancer is very limited as there are huge liabilities associated with that. Who wants to go down the road of the tobacco companies and determine that their own product may be a health hazard? If your model would show a risk for certain frequencies or power levels it would be very easy to "discredit" you by just running a few tests under slightly different test parameters (change waveform, repetition rates, peak amplitude vs average etc) that would escape the attention of most people.
Good luck.
 
  • #3
I will be reviewing the above mentioned authors and their works. Perhaps I will be able to post some highlights from their research on PF for further analysis.

Regarding harmful effects of EMF, I heed the cautions of research into frequency/dose specific effects and how such research is easily refutable. That being said a number of article seem to pop up on Pubmed regarding this concern and associations to childhood cancers. None of these are particularly landmark to my knowledge and some are critical or provide evidence against the idea of EMF associated cancer incidence. I am providing the links or article information as food for thought:

1.
A pooled analysis of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and childhood brain tumors.
Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM, Feychting M, Johansen C, Monroe J, Murphy MF, Oksuzyan S, Preston-Martin S, Roman E, Saito T, Savitz D, Schüz J, Simpson J, Swanson J, Tynes T, Verkasalo P, Mezei G.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 1;172(7):752-61. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq181. Epub 2010 Aug 9. Review.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 20696650 PMCID: PMC2984256

2.
Exposure to electromagnetic fields (non-ionizing radiation) and its relationship with childhood leukemia: a systematic review.
Calvente I, Fernandez MF, Villalba J, Olea N, Nuñez MI.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Jul 15;408(16):3062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.039. Epub 2010 May 7. Review.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 20451240

3.
Living near overhead high voltage transmission power lines as a risk factor for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case-control study.
Sohrabi MR, Tarjoman T, Abadi A, Yavari P.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(2):423-7.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 20843128

4.
Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?
Otto M, von Mühlendahl KE.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Oct;210(5):635-44. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Review.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 17765660

5.
Childhood leukemia and EMF: review of the epidemiologic evidence.
Kheifets L, Shimkhada R.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S51-9. Review.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 16059924

6.
Risk of childhood leukemia in areas passed by high power lines.
Lin RS, Lee WC.
Rev Environ Health. 1994 Apr-Jun;10(2):97-103. Review.
PubMed [citation]PMID: 8047676

Respectfully yours
 
  • #4
First, welcome to the forum. Some friendly advice. The consensus is that there is no corelation. A thread needs to have a direction, the only mainstream discussion would be against such a relationship, as you have already pointed out.

Other analyses employing alternate cutpoints, further adjustment for confounders, exclusion of particular studies, stratification by type of measurement or type of residence, and a nonparametric estimate of the exposure-response relation did not reveal consistent evidence of increased childhood brain tumor risk associated with ELF-MF exposure. These results provide little evidence for an association between ELF-MF exposure and childhood brain tumors.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696650

And please, as you can see by other posts in this forum, out of courtesy, we ask that you give the actual link, like this one, to the first paper you listed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696650

That way people don't have to hunt for it. Also, I would only post a few significant papers, not the entire roster, quoting the conclusion of the paper, as I did above. That way people can judge whether it's worth their time reading.
 
  • #5
,

I find this topic both fascinating and important. The potential health effects of radiation, particularly from man-made devices and structures, is a complex and ever-evolving area of research. I would be interested in joining this group and contributing to discussions on this topic.

In terms of measuring and predicting radiation emissions, there are various mathematical models and tools available that can help in this process. However, it is important to note that the effects of radiation on human health are not always straightforward and can vary depending on factors such as exposure levels, duration, and individual susceptibility.

Regarding your interest in the relationship between radiation and cancer spread, there is ongoing research in this area and some studies have shown a possible link between EMF/RF radiation and certain types of cancer. However, more research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind this relationship.

I look forward to engaging in discussions and sharing knowledge with this group. Thank you for initiating this dialogue and for your dedication to exploring the risks of radiation on human health.
 

1. What is the purpose of the Radiation and Health Interest Group?

The Radiation and Health Interest Group is a community of scientists, researchers, and professionals who are interested in studying the effects of radiation on human health. The group aims to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and exchange of knowledge and ideas to advance our understanding of radiation and its impact on health.

2. How does radiation affect our health?

Radiation can have both beneficial and harmful effects on our health. Low levels of radiation exposure, such as from natural sources, can be beneficial for stimulating our immune system and promoting cell repair. However, high levels of exposure, particularly from man-made sources, can increase the risk of developing cancer and other health problems.

3. What are the different types of radiation?

There are three main types of radiation: alpha, beta, and gamma. Alpha radiation is made up of two protons and two neutrons and has a low penetrating power, meaning it can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Beta radiation is made up of high-speed electrons and has a slightly higher penetrating power, able to penetrate through skin and clothing. Gamma radiation is a type of electromagnetic radiation with the highest energy and penetrating power, able to pass through most materials.

4. How do we protect ourselves from radiation exposure?

There are several ways to protect ourselves from radiation exposure, including time, distance, and shielding. Limiting the amount of time we spend near a radiation source can reduce our exposure. Increasing the distance between ourselves and the source can also decrease exposure. Using shielding materials, such as lead or concrete, can also help to block or reduce the amount of radiation that reaches us.

5. What current research is being done on radiation and health?

There is ongoing research in various fields related to radiation and health, such as medical radiation therapy, environmental radiation exposure, and occupational radiation exposure. Some current areas of research include developing more precise techniques for measuring and monitoring radiation exposure, studying the long-term effects of radiation on human health, and exploring potential treatments for radiation-related health problems.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
729
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top