Proving the Containment Property of Polar Cones for Sets in R^n

In summary, the polar cone of the set S = {x \in ℝ^{n}: x = Ap, p \geq 0}, where A \in M_{n*m}, p \in ℝ^{m}, is defined by the set {a \in R^{n}: x^{T}a \leq 0, for all x \in S}. However, it is not possible to make a conclusion about "a" from this definition.
  • #1
avilaca
4
0
Let S1*(S2*) be the polar cone of the set S1(S2) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_cone_and_polar_cone).

How can I show that if S1 is contained in S2 then S2* is contained in S1*.

It looks obvious (especially if we think in R^2), but I do not find a way to prove it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
welcome to pf!

hi avilaca! welcome to pf! :smile:
avilaca said:
How can I show that if S1 is contained in S2 then S2* is contained in S1*.

It looks obvious (especially if we think in R^2), but I do not find a way to prove it.

isn't the proof obvious from the definition based on inner product? (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_cone_and_polar_cone) :wink:
 
  • #3
Ok, it's easy from the inner product <a,s> = ||a||.||s||cos[itex]\theta[/itex].
<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> pi/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] [itex]\theta[/itex] [itex]\leq[/itex] 3pi/2.
This means that if S1 [itex]\subset[/itex] S2, by the above result, the region where the condition {<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 , s [itex]\in[/itex] S1 or S2, a [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]} is true for S1 is the same or it's larger than the one for S2, which implies S2* [itex]\subset[/itex] S1*.
 
  • #4
Now another challenge:

Let S = {x [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x = Ap, p [itex]\geq[/itex] 0}, where A [itex]\in[/itex] M[itex]_{n*m}[/itex], p [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{m}[/itex].
What is its polar cone S*?
 
  • #5
avilaca said:
Ok, it's easy from the inner product <a,s> = ||a||.||s||cos[itex]\theta[/itex].
<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> pi/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] [itex]\theta[/itex] [itex]\leq[/itex] 3pi/2.
This means that if S1 [itex]\subset[/itex] S2, by the above result, the region where the condition {<a,s> [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 , s [itex]\in[/itex] S1 or S2, a [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]} is true for S1 is the same or it's larger than the one for S2, which implies S2* [itex]\subset[/itex] S1*.

looks good! :smile:
avilaca said:
Now another challenge:

Let S = {x [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x = Ap, p [itex]\geq[/itex] 0}, where A [itex]\in[/itex] M[itex]_{n*m}[/itex], p [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ[itex]^{m}[/itex].
What is its polar cone S*?

show us what you get :wink:
 
  • #6
I didn't achieve a great conclusion.

S* can be defined by {a [itex]\in[/itex] R[itex]^{n}[/itex]: x[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0, for all x [itex]\in[/itex] S}.

Now:
x[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> (Ap)[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0 <=> p[itex]^{T}[/itex]A[itex]^{T}[/itex]a [itex]\leq[/itex] 0.

But I can not conclude nothing about "a" from here.
 

What is a Polar Cone?

A Polar Cone is a geometric shape that is formed when you intersect a cone with a plane that is perpendicular to its axis. It resembles an inverted pyramid with a circular base and its properties are dependent on the angle of the intersecting plane.

What are the basic properties of a Polar Cone?

The basic properties of a Polar Cone include its circular base, its apex, and its axis. The base is a circle with a radius that is determined by the angle of the intersecting plane. The apex is the point at which all the lines of the cone converge, and the axis is the line that runs from the apex to the center of the base circle.

How does the angle of the intersecting plane affect the Polar Cone?

The angle of the intersecting plane determines the shape and size of the base of the Polar Cone. A smaller angle will result in a smaller base, while a larger angle will result in a larger base. Additionally, the angle also affects the height and slant of the cone, which will in turn affect the volume and surface area of the cone.

What are the practical applications of Polar Cones?

Polar Cones have various practical applications in engineering and architecture. They are commonly used in the design and construction of bridges, tunnels, and other structures that require a strong and stable base. They are also useful in creating 3-dimensional models for mathematical and scientific purposes.

Can Polar Cones be found in nature?

Yes, Polar Cones can be found in nature in various forms. Some examples include the shape of certain shells, the patterns of snowflakes, and the structure of some plants and flowers. They are also present in geological formations such as volcanoes and mountain peaks.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
941
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top