Tension force in catenary

In summary, the conversation revolves around a mathematical problem involving the equation of a catenary. The goal is to solve for the minimum tension on the cable, denoted as T in the equation, using inputs such as the sag at mid-span (y(L/2)), the distributed load (w), and the position along the cable (x). The speaker has been using excel and solver to solve the equation, but is looking for a better method. It is mentioned that the weight of the cable can be negligible compared to the load, and that the shape of the cable may be closer to a parabola than a catenary. There is also discussion about the horizontal component of tension (H) and its relationship to the cable shape and load.
  • #1
Engineering01
11
0
Hello all,

I have yet another mathematical quandary that is robbing me sleep, so I return to gather ideas.

This problem (fuelled from self-study) involves the equation of a catenary.

The profile of a catenary can be expressed as y(x) = T/w*(cosh(w/T*x) – 1). My inputs into this equation are:


  • y(L/2): Sag at mid-span

  • w: distributed load

  • x: position along the cable with respect to the origin. The origin is located at the mid-span of the sagging catenary profile.

Given these inputs I am looking to solve for the minimum tension on the cable, denoted T in the above equation. So far I have been using excel to solve this by “trial-and-error” using the solver add-on. My approach, thus far, has been to rearrange the above equation to the following form: y(L/2)*w/T = cosh(w/T*x) – 1. This has allowed me to set a cell with the RHS – LHS and hence use solver to find a solution.
Some interesting outcomes I have found so far are:

  • I have compared the results to a parabolic cable profile and seem to be achieving correct results (for the most part)

  • This method does not always work

For a given set of inputs (listed above) the solution may not converge because of the starting value used for T in the iteration. I have found that tweaking my initial guess for T may sometimes lead to a solution but I was hoping to be able to solve for the correct solution without helping solver all the time.

To the point: is there a fundamentally better way of being able to solve for the minimum cable tension in this equation? I am looking to do this explicitly in excel so this means by iteration (as I have attempted above) or solving for an expression for T (this route doesn’t seem too friendly).

Any thoughts on how to best manipulate this equation?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is usual to assume the weight of cable is negligable compared to the (uniformly) distributed load.

Can this be assumed in this case?
 
  • #3
Here is a start.

Since there are no horizontal loads the horizontal component of the tension (T) is constant (H).

It may be found by taking the origin for an xy coordinate system as the lowest point and considering moments at some point along the cable at (x,y) about the origin (O).

Then if s is the length along the cable curve.

[tex]T = H\frac{{ds}}{{dx}} = H\sqrt {1 + {{\left( {\frac{{dy}}{{dx}}} \right)}^2}} [/tex]

For a symmetrical cable, horizontal length L, the tension is a max at L/2 and equals


[tex]{T_{\max }} = H\sqrt {1 + \frac{{16{d^2}}}{{{L^2}}}} [/tex]
 
  • #4
Studiot,

I am building in the self weight into the Uniformly Distributed Load (UDL). You are 100% correct in stating that the self weight of the catenary is negligible in comparison to my applied load. So in essence I am creating a hypothetically dense cable. Here is one example:

w = 1kN/m
Distance between supports, L = 3m
y(L/2) = 20mm


Graph of results

PkiuI.png
 
  • #5
Studiot,

Thanks for supplying those equations above - you have almost solved my problem. The only thing I am missing is how to find the horizontal component of force (H) in the cable seeing as I have two unknowns in the above equation. Is there another expression I can make use of?

Thanks for the help
 
  • #6
I almost have this solved! What does 'd' stand for in the Tmax formula?

Thanks!
 
  • #7
D id the drop of the catenary from suspension point to lowest.

Sorry. I should have said.
 
  • #8
Engineering01 said:
You are 100% correct in stating that the self weight of the catenary is negligible in comparison to my applied load.
I'm confused. A catenary arises from a cable with uniform mass density, no applied load. If you have a uniform (with horizontal distance) applied load and the cable mass is negligible in comparison (as with a suspension bridge), the cable will adopt a parabola.
Another interesting case (with no applied load) is to make the cable thickness vary so that the cross sectional area is proportional to the tension. This gives a cycloid, as I recall.
 
  • #9
As noted, the shape of the cable is parabolic, not that of a catenary, when uniformly loaded and the cable weight can be neglected. The minimum tension is the horizontal tension in the cable (H) which can be found by drawing a free body diagram through the low point of the span and around one end. Note that even if the cable is hanging just under its own weight and taking on the catenary shape, the catenary curve is very closely approximated by the parabola when the sag D is less than about 10 percent of the span; beyond that , the catenary and parabolic curves start to diverge.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Just how do you apply a

If you have a uniform (with horizontal distance) applied load

to a cable?

Yes if you could it would take on the shape of a parabola and terminology in this thread so far has been somewhat loose.

If you suspend a deck witha a UDL below a cable via a finite number of suspenders the shape is neither a catenary, nor a parabola, though not far from either.

The formula I listed for Tmax is based upon a parabola (y = 4x2d/L2) and works for small d/L.

Other forms of load, differential supports, stiffening decks etc you would have to rework the length of curve expression and substitute the actual for the parabola
 
  • #11
Studiot said:
Just how do you apply [that] to a cable?
Just trying to understand the requirement here. If the question is really about catenaries, why assume negligible self-weight?
 
  • #12
I have to admit I was thinking of bridges partly because I do and partly because a distributed 'load' was mentioned in th OP.

Of course for many, if not most, uses of load bearing suspended cables the weight of the cable is significant. Sometimes the cable weight is much greater than that of the load (catenary supports for communications cables) and may even be the only load (power cables).
 

1. What is tension force in catenary?

Tension force in catenary refers to the force applied by a cable or rope that is hanging freely between two points. It is the result of the weight of the cable itself and any additional weight or forces acting upon it.

2. How is tension force calculated in a catenary?

The equation for calculating tension force in a catenary is T = λ * cosh((x-x0)/λ), where T is the tension force, λ is the weight per unit length of the cable, x is the distance from the lowest point of the catenary, and x0 is the horizontal distance from the lowest point to the starting point of the catenary.

3. What factors affect tension force in a catenary?

The tension force in a catenary is affected by the weight of the cable, the horizontal distance between the two points, and any additional forces acting upon the cable, such as wind or external loads.

4. How is tension force in a catenary different from a straight cable?

Tension force in a catenary is different from a straight cable because the weight of the cable itself causes it to curve downwards between two points, resulting in a varying tension force along the length of the cable. In a straight cable, the tension force is constant throughout.

5. How is tension force in a catenary used in real life applications?

Tension force in a catenary is used in a variety of real-life applications, such as suspension bridges, power lines, and cable-stayed structures. It is also used in the design and construction of tents, hammocks, and other hanging structures. Understanding tension force in a catenary is crucial in ensuring the stability and safety of these structures.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
702
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
908
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
788
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
122
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top