Formation of the Moon: A Vibrating History

In summary, the moon is not hollow and the resonances detected were likely caused by an incident that occurred billions of years ago.
  • #1
verdigris
119
0
If something hit the Earth billions of years ago and caused a molten blob to be released from it,and this blob settled into a spherical shape,after vibrating a lot,could the moon still be vibrating because of a formation process like this?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess it could, but I don't think it is. The moon is tidally locked to the earth, which probably damped-out all of that. The moon does oscillate back and forth (librations), but those are due to the eccentricity of its orbit.
 
  • #3
Even if completely isolated in space, it seems unlikely such a large coherent vibration would last long before being distributed among other degrees of freedom and ultimately just radiated as heat. Much like the polhode motion of a GP-B gyro.
 
  • #4
Layman's terms: The Earth absorbs some of the vibrations of the moon, anf the moon is stabilized.
 
  • #5
verdigris said:
If something hit the Earth billions of years ago and caused a molten blob to be released from it,and this blob settled into a spherical shape,after vibrating a lot,could the moon still be vibrating because of a formation process like this?

The reason I was interested in this thread is because there was some information received during the moon walks and experiments that suggested the moon is hollow. The pings, or whatever method discovered this phenomenon, showed reverberation taking place in the moon's interior reaches.

Was the reverberation incorrectly diagnosed or is the moon actually hollow?
(death star?:devil: )

Some more legit and less legit (majority) references:

http://www.geocities.com/area51/hollow/8827/moonfacts.html

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=2410

Bad Astronomy: (debunks the idea)

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=18596

This one's right out there:

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html

This one asks "Is the moon hollow or made of swiss cheese"

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread30059/pg1

Here's where the idea may have come from...

"...when the Apollo 13 mission dropped a tank (fuel or oxygen?) on the Moon a seismometer showed that the Moon vibrated for over 3 hours."

http://bigbangblasted.mywowbb.com/forum1/8.html

This could go on indefinitely so I'll stop now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Thanks for the list baywax. I'll check them out sooner or later.
 
  • #7
Baywax, it should not be difficult to judge from the credibility of the sources you listed that the correct answer is that the moon is not hollow.

Nothing about the fact that vibrations were detected when a tank was dropped suggests the moon is hollow. IIRC, the Earth reverberated for weeks after that tsunami last year.
 
  • #8
russ_watters said:
Baywax, it should not be difficult to judge from the credibility of the sources you listed that the correct answer is that the moon is not hollow.

Nothing about the fact that vibrations were detected when a tank was dropped suggests the moon is hollow. IIRC, the Earth reverberated for weeks after that tsunami last year.

Thanks Russ. That probably solves the misconception, myth and waste of energy that's been put into this story.
 

1. How was the Moon formed?

The most widely accepted theory is the Giant Impact Hypothesis, which suggests that a Mars-sized object collided with the Earth early in its formation, ejecting debris that eventually formed the Moon.

2. How long did it take for the Moon to form?

It is estimated that the Moon formed approximately 4.5 billion years ago, around the same time as the Earth.

3. Why does the Moon have a different composition than the Earth?

The Giant Impact Hypothesis explains this difference, as the collision with the Mars-sized object would have caused the ejected debris to have a different composition than the Earth.

4. How did the Moon's orbit become stable?

It is believed that the Moon's orbit became stable due to tidal forces from the Earth, which caused the Moon to gradually move further away until it reached its current distance.

5. Are there other theories about the formation of the Moon?

Yes, there are other theories such as the Fission Theory, which suggests that the Moon was once part of the Earth and broke off due to centrifugal force, and the Capture Theory, which proposes that the Moon was formed elsewhere in the solar system and was captured by the Earth's gravitational pull. However, the Giant Impact Hypothesis is currently the most widely accepted theory.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
932
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
212
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top