Deriving the Derivative of 2^x

  • Thread starter hackensack
  • Start date
In summary: Huh?In summary, the Hackensack says that the derivative of y=2^x can be found using the exponential derivative rule and using the equation 2x=exln2. The Hackensack says that the derivative of y=2^x can be found using the exponential derivative rule and using the equation 2x=exln2. The Hackensack says that the derivative of y=2^x can be found using the equation 2x=exln2.
  • #1
hackensack
2
0
Hey, I've been tiring over this problem for a while...how do you get the derivitive of y=2^x using the definition of derivitive? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-Hackensack-
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hackensack said:
Hey, I've been tiring over this problem for a while...how do you get the derivitive of y=2^x using the definition of derivitive? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-Hackensack-
Hmm... You mean from first principles?

In case you don't already have it, there is a general rule for functions of the form:

[tex]f(x)\ =\ a^{u(x)}[/tex]. That rule is:

[tex]f'(x)\ =\ (a^{u(x)})[\ln(a)][u'(x)][/tex].

I'll have to think about how one would go about doing this from first principles. See http://library.thinkquest.org/C0110248/calculus/difnexp.htm?tqskip1=1&tqtime=0827 for proof of the exponential derivative rule.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
The simplest way to get the derivative is to use the equation:
2x=exln2
The derivative of the r.h.s is:
ln2.exln2=ln2.2x

To get the same result from first principles, expand the r.h.s. of the first equation in a power series, with x replaced by a (a=deltax), when you work on the difference quotient:
(2x+a-2x)/a
 
  • #4
I realize this has been posted up two times but they actually both confused me so I'd like to see if I can help make it a little clearer. (a is a constant)

[tex]y = a^x[/tex]

[tex]\ln y = \ln \left( a^x \right)[/tex]

[tex]\ln y = x \ln (a)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} \left( \frac{1}{y} \right) = \ln (a)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = y \ln(a)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = a^x \ln(a)[/tex]


Hope that helps, whenever differentiating [itex]f(x)^{g(x)}[/itex] it can be tackled in the same way.
 
  • #5
hackensack said:
Hey, I've been tiring over this problem for a while...how do you get the derivitive of y=2^x using the definition of derivitive? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-Hackensack-

If you really mean "using the definitionof the derivative then you would start this way:

y(x+h)- y(x)= 2x+h- 2x= 2x(2h-1) so

(y(x+h)- y(x))/h= 2x((2h- 1)/h)

The derivative is the limit of that as h->0.

Notice that the "2x" factor does not involve h while the "(2h-1)/h" factor does not involve x. The limit will be C2x where the constant C is the limit of (2h-1)/h. The hard part is proving that that limit is ln(2).
 
  • #6
:wink: (2^x) Lim ((1+1)^h -1)/h =
h-->0
=(2^x)Lim(1+h+h(h-1)/2!+h(h-1)(h-2)/3!+ - - - +(-1))/h=
h-->0
=(2^x)Lim(h+h(h-1)/2!+h(h-1)(h-2)/3!+ - - - -)/h =
h-->0
=(2^x)Lim(1+(h-1)/2!+(h-1)(h-2)/3!+ - - - -)
h-->0
=(2^x)(1-1/2!+2!/3!-3!/4!+ - + - + -)= (2^x)(1-1/2+1/3-1/4+1/5- + - +)

=(2^x)(ln2). I've just finished HallsofIvy's work.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
implicit diffy.
 
  • #8
I imagine that using a series expansion would involve the derivative anyway. May as well use L'Hospital's if you can do that...

cookiemonster
 
  • #9
cookiemonster said:
I imagine that using a series expansion would involve the derivative anyway. May as well use L'Hospital's if you can do that...

cookiemonster

If you were referring to wisky40's work, that was just an expansion using the binomial theorem, known long before calculus itself (and regularly used to find derivatives in the early days of calculus).
 
  • #10
I haven't tried this but i imagine this {lim(2^h - 1)/h = ln(2), as h -->0} can also be proven inductively.
 
  • #11
Gokul43201 said:
I haven't tried this but i imagine this {lim(2^h - 1)/h = ln(2), as h -->0} can also be proven inductively.

What is the statement P(n)? Is it this:

P(n): d(nx)/dx=(ln n)n2 for all integer n.

If so, then the proof (if it can be done inductively) will only be good for integer bases, and therefore won't apply to, say, base e. Zurtex's post, on the other hand, covers all real bases.
 
  • #12
HallsofIvy said:
If you were referring to wisky40's work, that was just an expansion using the binomial theorem, known long before calculus itself (and regularly used to find derivatives in the early days of calculus).

The binomial expansion is simply the taylor series of (x + 1)^n, is it not?

cookiemonster
 
  • #13
cookiemonster said:
The binomial expansion is simply the taylor series of (x + 1)^n, is it not?

cookiemonster

Therefore what? A power series expansion of any function is its Taylor series. My point was that it doesn't necessarily "involve the derivative". The fact that the coefficients are related to the derivative means that, if one has another way of finding a power series, one can use that to find the derivative- the whole point of this thread.

For example, it is easy to see that the Taylor's series (strictly speaking "McLaurin series") for f(x)= 1/(1- x) is 1+ x+ x2+ ... by using the sum of a geometric series (known long before the calculus) and from that deduce that f '(0)= 1, f"(0)= 2, and, in general, f(n)(0)= n!.
 
  • #14
the derivitive of 2^x(ln2)

Can somebody explain how to find the n'th derivitive of f(x)=2^x. After getting the first derivitive finding the second derivitive is giving me a lot of trouble.
 
  • #15
[tex]\frac {d} {dx} 2^x (ln2) = (ln2) \frac {d} {dx} 2^x = (ln2)^2 2^x= \frac {d^2} {dx^2} 2^x[/tex]

since ln2 is a constant, independent of x.

This can be repeated any number of times to give :

[tex] \frac {d^n} {dx^n} 2^x = (ln2)^n 2^x [/tex]
 
  • #16
Zurtex said:
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} \left( \frac{1}{y} \right) = \ln (a)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = y \ln(a)[/tex]


you can do that?
 
  • #17
cair0

Perhaps you misunderstood what Zurtex wrote:

(dy/dx) * (1/y) = ln(a)
dy/dx = y*ln(a)
 
  • #18
let y=2 ^ x
then log y = log 2^x
log y= x . log2

now, u can easily do this
 
  • #19
I posted a complete answer to this question today in the thead "introducing logarithms"
 

1. What is the formula for finding the derivative of 2^x?

The formula for finding the derivative of 2^x is d/dx(2^x) = ln(2) * 2^x. This means that the derivative of 2^x is equal to the natural logarithm of 2 (ln(2)) multiplied by 2^x.

2. How do you interpret the derivative of 2^x?

The derivative of 2^x represents the rate of change of the function 2^x at a specific point. It tells us how much the function is changing at that point and in what direction (increasing or decreasing).

3. What is the significance of ln(2) in the derivative of 2^x?

The natural logarithm of 2 (ln(2)) is significant because it is the constant multiplier in the derivative formula for 2^x. This value ensures that the derivative of 2^x is always proportional to the original function, making it a useful tool in many applications.

4. Can the derivative of 2^x be negative?

Yes, the derivative of 2^x can be negative. This means that the function 2^x is decreasing at that specific point. However, the derivative can also be positive or zero, depending on the value of x and the behavior of the function.

5. How is the derivative of 2^x used in real-world applications?

The derivative of 2^x is used in many real-world applications, particularly in the fields of economics, physics, and engineering. It can be used to model exponential growth and decay, calculate rates of change in various processes, and optimize systems for maximum efficiency.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
95
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
977
Replies
2
Views
169
Replies
4
Views
903
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
15
Views
233
  • Calculus
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top