Question about the Poynting vector

In summary: The magnitude of the wave is only constant across planes perpendicular to the wave's motion. The magnitude of the E and B fields still vary sinusoidally with z (parallel planes with a different z component have a different magnitude), so shouldn't the magnitude of the Poynting vector change with z?Maybe "amplitude" is a better word. Anyway, you are probably restricting your consideration to a particular instant in time. Think about what happens as time passes. There will be a particular maximum value for E and B at a given point, and, since you are talking about a plane wave, this value is the same for every point. The phase is an arbitrary choice that you make, and is no
  • #1
fishh
6
1
Suppose I have a monochromatic electromagnetic plane wave with the E-field linearly polarized in the x-direction (and the B-field linearly polarized in the y-direction). Then the Poynting vector should be pointing in the z direction with a magnitude equal to the product of the B and E-field magnitudes divided by the magnetic constant. But because they are complex, the magnitudes of the B and E field don't depend on time or position, which doesn't make sense, as the Poynting vector shouldn't be constant over all time. Of course, this can be solved by taking only the real parts of both solutions and multiplying them, but this would require breaking up the complex exponentials into cosines and sines. Is there anyway to do this without having to break up the complex exponentials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Poynting vector is

[tex]\mathbf{S} = \mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H} [/tex]

not

[tex]\mathbf{S} \neq |\mathbf{E}|\times|\mathbf{H}| [/tex]

If the fields vary in time, so does the Poynting vector.
 
  • #3
Born2bwire said:
The Poynting vector is

[tex]\mathbf{S} = \mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H} [/tex]

not

[tex]\mathbf{S} \neq |\mathbf{E}|\times|\mathbf{H}| [/tex]

If the fields vary in time, so does the Poynting vector.

Well that's true, but if I have an E-field like

[tex]E_0 \hat{x} e^{-i(kz -\omega t)}[/tex]

And consequently, a B-field like

[tex] B_0 \hat{y} e^{-i(kz - \omega t)} [/tex]

Then shouldn't the magnitude of the Poynting vector just be [tex]|\mathbf{S}| = |\mathbf{E}||\mathbf{H}| = \frac{E_0 B_0}{\mu_0}[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
fishh said:
Well that's true, but if I have an E-field like

[tex]E_0 \hat{x} e^{-i(kz -\omega t)}[/tex]

And consequently, a B-field like

[tex] B_0 \hat{y} e^{-i(kz - \omega t)} [/tex]

Then shouldn't the magnitude of the Poynting vector just be [tex]|\mathbf{S}| = |\mathbf{E}||\mathbf{H}| = \frac{E_0 B_0}{\mu_0}[/tex]?

In this case, yes.
 
  • #5
Hi,

A small question concerning the calculation above.
When we take the expressions for E and B and evalute the cross product, the obtained result is a vector or a vector field ?

In other words, given a EM wave field it correct to say that the Poyinting Vector is also a vector field ?

Thank you in advance,

Best Regards,

DaTario
 
  • #6
DaTario said:
Hi,

A small question concerning the calculation above.
When we take the expressions for E and B and evalute the cross product, the obtained result is a vector or a vector field ?

In other words, given a EM wave field it correct to say that the Poyinting Vector is also a vector field ?

Thank you in advance,

Best Regards,

DaTario

I think it is a vector field, as every z position has a different E and B field and thus, a different Poynting vector.

I'm not sure if the calculation I did was correct; a plane wave should not have a constant Poynting vector, as there are points where the E and B field are 0, and the magnitude of the Poynting vector should also be 0. I think there should be a sinusoidal dependence on z and t, but whenever I use complex exponentials, the dependence vanishes...
 
  • #7
fishh said:
I think it is a vector field, as every z position has a different E and B field and thus, a different Poynting vector.

I'm not sure if the calculation I did was correct; a plane wave should not have a constant Poynting vector, as there are points where the E and B field are 0, and the magnitude of the Poynting vector should also be 0. I think there should be a sinusoidal dependence on z and t, but whenever I use complex exponentials, the dependence vanishes...

A plane wave has constant magnitude and the example you gave maintains a constant phase relationship between the two fields, so of course its Poynting vector also has constant magnitude.
 
  • #8
Born2bwire said:
A plane wave has constant magnitude and the example you gave maintains a constant phase relationship between the two fields, so of course its Poynting vector also has constant magnitude.

The magnitude of the wave is only constant across planes perpendicular to the wave's motion. The magnitude of the E and B fields still vary sinusoidally with z (parallel planes with a different z component have a different magnitude), so shouldn't the magnitude of the Poynting vector change with z?
 
  • #9
Maybe "amplitude" is a better word. Anyway, you are probably restricting your consideration to a particular instant in time. Think about what happens as time passes. There will be a particular maximum value for E and B at a given point, and, since you are talking about a plane wave, this value is the same for every point. The phase is an arbitrary choice that you make, and is no more physical than the location of z=0.
 
  • #10
Born2bwire said:
The Poynting vector is

[tex]\mathbf{S} = \mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H} [/tex]
...
When using the complex amplitudes, I believe that the expression should be

[tex]\mathbf{S}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H}^*[/tex]

This is the complex Poynting vector. The exponential factors that make the E and B fields a plane wave cancel out, due to the complex conjugation.
 

1. What is the Poynting vector?

The Poynting vector is a mathematical quantity used in electromagnetism to describe the directional flow of energy in an electromagnetic field. It is represented by the symbol S and has units of watts per square meter (W/m^2).

2. How is the Poynting vector calculated?

The Poynting vector is calculated by taking the cross product of the electric field vector E and the magnetic field vector B, multiplied by the permeability of free space (μ0). The resulting equation is S = E x B / μ0.

3. What is the significance of the Poynting vector?

The Poynting vector is significant because it represents the direction and magnitude of energy transfer in an electromagnetic field. It is used to calculate the rate of energy flow, as well as the direction in which the energy is flowing.

4. Can the Poynting vector be negative?

Yes, the Poynting vector can have a negative value. This indicates that the energy is flowing in the opposite direction of the vector. However, the magnitude of the vector is always positive.

5. What is the unit of measurement for the Poynting vector?

The unit of measurement for the Poynting vector is watts per square meter (W/m^2). This unit represents the amount of power per unit area that is being transferred by the electromagnetic field.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
546
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
7
Replies
236
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
723
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
739
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top