What do we mean when we say on shell particles?

In summary, particles in on shell satisfy the equations of motion, while off shell particles do not. Off shell occurs only in the middle of calculations, never at the beginning or end. Energy and momentum conservation applies to both on shell and off shell equations (but E2 = p2 + m2, which applies to each particle individually, does not apply off shell). Unless you're doing Feynman diagrams and the Dyson expansion (a math technique in Quantum Field heory), you won't come across off shell.
  • #1
ylem
32
1
What do we mean when we say "on shell" particles?

Hello!

What do we mean when we say a particle in on shell? What is off shell? I gather it is related to energy and momentum conservation to say if a process is possible, but I've no idea what it actually is. Is it something to do with writing E^2 = p^2 + m^2?

Cheers,

Samantha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


By on-shell one means "satisfying the equations of motion". For relativistic particles this indeed includes the property that the particle satisfies the energy-mass relation: E^2 = p^2 + m^2.

But it's a broader concept than that. For instance, Noether's theorem links conserved quantities to symmetries of the system. But this theorem only holds on-shell.
 
  • #3


xepma said:
By on-shell one means "satisfying the equations of motion". For relativistic particles this indeed includes the property that the particle satisfies the energy-mass relation: E^2 = p^2 + m^2.

But it's a broader concept than that. For instance, Noether's theorem links conserved quantities to symmetries of the system. But this theorem only holds on-shell.

When one makes calculations of scattering initially and finally free particles, there involved solutions of the "free" equations of motion. In these solutions the energy is determined with the particle momentum. They say such particles are "on shell", meaning E(p) equation is a constraint to four-vector p. The Noether's theorem gives conserved values if they are expressed via solutions rather than via unknown variables.

If one makes calculations with help of Fourier representation, they are expressed via Fourier variables denoted historically also as p (also four variables used in the Fourier integrals). As soon as these variables are independent of each other, they are not bound by any relationship, so the combination E(p) takes non-physical values (E(p) is just meaningless). They say "off shell" or virtual particles. So any actual calculation includes on- and off-shell "particles".

Bob.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ylem said:
Hello!

What do we mean when we say a particle in on shell? What is off shell? I gather it is related to energy and momentum conservation to say if a process is possible, but I've no idea what it actually is. Is it something to do with writing E^2 = p^2 + m^2?

Cheers,

Samantha

Hello Samantha! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

On shell means real (physical), and is E2 = p2 + m2.

Off shell means not real (not physical), and is only used in the maths.

Off shell occurs only in the middle of calculations, never at the beginning or end.

Energy and momentum conservation applies to both on shell and off shell equations (but E2 = p2 + m2, which applies to each particle individually, does not apply off shell).

Unless you're doing Feynman diagrams and the Dyson expansion (a math technique in Quantum Field heory), you won't come across off shell. :wink:
 
  • #5


Thank you all very much for your help. :-) However, how could I tell if a process is possible for on-shell particles? So... picking a simple process a photon annihilating to give an electron and positron. How can I determine if this is possible for on-shell particles?

Cheers, Samantha
 

1. What is the definition of "on shell" particles?

"On shell" particles refer to particles that satisfy the equations of motion for a given physical system. In other words, they are particles that exist within the allowed energy and momentum states of the system.

2. How do on shell particles differ from off shell particles?

Off shell particles do not satisfy the equations of motion for a given physical system and therefore do not exist within the allowed energy and momentum states. They are typically virtual particles that exist only for a short period of time during interactions.

3. What is the significance of on shell particles in particle physics?

On shell particles are important because they represent the physical particles that we observe and measure in experiments. They follow the laws of conservation of energy and momentum and are essential for understanding the behavior of physical systems.

4. How are on shell particles detected and measured?

On shell particles can be detected and measured through various methods, such as particle accelerators, detectors, and other experimental techniques. These methods allow scientists to observe the interactions and properties of on shell particles.

5. Can particles be both on shell and off shell at the same time?

No, particles can only be either on shell or off shell at a given time. However, a particle can transition between being on shell and off shell during an interaction, depending on the energy and momentum of the system.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
238
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
462
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top