QM Puzzle: Can One Particle Have Multiple States?

In summary, the conversation discusses the principles of superposition and Pauli exclusion in quantum mechanics. It explains how an electron can exist partially in multiple states simultaneously and how this does not violate the exclusion principle. The concept of indistinguishability of electrons is also mentioned.
  • #1
aaronsky12
3
0
I was taught that a particle is assigned to a unique quantum state. As a specific example, two bound electrons can't have the same quantum numbers in an atom. And likewise one and only bound electron is assigned to one quantum state in an atom. Yet, I am reading several solid state books and they are saying that an electron moving in a conductive material (crystal lattice) can be described by a localized wavepacket with a group velocity and central energy... That makes sense intuitively... but wavepackets are themeselves superpositions of sinusoidal traveling wave solutions to shrodinger's equation (each with a wavevector k)... This makes it sound like one particle is assigned several wavefunctions (each with their own quantum numbers)... How can this be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3


Have not you heard that an arbitrary wave can be expressed by superposition of many plane waves(provided complete sets) and also schrodinger eqn is linear so it should hold.
 
  • #4


Thanks bhobba and andrien! OK, here is a related follow up question... First let me quote the wiki pages for the superposition principle and Pauli Exclusion principle state:

"[Quantum superposition] holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular, theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but, when measured, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics)."

"The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously."

My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle. It makes sense that one electron can exist in state A and another electron in B. But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?
 
  • #5


aaronsky12 said:
Thanks bhobba and andrien! OK, here is a related follow up question... First let me quote the wiki pages for the superposition principle and Pauli Exclusion principle state:

"[Quantum superposition] holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular, theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but, when measured, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics)."

"The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously."

My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle. It makes sense that one electron can exist in state A and another electron in B. But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?

A state is the complete information for a particle.So how is it possible that an electron can be in two states simultaneously.
 
  • #6


But can one electron exist partially in state A and B, while the other also exists in partially state A and B at the same time?
Yes. For example take a spin-1/2 system like an electron, and consider the eigenstates of Sz, call them |z,+> and |z,->, and compare these to the eigenstates of Sx, call them |x,+> and |x,->. The relationship is |z,+> = (1/√2)(|x,+> + |x,->) and |z,-> = (1/√2)(|x,+> - |x,->).

So if you have electron A in the state |z,+> and electron B in the state |z,->, you can say that they are both partially in states |x,+> and |x,->.
 
  • #7


aaronsky12 said:
My question is: Can two electrons "share" states and not violate the exclusion principle.
Electrons are fermions and cannot occupy the same quantum state. This is taken care of by the PEP. Photons(bosons) on the other hand can, hence light is not solid.
 
Last edited:
  • #8


Electrons are fermions and cannot occupy the same quantum state.
Quite right. Nonetheless, two fermions may occupy orthogonal linear combinations of the same states, as I have just described.
 
  • #9


Bill_K said:
Quite right. Nonetheless, two fermions may occupy orthogonal linear combinations of the same states, as I have just described.
Even more: They have to occupy linear combinations. Electrons are indistinguishable - you cannot have "electron A in state a" and "electron B in state b", as "electron A" and "electron B" do not exist as different objects.
 
  • #10


Bill_K said:
Yes. For example take a spin-1/2 system like an electron, and consider the eigenstates of Sz, call them |z,+> and |z,->, and compare these to the eigenstates of Sx, call them |x,+> and |x,->. The relationship is |z,+> = (1/√2)(|x,+> + |x,->) and |z,-> = (1/√2)(|x,+> - |x,->).

So if you have electron A in the state |z,+> and electron B in the state |z,->, you can say that they are both partially in states |x,+> and |x,->.

But is not the state |z,+> and |z,-> represents two different state.so will it be safe to say that electron existing in one state is definitely independent of the other,as is the case here.
 

1. What is the QM puzzle about one particle having multiple states?

The QM puzzle about one particle having multiple states is a thought experiment that challenges the principles of quantum mechanics. It questions whether a single particle can exist in two or more states simultaneously.

2. How does the QM puzzle relate to the principles of quantum mechanics?

The QM puzzle directly challenges some of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and wave-particle duality. It forces scientists to reconsider their understanding of these principles and potentially revise their theories.

3. Can a particle really exist in multiple states at the same time?

Currently, there is no definitive answer to this question. Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, suggest that a particle can indeed exist in multiple states simultaneously. However, other interpretations, such as the Many-Worlds interpretation, offer alternative explanations for the QM puzzle.

4. What are the implications of the QM puzzle?

If the QM puzzle is proven to be true, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the physical world. It may require a reevaluation of our current theories and could potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in the field of quantum mechanics.

5. Is there any evidence to support the QM puzzle?

Currently, there is no concrete evidence to support the QM puzzle. It remains a thought experiment and a subject of theoretical debate among scientists. However, ongoing research and advancements in technology may eventually provide evidence to either confirm or disprove the puzzle.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
131
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
134
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
854
Replies
2
Views
801
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
910
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top