Dont call yourself an physicist/engineer/mathematician

  • Engineering
  • Thread starter Devils
  • Start date
In summary, the attached blog post provides valuable advice for career advancement in any industry, particularly in the software industry. It emphasizes the importance of communication and positioning oneself as a solution provider rather than just a technical expert. The post also discusses the realities of the "real world" and how traditional education may not prepare individuals for it. It suggests further reading on negotiation, understanding modern organizations, and improving personal interactions. In summary, the key to success in one's career is not just technical skills, but also understanding the business side and constantly improving oneself.
  • #1
Devils
198
17
There seem to be many people finding jobs in their chosen profession, or for some people find a job at all. The attached blog post gives sound advice about selling yourself and career advancement.Its written for the software industry but the advice is generally applicable.

Unless you are in academia or pure science, you will probably be employed in the "real world" or "business world". The rules of survival in the "real world" have NOTHING to do with what you learned in your STEM (science, technology, engineering, maths, education). You are smart but that's not good enough, you need to learn to play the games corporations play.

Your most important professional skill is communication:


Please read this blog post http://www.kalzumeus.com/2011/10/28/dont-call-yourself-a-programmer/

Don't Call Yourself A Programmer, And Other Career Advice
If there was one course I could add to every engineering education, it wouldn’t involve compilers or gates or time complexity. It would be Realities Of Your Industry 101, because we don’t teach them and this results in lots of unnecessary pain and suffering. This post aspires to be README.txt for your career as a young engineer. The goal is to make you happy, by filling in the gaps in your education regarding how the “real world” actually works. It took me about ten years and a lot of suffering to figure out some of this, starting from “fairly bright engineer with low self-confidence and zero practical knowledge of business.” I wouldn’t trust this as the definitive guide, but hopefully it will provide value over what your college Career Center isn’t telling you.

Quote: "Instead, describe yourself by what you have accomplished for previously employers vis-a-vis increasing revenues or reducing costs." You need to be thought of as a "solution provider" ( a readily transferable skill), not be pigeon-holed into narrow technical skills. For example you make want to call yourself a "data scientist" instead of an expert on SQL Server version X.Y.Z.

Edited list of major topics in the blog post:
90% of programming jobs are in creating Line of Business software:
Engineers are hired to create business value, not to program things:
You really want to be attached to Profit Centers
Don’t call yourself a programmer/engineer/physicist
You are not defined by the tools you use
Co-workers and bosses are not usually your friends:
You radically overestimate the average skill of the competition because of the crowd you hang around with:
“Read ad. Send in resume. Go to job interview. Receive offer.” is the exception, not the typical case, for getting employment:
Networking: it isn’t just for TCP packets:
Academia is not like the real world:
People who are skilled in negotiation make more than those who are not.
How do I become better at negotiation?
Modesty is not a career-enhancing character trait:
At the end of the day, your life happiness will not be dominated by your career.

Know how modern organisations think
Peter Drucker invented the modern science of management. Know how this style of thinking, that permeates governments and organisations everywhere, will help you get jobs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Drucker#Key_ideas


Further Reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Win_Friends_and_Influence_People
https://www.stephencovey.com/7habits/7habits.php
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0060724277/?tag=pfamazon01-20 ( a little bit of psychology)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I find it funny that the seven habits book by stephen covey goes against the original advice of the article you quoted.

personally, I would go by the seven habits book, the writer's experience is vital.
 
  • #3
montadhar said:
I find it funny that the seven habits book by stephen covey goes against the original advice of the article you quoted.

personally, I would go by the seven habits book, the writer's experience is vital.

I don't see that at all, they are about different things.

The Cover book says concentrate on improving (moral) character rather than personality. There are many books out there that are about improving personality traits, but many traits are fixed ie you can't really change from being an introvert to extravert.

Harris's book on transactional analysis gives insights into personal interactions, and is useful to know in the workplace.
 
  • #4
Devils said:
There seem to be many people finding jobs in their chosen profession, or for some people find a job at all.

Presumably you meant, "There seem to be many people [having difficulty] finding jobs in their chosen profession, or for some people find a job at all."?
 
  • #5


I agree with the advice given in this blog post. It is important for individuals in STEM fields to understand the realities of the industry and how to effectively communicate their skills and achievements to potential employers. The advice to not limit oneself by narrow technical skills and to focus on being a solution provider is crucial in today's job market. Additionally, the emphasis on networking and understanding the principles of modern management is valuable for career advancement. As scientists, we often focus solely on our technical skills and neglect the importance of communication and networking, which can hold us back in our careers. I highly recommend further reading on the topics mentioned, as they can greatly benefit individuals in any profession, including those in STEM fields.
 

What does it mean to be a physicist/engineer/mathematician?

Being a physicist/engineer/mathematician means that you have extensive knowledge and expertise in the field of physics, engineering, or mathematics. You have a deep understanding of the principles, theories, and applications of these subjects.

What are the differences between a physicist, engineer, and mathematician?

A physicist focuses on understanding the fundamental laws and principles of the natural world and uses mathematical models to explain and predict physical phenomena. An engineer applies scientific and mathematical principles to design, build, and improve practical solutions to real-world problems. A mathematician explores abstract concepts and develops theories and techniques to solve mathematical problems.

Can someone be both a physicist and an engineer or mathematician?

Yes, it is possible for someone to have expertise or knowledge in multiple fields such as physics, engineering, and mathematics. However, it is rare for someone to have an equally in-depth understanding of all three fields.

Why is it important to not call oneself a physicist/engineer/mathematician if they do not have proper qualifications or expertise?

Using these titles without proper qualifications or expertise can be misleading and can potentially harm the reputation of the fields. It is important to have the necessary education, training, and experience to truly be considered a physicist, engineer, or mathematician.

What are some examples of jobs that fall under the category of physicist/engineer/mathematician?

Some examples of jobs that fall under these categories include research scientists, aerospace engineers, data analysts, and operations researchers. However, these titles can also encompass a wide range of subfields and industries, so it is not an exhaustive list.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
652
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top