YouTube Classics: Watch & Learn Kids

  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Youtube
In summary, this conversation covers a wide range of topics, from comedic videos and commercials to impressive talents and performances. Participants share their thoughts and opinions on various videos and also reminisce about childhood memories. Some notable videos mentioned include a hilarious commercial about a kid throwing a tantrum and his mom's unexpected reaction, a funny World of Warcraft funeral crashers video, a brave climber scaling a rock with no ropes, and a clever artist animation of a Mars rover. The conversation also touches on politics and news media with discussions about biased reporting and a zinger from Jon Stewart. Overall, the conversation is filled with humor and interesting content, making for an entertaining read.
  • #736
Well, Bill Maher is a moron. I guess some people find him humorous, like some people think seeing a dog get dragged by a truck is humorous. I think he's an idiot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #737
Evo said:
Well, Bill Maher is a moron. I guess some people find him humorous, like some people think seeing a dog get dragged by a truck is humorous. I think he's an idiot.
Please forgive my illiteracy, but I do not see how this opinion is relevant to the previous video, which you have full power to remove. Besides, "moron" defines as
idiot: a person of subnormal intelligence
(wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn)
Moron is a controversial term once used in psychology to denote a category of mental retardation.
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology))
which I can not agree applies to this individual.
 
  • #738
humanino said:
Please forgive my illiteracy, but I do not see how this opinion is relevant to the previous video, which you have full power to remove. Besides, "moron" defines as
idiot: a person of subnormal intelligence
(wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn)
Moron is a controversial term once used in psychology to denote a category of mental retardation.
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology))
which I can not agree applies to this individual.
If you see enough clips of his tv show, you might agree. But for now, we'll just say that is my opinion. Moron now means someone that doesn't use normal judgement, for example, a tv show host, like Maher, just trying to get ratings.

Moron=jerk=jackass=someone that will do anything to get tv ratings
 
  • #739
Evo said:
If you see enough clips of his tv show, you might agree.
I think I would disagree on much if not most of what Maher says, and he also seem to me to be very much on a quest for ratings.

Maybe the reason I thought the above video was funny is that once I was french :smile:
 
  • #740
If this isn't a classic it soon will be...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="[URL]http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #741
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6EJfM59ZO4
 
  • #742
Evo said:
Well, Bill Maher is a moron. I guess some people find him humorous, like some people think seeing a dog get dragged by a truck is humorous. I think he's an idiot.
Instead of throwing insults at him, why not actually try to refute what he's saying? And he doesn't do anything for ratings, he's just that kind of person; he's been like that for the nearly two decades he's been on television. Like when he made that 9/11 comment that got him fired, I doubt he did that for ratings...
 
Last edited:
  • #743
I didn't go through all 38 pages to see if it had been posted before but, this is a favorite of mine.
This guy has nerves of steel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHGvMd9vwbc
 
  • #744
Poor Renault Twingo.
 
  • #745
This is so funny. Thanks to Red Rum for this one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osoVBtxXyfc
 
  • #746
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #747
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/64qXe2JH72w&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/64qXe2JH72w&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

"Besides, there's an easier way to enjoy pseudo, life-like, robotic sex: get married." LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #748
rootX said:


That's from the Jackie Chan movie "Who Am I". It's like someone purposely put it in bad quality to make it look like it's actual security camera footage or something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #749
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/znnFmTuGVyc&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/znnFmTuGVyc&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #750
leroyjenkens said:
That's from the Jackie Chan movie "Who Am I". It's like someone purposely put it in bad quality to make it look like it's actual security camera footage or something.

thank you



tokyo drift is much better :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #751
FredGarvin said:
If this isn't a classic it soon will be...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="[URL]http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RJlPEHL85Ig&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

:bugeye::yuck:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #752
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sshPiEUGyZ8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sshPiEUGyZ8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #753
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2rW1alVv8
 
  • #754
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #755
There was an interesting crash test between a brand new Renault Modus (small car) and a 90's Volvo (large car). Surprisingly the modus won.
 
  • #756
Astronuc said:
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.




They even included fuzzy dice hanging from the rear view in the Bel Air...:cool:.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #757
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDuQOgItebM
 
  • #758
Don't do this at home or on the streets or anywhere else for that matter - unless you're really good!

Inspired. Danny MacAskill

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #759
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3455GI_uGs4
 
  • #760
I like this video. My friend made it, he is an aspiring director. I play a short part in it also. It's a spoof on those old 1970's movie trailers for action movies. With corny lines and all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #761
Astronuc said:
Crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air with both going 40 mph (64 km/h) and the vehicles collide offset, driver side to driver side. This is the same crash configuration represented by the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset barrier test, which is used to rate the frontal crash performance of new cars.




I'm thinking the driver of the Malibu would fair better. I'm surprised how badly the passenger compartment of the Bel-Air is distorted considering how big it is (plus bouncing off all of those hard parts in the interior can't be too good even if the passenger compartment maintained its shape).

Note that neither car goes backward. The battle of momentum is a draw and the cars rotate around each other.

Here's some tests between mini/micro cars and mid-size cars. Even if they designed a stronger passenger compartment, it's tough to get around the fact that the driver that was once going 40 mph forward is suddenly going backward.

Micro/Mini crash tests
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #762
Muppet Bohemian Rhapsody. These guys made my night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgbNymZ7vqY
 
  • #763
GeorginaS said:
Muppet Bohemian Rhapsody. These guys made my night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgbNymZ7vqY

Wow. I think Freddy and Jim would both approve.

Thank's G!
 
  • #764
:biggrin:
 
  • #766
Not for kids:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFCCFS_lhA8
 
  • #767
My favorite commercial:



Yeah, they take a little dramatic license there. The spacecraft and uniforms look more like they came from the art department than the engineering section and it obviously takes more than 30 seconds to maneuver a satellite out of the way of debris.

And, the JSpOC monitors objects in space - the satellites are actually controlled from various other places, but you have to take some liberties to compress that scenario into 30 seconds.

In fact, the real process usually takes a few weeks since you're usually avoiding dead debris affected only by natural forces and you want to incorporate the collision avoidance maneuvers into normal station keeping maneuvers to conserve fuel. But, the overall concept is accurate, even if not quite as exciting as the commercial.

They filimed the commercial at a real Air Force facility and used Air Force personnel instead of actors (but they did such a good job you probably can't tell they're not professional actors :rofl:). One of the people I work with is young enough that she's actually worked with about half the people in the commercial.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #768
Borek said:
Not for kids:
I had to watch it two times before I got it! So I guess I am half a kid :)
 
  • #770
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3jBMooa0TM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3jBMooa0TM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
517
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
712
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
808
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
435
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
939
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top