2012 Gravity essay contest results

In summary: The model has a certain appeal to me. The model takes a TOE view, has a Hilbert space, and yet is non-local, and has deBroglie-Bohm pilot waves. I am a fan of all 3 of those general features.Of course, the big thing is that they have to show they can make it work as a cosmological model. As they say, it is still a work in progress. But their approach is not only to simply postulate the existence of dark energy, but to show that dark energy is not needed.I can't resist. I will add a summary for that one as well.In summary, the essay "Explaining the Supernova Data without
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org/pdf/abstracts/2012abstracts.pdf
Ted Jacobson got honorable mention with this one
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6349
Gravitation and vacuum entanglement entropy
Ted Jacobson
(Submitted on 28 Apr 2012)
The vacuum of quantum fields contains correlated fluctuations. When restricted to one side of a surface these have a huge entropy of entanglement that scales with the surface area. If UV physics renders this entropy finite, then a thermodynamic argument implies the existence of gravity. That is, the causal structure of spacetime must be dynamical and governed by the Einstein equation with Newton's constant inversely proportional to the entropy density. Conversely, the existence of gravity makes the entanglement entropy finite. This thermodynamic reasoning is powerful despite the lack of a detailed description of the dynamics at the cutoff scale, but it has its limitations. In particular, we should not expect to understand corrections to Einstein gravity in this way.
Comments: 9 pages; Essay written for the Gravity Research Foundation 2012 Awards for Essays on Gravitation

Rovelli teamed up with Aldo Riello and Marios Christodoulou to write an essay that also won honorable mention.
How to Measure an Anti-Spacetime by Marios Christodoulou, Aldo Riello, Carlo Rovelli, Centre de Physique Théorique, Case 907, Luminy, F-13288 Marseille, EU;
Abstract – Can a spacetime region with a negative lapse function be detected, in principle? Fermions do not couple to the metric field and require a tetrad field: we show that this implies that a fermion interference effect could detect a negative lapse region, distinguishing “forward evolving” from “backward evolving” spacetimes having a gravitational field described by the same metric.Bill Stuckey, Tim McDevitt, and Mike Silberstein won hon. mention with their essay.
Explaining the Supernova Data without Accelerating Expansion– by W.M.Stuckey1, T.J.McDevitt,2 and M.Silberstein3,
Abstract – The 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded “for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae”. However, it is not the case that the type 1a supernova data necessitates accelerating expansion. Since we do not have a successful theory of quantum gravity, we should not assume general relativity (GR) will survive unification intact, especially on cosmological scales where tests are scarce. We provide a simple example of how GR cosmology may be modified to produce a decelerating Einstein-de Sitter cosmology model (EdS) that accounts for the Union2 Compilation data as well as the accelerating ΛCDM (EdS plus a cosmological constant).

Ben Crowell did with his too:
Tricritical Quantum Point and Inflationary Cosmology by Lawrence B. Crowell, Alpha Institute of Advanced Study 10600 Cibola Lp 311 NW Albuquerque, NM 87114 and 11 Rutafa Street, H-1165 Budapest, Hungary; e-mail: lcrowellATswcpDOTcom
Abstract – The holographic protection due to inflationary cosmology is a consequence of a quantum tricritical point. In this scenario, a closed spacetime solution transitions into an inflationary de Sitter spacetime. The saturation of the holographic entropy bound is prevented by the phase structure of the system which changes the topology of the early universe. Feel free to add other authors, titles and/or links. Time permitting I will, later on today, as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Correction. I confused L. B. Crowell with B. Crowell in the previous post. Different author.

===============

The essay which won 3rd prize in the 2012 GRF contest was posted on Arxiv today:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3291
The Unbearable Beingness of Light, Dressing and Undressing Photons in Black Hole Spacetimes
Timothy J. Hollowood, Graham M. Shore
(Submitted on 15 May 2012)
Gravitational tidal forces acting on the virtual e+ e- cloud surrounding a photon endow spacetime with a non-trivial refractive index. This has remarkable properties unique to gravitational theories including superluminal low-frequency propagation, in apparent violation of causality, and amplification of the renormalized photon field, in apparent violation of unitarity. Using the geometry of null congruences and the Penrose limit, we illustrate these phenomena and their resolution by tracing the history of a photon as it falls into the near-singularity region of a black hole.
8 pages, Essay awarded third prize in the Gravity Research Foundation essay competition 2012
 
  • #3
marcus said:
Ben Crowell did with his too:
Tricritical Quantum Point and Inflationary Cosmology by Lawrence B. Crowell, Alpha Institute of Advanced Study 10600 Cibola Lp 311 NW Albuquerque, NM 87114 and 11 Rutafa Street, H-1165 Budapest, Hungary; e-mail: lcrowellATswcpDOTcom
Abstract – The holographic protection due to inflationary cosmology is a consequence of a quantum tricritical point. In this scenario, a closed spacetime solution transitions into an inflationary de Sitter spacetime. The saturation of the holographic entropy bound is prevented by the phase structure of the system which changes the topology of the early universe.

B = Ben?
 
  • #4
marcus said:
Correction. I confused L. B. Crowell with B. Crowell in the previous post. Different author.
Simple error. I misremembered something earlier today, then realized, and fixed it later.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
marcus said:
Bill Stuckey, Tim McDevitt, and Mike Silberstein won hon. mention with their essay.

Explaining the Supernova Data without Accelerating Expansion– by W.M.Stuckey1, T.J.McDevitt,2 and M.Silberstein3,
Abstract – The 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded “for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae”. However, it is not the case that the type 1a supernova data necessitates accelerating expansion. Since we do not have a successful theory of quantum gravity, we should not assume general relativity (GR) will survive unification intact, especially on cosmological scales where tests are scarce. We provide a simple example of how GR cosmology may be modified to produce a decelerating Einstein-de Sitter cosmology model (EdS) that accounts for the Union2 Compilation data as well as the accelerating ΛCDM (EdS plus a cosmological constant).

Stuckey is a PF Member and posts here from time to time. :smile:

Their work is exciting, obviously going against the grain regarding accelerating expansion. Their cosmological model is based on some adjustments due to their quantum model, "Relational Blockworld: A Path Integral Based Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory". This in turn features general agreement to standard QM but has a feature or two that shows up at larger distances/timescales. Worth a look:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3973
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4348
 

1. What is the "2012 Gravity essay contest"?

The "2012 Gravity essay contest" was a global competition held in 2012 to encourage students and researchers to explore the topic of gravity and its effects on our daily lives.

2. Who organized the "2012 Gravity essay contest"?

The "2012 Gravity essay contest" was organized by a group of scientists and educators from various universities and research institutions around the world.

3. What were the results of the "2012 Gravity essay contest"?

The results of the "2012 Gravity essay contest" included a variety of essays from students and researchers, showcasing their ideas and understanding of gravity. The top three winners were awarded cash prizes and their essays were published in a scientific journal.

4. How were the winners of the "2012 Gravity essay contest" selected?

The winners of the "2012 Gravity essay contest" were selected by a panel of expert judges based on the scientific accuracy, originality, and clarity of their essays.

5. What impact did the "2012 Gravity essay contest" have on the scientific community?

The "2012 Gravity essay contest" sparked interest and discussion among scientists and researchers about the topic of gravity, leading to new ideas and collaborations. It also helped to promote the importance of science education and public understanding of science.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
27
Views
14K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
35
Views
17K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
23
Views
9K
Back
Top