New Reply

Must photons have motion?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb18-13, 07:06 PM   #1
 

Must photons have motion?


These are not facetious questions. Is a photon at rest still a photon? Can a photon be at rest?

Thanks
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Iron-platinum alloys could be new-generation hard drives
>> Lab sets a new record for creating heralded photons
>> Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze
Feb18-13, 07:08 PM   #2
 
No, photons only exists at the speed of light. Since the speed of light is absolute, Photons can not be at rest.
 
Feb18-13, 07:13 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
A frame at rest, aka an inertial frame, will measure the speed of light as c at all times. Light itself cannot have a rest frame.
 
Feb18-13, 09:06 PM   #4
 

Must photons have motion?


In a vacuum, no. But in a specially prepared medium, maybe? http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=28520
 
Feb19-13, 12:04 PM   #5
 
Quote by Khashishi View Post
In a vacuum, no. But in a specially prepared medium, maybe? http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=28520
Very interesting, but the key phrase is " "quantum mechanical magic trick". If two high energy photons come together and create a particle, this particle has NO internal constituents relating to the two photons. So from energy comes mass, but this mass is in no way connected to the two photons. Theoretically, We can move that mass, and slow it down, but this is not the same as slowing down the two photons that created it. Fascinating though!
 
Feb19-13, 08:06 PM   #6
 
From a photon's perspective, it is at rest, from ours, it is moving extremely fast. It's all about frame of reference, Einstein talks a lot about this stuff in his Special theory of Relativity.
 
Feb19-13, 08:14 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Menaus View Post
From a photon's perspective, it is at rest, from ours, it is moving extremely fast. It's all about frame of reference, Einstein talks a lot about this stuff in his Special theory of Relativity.
This is not correct. A photon cannot have a frame of reference per SR. Try transforming a frame moving at c to a frame not moving at c. You get nonsense as an answer. It doesn't work because all inertial frames will always measure light as moving at c in a vacuum. Light, per special relativity, is never at rest and cannot have an inertial frame.
 
Feb20-13, 03:14 AM   #8
 
Quote by Drakkith View Post
This is not correct. A photon cannot have a frame of reference per SR. Try transforming a frame moving at c to a frame not moving at c. You get nonsense as an answer. It doesn't work because all inertial frames will always measure light as moving at c in a vacuum. Light, per special relativity, is never at rest and cannot have an inertial frame.
You're right, sorry.
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Must photons have motion?
Thread Forum Replies
Are the photons we interact with actually anti photons? General Physics 7
Exciting electronic motion via polarized photons Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
The motion of photons. Special & General Relativity 2
is there a difference between photons from a light bulb and photons from the sun? Classical Physics 4
Are Virtual Photons Responsible For Real Photons? Quantum Physics 11