Understanding Biot-Savart Formula for a Wire on the x-axis

  • Thread starter DaConfusion
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Biot-savart
In summary, the conversation discusses the Biot Savart formula and how to determine the direction of the magnetic field at a given observation point. The participants mention using unit vectors and differential length vectors, as well as integrating over a circular loop. They also discuss the concept of current direction and the use of different coordinate systems. The main issue is determining the correct vector for current direction in order to get a positive contribution to the magnetic field.
  • #1
DaConfusion
36
0
Hey guys I have a wire oriented along the x-axis with lengths -L/2 to L/2

The first part of the Biot Savart formula has a I dl in vector notation crossed with (r-r')/(r-r')^3. I used I(i hat) for the I dl vector and to cross it, i used r as my observation point and r' as source. When I did the integral where the observation point D is located at D j(hat) i got a negative B oriented in the k (hat) axis. Now according to the answer and picture it should be positive.

Can you please give me tips on how to determine my I dl vector and maybe I flipped the r and r' and it should be source - observation point??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DaConfusion said:
Hey guys I have a wire oriented along the x-axis with lengths -L/2 to L/2

The first part of the Biot Savart formula has a I dl in vector notation crossed with (r-r')/(r-r')^3. I used I(i hat) for the I dl vector and to cross it, i used r as my observation point and r' as source. When I did the integral where the observation point D is located at D j(hat) i got a negative B oriented in the k (hat) axis. Now according to the answer and picture it should be positive.

Can you please give me tips on how to determine my I dl vector and maybe I flipped the r and r' and it should be source - observation point??
If the page is the x-y plane, all the dL x (r-r') in the problem are out of the page (positive z axis). Maybe you need to write the unit vector as (r - r')/|D - r'|. Could be you have a sign problem with D - r'.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The Biot Savart formula takes [itex]\vec{dl}\times\hat{r}[/itex], where [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] is the unit vector specifying the direction of the observation point with respect to the source (this should be parallel to your (r - r')). So I don't see how you got [itex]\hat{i}\times\hat{j} = -\hat{k}[/itex]. My guess is that you did interchange r and r'.

Edit: Looks like OlderDan beat me to it.
 
  • #4
The differential magnetic field is:
[tex]
d \vec B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi} \left( \frac{d\vec l' \times \hat R}{R^2} \right)
[/tex]

So I believe you are saying that, you have a wire oriented along the [itex] x [/itex] axis. Where the orgin is in the middle of the wire.

So you need to resolve the following:
[tex] d\vec l' [/tex]
[tex] \hat R [/tex]
[tex] R^2 [/tex]Note that [itex] d\vec l' [/itex] is the differential length of the wire pointed in the direction of the current. You know the length of this differential length because you have it on the [itex] x [/itex] axis. Thus you can say that the length is [itex] dx [/itex]. Now which direction is this vector supposed to point? This is the direction of the current, is it positive ([itex] +x [/itex]), or negative ([itex]-x[/itex]).

[itex] \hat R [/itex] is a unit vector that points from the differential line element ([itex] d\vec l' [/itex]) to the field point (your point of interest). Remember that a vector pointing from one point to another is:
[tex] \vec V_{AB} = \vec V_B - \vec V_A [/tex]

So if you want vector pointing from the source point [itex] d\vec l' [/itex] to the point of interest (say P - pointed to by a vector with the un-primed notation ([itex] \vec R [/itex])

You want a vector that points from the source point (where the charges are located - this is the PRIMED notation), to a point of interest (the UNPRIMED notation). So that would be unprime _vector minus primed_vector.

EDIT: I guess two people beat me to it :)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
biotsavart.JPG


Ok using that information, I am now attempting a problem where a wire forms a circular loop. I have drawn it roughly on paint brush.

I still get 0. My observation/field point is supposed to be located at the origin which makes the source vector negative. I don't understand what I am doing wrong
 
  • #6
Forget the details of the integration for a moment. What must the direction of the magnetic field be at the center of that current loop?
 
  • #7
it has to be pointing in the positive X direction
 
  • #8
Right. So check that each element of whatever you are integrating is giving a contribution in the +x direction.
 
  • #9
Ok i think the problem is located at where I am defining my dl. I said cos()k+sin()j . That must mean the current is traversing in a clockwise direction?

Which means I would have to make both negative? I do not understand how to define a direction for current when it is traveling in a circle. I understand what your saying, to make the numerator's cross product yeild a positive value in the i direction. But I don't understand the concept of defining a vector dl for a circle.

I re did the first line charge problem and it is now coming out positive and correct. So thanks for the help so far!
 
  • #10
ok I am getting 0, the vector I wrote for the current is wrong. I need help writing that please. I made the vector negative to yeild a postive i direction but the integral of cos is sin. Then 0 to 2 pi is 0.
 
  • #11
What vector would be tangent to the loop at any point?

EDIT: Remember [itex] d\vec l' [/itex] is a vector with a differential magnitude. What is [itex] d \vec l [/itex] in cylindrical coordinates?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Oh i was trying o keep dl in cartesian because my cylidrical/spherical is really weak. Ummm dl in cylindrical should be r i + (theta) j + z k and in this case z would be 0 so only a r and a theta?

oh and a tangent vector... not sure in this case. All I can think of is velocity which has to do with current so the current vector should be tangent?
 
  • #13
You can keep it in cartesian, it just makes the problem harder. What are i, j, k in cylindrical coordinates?

Would you prefer to do this problem in cartesian?
 
  • #14
No I have to learn cylindrical so I can be more proficient. So let's keep it in cylindrical. I thought cylindrical in i j k form would be

r i + theta j + z k
 
  • #15
Just a little review here.

Remember that a vector consists of a magnitude and direction. So when we talk about a vector like, [itex] \hat i [/itex] we are really saying that the vector is [itex] (1) \vec x [/itex], where [itex] (1) [/itex] is the magnitude and [itex] \vec x [/itex] is the direction. The reason I bring this up, is when we are writing [itex] d \ vec l [/itex] in the Biot-Savart law we are are asking for a tiny piece of the current with a differential magnitude, and then also a direction.

So in general in cartesian, [tex] d \vec l = \hat x dx + \hat y dy + \hat z dz [/tex].

In cylindrical, [tex] d \vec l = \hat r dr + \hat \phi r d\phi + \hat z dz [/tex]

What does [itex] \hat i [/itex] mean in cylindrical coordinates? It is pointing in the direction of the x-axis right? Well this doesn't mean much to us in cylindrical coordinates (we aren't taking advantage of the coordinate system). For example if we wanted to move in a direction of a circle we would only need to follow the direction of [itex] \phi [/itex].

Remember that i, j, k are all orthogonal to each other. r, phi, z in cylindrical are also orthogonal.

EDIT: So if you want to use [itex] \hat i [/itex] in cylindrical coordinates, you would need to express them as unit vectors of r, phi, z
 
Last edited:
  • #16
[tex] d \vec l = r d\phi \hat k + dr \hat j [/tex]


Edited, I updated according to the axis the circle loop is located. Sorry for being so slow, but you are helping a lot!
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Oh wait a second, would my K hat vector in the dl above be negative to indicate the current is traveling counter clockwise?
 
  • #18
dl is supposed to point in the direction of the current.

Actually if you want to use cylindrical coordinates, a vector pointing in the direction of phi is tangent to the circle. So as you increment in the phi direction you trace the circle (the direction of the current).

Does that make sense?

So if you use [tex] d \vec l = \hat \phi r d\phi [/tex] you are tracing the circle in the direction of the current.

What book are you using?
 
  • #19
Physics for Scientists and Engineers 3ed FISHBANE GASIORWICZ THORNTON
 
  • #20
Ok i see what you mean about the direction of current and phi.

As for my source point vector, it has a magnitude of lower case r and I will choose the direction to be right on the y-axis so r j hat

Plugging that in gives me this numerator:

dr j (hat) + r d(phi) k (hat) X -r j(hat)

and then that gives me r dr in the i hat direction, positive.

Then i get stuck with an integral that is dr/r^2 integrating from 0 to R and once again, I get negative!

I am sorry I keep getting mixed up.
 
  • #21
DaConfusion said:
Ok i see what you mean about the direction of current and phi.

As for my source point vector, it has a magnitude of lower case r and I will choose the direction to be right on the y-axis so r j hat

Plugging that in gives me this numerator:

dr j (hat) + r d(phi) k (hat) X -r j(hat)

and then that gives me r dr in the i hat direction, positive.

Then i get stuck with an integral that is dr/r^2 integrating from 0 to R and once again, I get negative!

I am sorry I keep getting mixed up.

Yeah, you are still getting mixed up with the differential elements. Let me set you up a bit and you can finish off the problem.

Lets imagine a cartesian coordinate system with a circle on the X-Y plane. The circle has a radius [itex] b [/itex]. We want to find the magnetic flux density at the orgin (call it point [itex]P[/itex]). Let's let [itex] P [/itex] have a [itex] z [/itex] value, we'll keep it positive. Thus, [itex] P(0,0,z) [/itex]

Notice how point [itex] P [/itex] has any [itex] z [/itex] value. Why didn't we say it is [itex] z' [/itex]? We use the UN-PRIMED notation because it is the field point (our point of interest).

So let's recite the Biot-Savart law, and solve:
[tex] \vec B = \int_{C'} d\vec B [/tex]
[tex] d\vec B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \left( \frac{d \vec \ell \,' \times \hat R}{R^2} \right) [/tex]
(or)
[tex] d\vec B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \left( \frac{d \vec \ell \,' \times \vec R}{R^3} \right) [/tex]

We will use the latter [itex] d\vec B [/itex] expression.

[tex] d \vec \ell \,' = \hat \phi b d\phi' [/tex]
[tex] \vec R = \hat z z - \hat r b [/tex]

[tex] R = \sqrt{z^2+b^2}[/tex]

Can you finish it off?
 
Last edited:
  • #22
yes I can get it from there, thank you so much for your help.
 
  • #23
No problem at all. I really wasn't doing too much since that is basically straight from my book.

We are using Field and Wave Electromagnetics, by David K. Cheng.

They might have this in your technical library. I've been reading through https://www.amazon.com/dp/013805326X/?tag=pfamazon01-20a little bit as a different book for the course, and I have to say... I really wish the professor chose that book instead. It's really nice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the Biot-Savart formula?

The Biot-Savart formula is a mathematical equation used to calculate the magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire. It was discovered by French physicists Jean-Baptiste Biot and Félix Savart in the early 19th century.

2. How does the Biot-Savart formula work?

The formula uses the principles of vector calculus to calculate the magnetic field at a specific point, based on the magnitude and direction of the current in the wire and the distance from the wire to the point. It takes into account the direction of the current, the permeability of free space, and the distance from the wire.

3. What is the significance of the Biot-Savart formula?

The Biot-Savart formula is an important tool for understanding and predicting the behavior of magnetic fields in various situations. It is used in many areas of science and engineering, including electromagnetism, astrophysics, and fluid dynamics.

4. How is the Biot-Savart formula applied to a wire on the x-axis?

To apply the Biot-Savart formula to a wire on the x-axis, the formula is modified to take into account the specific orientation of the wire. The current direction and distance from the wire are represented by vectors, and the formula is integrated over the length of the wire to calculate the magnetic field at a point on the x-axis.

5. What are the limitations of the Biot-Savart formula?

The Biot-Savart formula is based on certain assumptions and simplifications, such as the wire being infinitely thin and straight, and the current being constant. These limitations may not accurately reflect real-world situations, and therefore the formula may not always give precise results. Additionally, it does not take into account quantum effects at the atomic level.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
673
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top