Potential Risks of the Large Hadron Collider

In summary, Two Russian Mathematicians believe that the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland has the potential to create tears in spacetime. They argue that the collisions at the LHC are more energetic than those that occur in our upper atmosphere, and therefore offer new opportunities for observation. However, some people are concerned about the possibility of creating a black hole that could destroy the Earth, but it has been suggested that any black holes created at the LHC would evaporate quickly. The paper discussing these claims has not been published in a mainstream journal, so it may not be eligible for discussion in certain forums.
  • #1
Pythagorean
Gold Member
4,401
313
Two Russian Mathematicians claim that the Large Hadron Collider (being built in Switzerland) has the potential to "tear holes" in spacetime.

Here is their paper written from the http://www.mi.ras.ru/index.php?l=1"

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.2696

Just curious on people's thoughts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Don't much more energetic collisions happen all the time in our upper atmosphere? So called "Oh-My-God" particles that travel at like 0.99c?
 
  • #3
Not sure if they're comparable to what the LHC will do, but we know at least that the LHC offers us something more than observing the collisions in the ionosphere or there would be no reason to build it.
 
  • #4
Well yeah, that's the whole point. But people are saying "What if they create a black hole and suck us all in!11" (not the guys you are talking about, just the general public). I am just asking if it is true or not that there are more energetic collisions in our atmosphere happening on a regular basis. That would put our fears to rest about that part.

Observing something like tears in the spacetime would be cool.
 
  • #5
Was it not anwered before that a black hole created this way would evaporate very quickly.
 
  • #7
Sorry Pathagorean but I should have explained. If a paper is published in an appropriate mainstream journal, then it may be referenced in a regular forum; if not, then, less special exceptions like Garret Lisi's paper, it is not elegible for discussion anywhere on PF.

If this paper doesn't get published then consider that your critique.

S&D is strictly for claims of and evidence for unexplained phenomena outside of the mainstream.
 
Last edited:

1. What are the potential risks associated with the Large Hadron Collider?

There are several potential risks associated with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), including the creation of microscopic black holes, the production of strangelets, and the activation of vacuum decay. However, these risks are highly unlikely and have been thoroughly studied and deemed safe by scientists.

2. Could the Large Hadron Collider cause a catastrophic event?

No, the Large Hadron Collider is not capable of causing a catastrophic event. The energy levels produced by the LHC are much lower than those found in natural cosmic rays, which have been bombarding Earth for billions of years without causing any harm.

3. Is the Large Hadron Collider a threat to the Earth?

No, the Large Hadron Collider is not a threat to the Earth. As mentioned before, the energy levels produced by the LHC are much lower than those found in natural cosmic rays. Additionally, the LHC is equipped with numerous safety measures and emergency shutdown systems to prevent any potential risks.

4. Are there any potential risks to humans working at or near the Large Hadron Collider?

No, there are no known risks to humans working at or near the Large Hadron Collider. The LHC operates in a controlled environment and all necessary safety precautions are taken to ensure the well-being of workers.

5. Have there been any incidents or accidents at the Large Hadron Collider?

No, there have been no major incidents or accidents at the Large Hadron Collider since its construction. The LHC has been operational since 2008 and has been running smoothly with no safety issues reported.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top