Spread it over a large surface area?

In summary, the decay of radioactive waste cannot be sped up by spreading it over a larger surface area. The half-life of radioactive material refers to the bulk of the material, and spreading it into individual atoms does not change this. The environment does not affect the rate of decay. The best way to manage reactor waste is through methods such as irradiation with neutrons or burning it in a subcritical reactor.
  • #1
Blenton
210
0
I assume there is something wrong with my thinking, but couldn't you be able to speed up the decay of radioactive waste by spreading it over a large surface area so that it could disperse its energy much better? I understand half life refers to the majority bulk of a material, but if you were to spread the material into individual atoms, what happens then?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The atoms decay when they decay. The environment they are in makes no difference.
 
  • #3
Then individual uranium atoms are safe for about 4.7 billion years?
 
  • #4
Blenton said:
Then individual uranium atoms are safe for about 4.7 billion years?

On average, yes :smile:
 
  • #5
All radioactive atoms (nuclei of atoms) remain radioactive and potentially harmful for a few or many half-lives until they decay. Sometimes they decay into other radioactive atoms. They normally emit alphas, betas (electrons or positrons), or gamm rays. I have read that some low-Z electron-capture decay half lives can be changed by maybe 0.1% by packing them in dense crystals. The best way to treat reactor wastes (other than Yucca Mountain) is to irradiate them with neutrons or "burn" them up in a subcritical reactor that is assisted by a proton accelerator. See
http://www.wipp.energy.gov/science/adtf/ATW.pdf
 
  • #6
Bob S said:
All radioactive atoms (nuclei of atoms) remain radioactive and potentially harmful for a few or many half-lives until they decay. Sometimes they decay into other radioactive atoms. They normally emit alphas, betas (electrons or positrons), or gamm rays. I have read that some low-Z electron-capture decay half lives can be changed by maybe 0.1% by packing them in dense crystals. The best way to treat reactor wastes (other than Yucca Mountain) is to irradiate them with neutrons or "burn" them up in a subcritical reactor that is assisted by a proton accelerator. See
http://www.wipp.energy.gov/science/adtf/ATW.pdf

Well that's very interesting, but the answer to the OP is as stated above: No, it does not matter if you "spread it out over a larger surface area."
 

1. What does it mean to "spread it over a large surface area?"

Spreading something over a large surface area refers to distributing it evenly across a wide space. This can be done physically by physically moving and dispersing a substance, or conceptually by dividing it into smaller parts and distributing them across a larger area.

2. Why is it important to spread things over a large surface area?

Spreading things over a large surface area allows for better distribution and coverage. This can be particularly important in scientific experiments or processes, as it ensures that substances or concepts are evenly distributed and have a greater chance of being effective.

3. What are some examples of spreading things over a large surface area in a scientific context?

Some examples of spreading things over a large surface area in science include using a spreader to evenly distribute bacteria on an agar plate, using a vortex to mix and spread a substance in a test tube, or using a spectrometer to spread light over a wide range of wavelengths for analysis.

4. Can spreading things over a large surface area have any negative effects?

In some cases, spreading things over a large surface area can lead to a decrease in concentration or potency. This can be a concern in certain experiments or processes where a higher concentration is necessary for desired results. Additionally, spreading things over a large surface area may also increase the risk of contamination.

5. Are there any techniques or tools specifically designed for spreading things over a large surface area?

Yes, there are various tools and techniques that are designed for spreading things over a large surface area in different scientific contexts. These include pipettes, spreaders, vortex mixers, spectrometers, and more. Scientists may also develop their own methods for spreading things over a large surface area depending on their specific needs and experiments.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
984
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top