Electron in constant magnetic field - classical vs quantum

In summary, the conversation discusses the issue of reconciling the classical and quantum mechanical views of the movement of an electron in a constant magnetic field. The classical view suggests circular orbits, while the quantum mechanical view shows a non-circular wave function. This is due to the fact that quantum mechanical eigenfunctions do not always possess the symmetries of classical states. However, coherent states can be constructed to resemble classical motion as closely as possible.
  • #1
grelade
5
0
Hi,

Movement of an electron in constant magnetic field, according to semiclassical QM, give rise to Landau levels - a quantization of energy. Everything would be fine but i find it difficult to reconcile these findings with classical point of view in which Lorentz force is acting on moving electron.
So, classically an electron will be moving in circular orbits according to condition:
[tex]m v^2 / r = evB[/tex]
We get continuous spectrum of circular orbits each with different energy E.

However when we're considering the same situation in QM (B field in z direction) we get a wave function of the electron like this (according to wikipedia and my own calculations):
[tex]\Psi (x,y) = e^{-i k_x x} H_n(\frac{y-x_0^2 k_x}{x_0}) e^{-(\frac{y-x_0^2 k_x}{\sqrt{2} x_0})^2}
[/tex]
,where [tex]x_0=\sqrt{\hbar/eB}[/tex].

This solution is manifestly not circular-symmetric. Which it should be according to classical point of view. So plotting [tex]|\Psi|^2[/tex] don't seems to me like having any resemblance to classical motion at all and i don't have any idea why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, in general, the quantum mechanical eigenfunctions do not correspond to classical orbits. These eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian form a basis of the Hilbert space -- which is one reason why we work with them -- but when we take the classical limit we usually do not find that these eigenfunctions turn into classical states. One reason you pointed out -- more or less. The eigenfunctions do not always posses the symmetries of the classical action (in this case these wavefunctions break rotational symmetry). In this case the origin of this "missing" symmetry is the fact that one has to make a choice of gauge in order to solve for the eigenfunctions. Choosing a gauge will in general break one or more symmetries (you can work in the symmetric gauge which is rotationally symmetric, but then you will lose translational symmetry).

We can, however, construct an wavefunction which is "as classical as possible". These wavefunctions are called coherent states. These states localize the particle as much as possible in both coordinate and momentum space. They are constructed as some linear combination of all the eigenstates. If you want to know what these coherent states exactly look like in the QHE you should look up the notes by S.M Girvin.

One thing I should add is that these eigenfunctions in some sense correspond to a whole collection of classical orbits with a radius of roughly the magnetic length.
 

1. What is the classical interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field?

The classical interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field is that the electron will experience a force due to the interaction between its magnetic dipole moment and the external magnetic field. This force causes the electron to undergo circular motion around the field lines of the magnetic field.

2. How does the quantum interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field differ from the classical interpretation?

The quantum interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field takes into account the wave-like nature of the electron. Instead of following a specific path, the electron exists in a superposition of all possible paths and its motion is described by a wave function. The electron's energy levels are quantized and it can only exist in certain energy states, leading to discrete energy levels and orbits.

3. Can the classical and quantum interpretations of an electron in a constant magnetic field be reconciled?

Yes, the classical and quantum interpretations can be reconciled through the correspondence principle, which states that the predictions of classical mechanics should match the predictions of quantum mechanics in the limit of large quantum numbers. In other words, the classical interpretation is a good approximation for macroscopic systems, while the quantum interpretation is necessary for understanding the behavior of microscopic systems.

4. How is the classical motion of an electron in a constant magnetic field described mathematically?

The classical motion of an electron in a constant magnetic field can be described by the Lorentz force equation, which states that the force on a charged particle moving in a magnetic field is equal to the product of the charge, velocity, and magnetic field strength. This equation can be used to calculate the trajectory of the electron and its radius of curvature.

5. What are the implications of the quantum interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field?

The quantum interpretation of an electron in a constant magnetic field has several implications. It explains the quantization of energy levels and orbits, as well as the phenomenon of electron spin. It also allows for the understanding of quantum effects such as tunneling and interference, which are not accounted for in the classical interpretation.

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
741
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
746
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
766
Back
Top