New Reply

Irreducible representation of tensor field

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan17-13, 10:43 AM   #1
 

Irreducible representation of tensor field


In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

[itex] B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) [/itex] Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> As chaos celebrates its 50th birthday, biophysicist develops a new method to visualize it
>> Novel features of helium-3 superfluidity discovered with new SQUID detector chip
>> Physics of 'green waves' could make city traffic flow more smoothly
Jan17-13, 12:05 PM   #2
 
Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
If you're talking about the general linear group GL(n), the irreducible representations are the tensors whose indices have been symmetrized in a particular way. When you go to the orthogonal group, there are fewer transformations in the group, and some of these representations are no longer irreducible. The operation of contraction (forming a trace) commutes with the orthogonal transformations.
Jan17-13, 02:59 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by su-ki View Post
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

[itex] B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) [/itex] Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.

This is true only if the symmetric part is traceless. In general, for any rank-2 tensor, we write
[tex]B^{ ab } = B^{ (ab) } + B^{ [ab] } .[/tex]
Then we take the symmetric part and decompose it as
[tex]
B^{ (ab) } = \left( B^{ (ab) } - \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B \right) + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B .
[/tex]
The tensor (call it [itex]S^{ ab }[/itex]) in the bracket on the left-hand side is symmetric and traceless, because
[tex]B = \mbox{ Tr } ( B^{ (ab) } ) = g_{ ab } B^{ (ab) }[/tex]
So, our original tensor can now be written as
[tex]
B^{ ab } = A^{ ab } + S^{ ab } + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B ,
[/tex]
where [itex]A^{ ab } = - A^{ ba } \equiv B^{ [ab] }[/itex]

See posts #24 and 25 in

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...=192572&page=2

Sam
Jan17-13, 03:03 PM   #4
 

Irreducible representation of tensor field


yea, i got just it, thank u :)
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Irreducible representation of tensor field
Thread Forum Replies
Basis for an irreducible representation Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
irreducible representation of so(3) Linear & Abstract Algebra 0
irreducible representation of S3 Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
a question on irreducible representation Linear & Abstract Algebra 3
irreducible representation of C3v Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 6