How Large Can a Planet be and Still Have Earth's Mass?

In summary: A rock at 800 MPa would have a density of 5.5 kg/m3. This means that a rock-sized planet would only be 2.8 Earth diameters in size.
  • #1
Yae Miteo
41
0
Question: Just as in the title. How large can a planet be and still have the Earth's mass? Obviously, this depends on its composition, just as long as it's solid and life can exist on it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends on the density. Lower density means a bigger planet and vice versa.
 
  • #3
Yae Miteo said:
Question: Just as in the title. How large can a planet be and still have the Earth's mass? Obviously, this depends on its composition, just as long as it's solid and life can exist on it.

Your question is very vague. Define "solid". What "life" do you have in mind?
 
  • #4
If a planet were composed entirely of ice [highly improbable], it would be less than 2 Earth diameters in size.
 
  • #5
Chronos said:
If a planet were composed entirely of ice [highly improbable], it would be less than 2 Earth diameters in size.

I would call that a 'comet.'
 
  • #6
Okay, basically, "How large can a planet be and still be suitable for humans, i.e. not have an excessive gravitational pull. (no more than say, 10% greater than earth's)"
 
  • #7
Newton's Law of Gravitation:
F = G*M1*M2/r^2
The surface acceleration of a planet (M2) is:
g = G*m2/r^2
but m2 = (4/3)*pi*r^3*d where d is the average density of the planet
so g = (4/3)*G*pi*r*d

Choose your favorite g and d and solve for r.
 
  • #8
tadchem said:
Newton's Law of Gravitation:
F = G*M1*M2/r^2
The surface acceleration of a planet (M2) is:
g = G*m2/r^2
but m2 = (4/3)*pi*r^3*d where d is the average density of the planet
so g = (4/3)*G*pi*r*d

Choose your favorite g and d and solve for r.

You cannot. d is NOT independent on g, nor r.

And no one knows the density of Earth!
Sure, the compressed one is known to three figures from Cavendish experiment. But the uncompressed one...

http://books.google.ee/books?id=b6BRNJEkq2EC&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=Earth+"uncompressed+density

confidently claims 4,0

http://books.google.ee/books?id=NMFLKD48d0AC&pg=PA10&lpg=PA10&dq="uncompressed+density"+Earth

as confidently claims range 4,4 to 4,5

Thus, the compressibility of Earth is unknown by half - which should mean 25 % uncertainty in sound speed. Well, earthquake waves should be better measured.

You thus have no means of estimating the compressed density of a planet bigger than Earth. Even if Earth compressibility were known, you would have no idea what the compressibility does at pressures slightly higher than those present and observed inside Earth.
 
  • #9
I fail to see how this is relevant, snorkack.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #10
Chronos said:
I fail to see how this is relevant, snorkack.

Highly relevant.
The question:
how big can an Earth mass solid planet be?
reduces to the question
how low density can Earth mass solid planet have?
And that depends on the compressibility of stone at high pressures.
 
  • #11
snorkack said:
Highly relevant.
The question:
how big can an Earth mass solid planet be?
reduces to the question
how low density can Earth mass solid planet have?
And that depends on the compressibility of stone at high pressures.

I'm not as familiar as others are with the above math, but wouldn't you have much less compression of material in a decreased density planet?
 
  • #12
Does a hypothetical planet HAVE to be stone?
Low density solids include H2O (917 kg/m3) - NH3 (817 kg/m3) - CH4 (423 kg/m3) - methane clathrate (900 kg/m3) - ammonium hydroxide (880 kg/m3) - all of which can be abundant enough in planetary space to form an earth-mass planet. These can be taken as an estimate to the lower limit of the density of a hypothetical solid planet.
These densities ignore compressibility (currently not known for most materials at the pressures developed inside an earth-sized planet). Compression will not change the mass of the planet, only its overall density, reducing the diameter.
Under extreme pressures, ice has a density of about 1300 kg/m3 (Ice XII, 800 MPa). A spherical body with this average density would have a radius 12.3% smaller than a spherical body of the same mass and the density of regular ice.
Rock is even less compressible than water or ice.
 

1. How do we determine a planet's mass?

The mass of a planet can be determined by measuring its gravitational pull on objects around it, or by observing its orbit around a larger object.

2. What is Earth's mass?

Earth's mass is approximately 5.97 x 10^24 kilograms.

3. Can a planet be larger than Earth and still have the same mass?

Yes, a planet can be larger than Earth and still have the same mass. This is because a planet's mass is determined by its density, not just its size.

4. What is the maximum possible size for a planet with Earth's mass?

The maximum possible size for a planet with Earth's mass would depend on its density. However, based on current scientific knowledge, it is estimated that a planet with Earth's mass could be up to 2-3 times larger in diameter than Earth.

5. Are there any known planets that fit this criteria?

Yes, there are several known exoplanets that have similar mass and size to Earth. However, their composition and density may differ, making them unique from Earth.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
666
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
985
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top