Difference in quasi elastic scattering and non elastic scattering

In summary, quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS) is an approximation where the frequency shift is much smaller than the frequency. It is used to determine the velocity distribution of scatterers and has been particularly useful in studying soft matter phases. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a type of QELS that measures the angular dependence of scattered light to determine different velocities. Despite the frequency shift, QELS is still considered elastic scattering because it is due to particle movement rather than intrinsic processes.
  • #1
watertreader
23
0
hi,

How do we differentiate between quasi elastic scattering and non elastic scattering?

Was told that dynamic light scattering falls under the quasi elastic scattering... but it seems to me that light undergoing such scattering have its frequency shifted... this seems to me to be that energy is being lost...shouldn't it be classified as non elastic scattering?

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS) is simply the approximation that the frequency shift is much smaller than the frequency. Conceptually, it arises from particles that are moving rather than intrinsic processes (for example, Raman scattering).

The information gained is the velocity distribution of scatterers. This is why DLS has been so useful as a probe of soft matter (hard sphere colloids, for example) phases. The angular dependence of the scattered light is related to the velocity distribution, so by moving the detector, different velocities are measured. Forward scattered light corresponds to v = minimum, while backscattered light corresponds to maximal velocities.
 
  • #3
for your question. Quasi elastic scattering and non elastic scattering are two types of scattering phenomena that occur when light interacts with matter. The main difference between these two types of scattering lies in the energy transfer between the light and the particles it scatters off of.

Quasi elastic scattering, also known as Rayleigh scattering, occurs when the energy of the scattered light remains the same as the incident light. This means that there is no energy transfer between the light and the particles it scatters off of. Dynamic light scattering, also known as photon correlation spectroscopy, is a type of quasi elastic scattering where the motion of particles in a solution can be measured by analyzing the fluctuations in the scattered light. This type of scattering is often used to study the size and movement of particles in a solution.

On the other hand, non elastic scattering, also known as Raman scattering, occurs when the energy of the scattered light is changed due to interactions with the particles. This means that there is energy transfer between the light and the particles, resulting in a shift in the frequency of the scattered light. This type of scattering is often used to identify the chemical composition of a sample as different molecules will have unique Raman spectra.

In regards to your question about dynamic light scattering being classified as quasi elastic scattering, this is because although the scattered light may have fluctuations in intensity, the energy of the light itself remains unchanged. The frequency shift that you observed is due to the Brownian motion of particles in the solution, which causes slight changes in the path length of the scattered light, resulting in a Doppler shift in frequency. This does not indicate a loss of energy, but rather a change in the path of the light due to the movement of particles.

I hope this helps clarify the difference between quasi elastic and non elastic scattering. Both types of scattering are important tools in the study of matter and can provide valuable information about the properties and behavior of particles in a sample.
 

1. What is the main difference between quasi elastic scattering and non elastic scattering?

The main difference between quasi elastic scattering and non elastic scattering lies in the final state of the particles involved. In quasi elastic scattering, the particles involved maintain their original identities and only transfer energy during the interaction. In contrast, non elastic scattering involves a change in the identities of the particles, either through the creation of new particles or the destruction of existing ones.

2. How does the energy transfer differ in quasi elastic and non elastic scattering?

In quasi elastic scattering, the energy transfer is limited to a small range of values, and the particles involved retain most of their initial kinetic energy. In non elastic scattering, however, the energy transfer can be much greater, resulting in a significant change in the kinetic energy of the particles.

3. Can you provide an example of a process that exhibits quasi elastic scattering?

A common example of quasi elastic scattering is Compton scattering, where a photon interacts with an electron. The electron gains some energy from the photon, but both particles remain intact and continue moving after the interaction.

4. How is the scattering angle affected in quasi elastic and non elastic scattering?

In quasi elastic scattering, the scattering angle is typically small, with the particles involved maintaining a similar trajectory as before the interaction. In non elastic scattering, the scattering angle can be much larger, as the particles undergo a significant change in direction due to the energy transfer.

5. What are the implications of quasi elastic and non elastic scattering in different fields of science?

Quasi elastic scattering is commonly used in fields such as nuclear physics and material science to study the properties of particles and materials. Non elastic scattering, on the other hand, is important in fields such as particle physics and astrophysics, where interactions between particles can result in the creation of new particles or the detection of non-visible matter.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top