Mass parameter for quintessence

In summary, the conversation revolved around the topic of quintessence and whether it is a real concept or not. The value of the mass parameter M was also discussed, with one article by Steinhardt providing a possible formula but not specifying the units. The conversation also touched on the current relevance of quintessence in the scientific community and whether it is still being considered as a valid concept.
  • #1
shadi_s10
89
0
Dear all,

As u know, one of the best potentials for quintessence is
V=[M]^[4+[itex]\alpha[/itex]] [[itex]\phi[/itex]]^[-[itex]\alpha[/itex]]

They usually call M, THE MASS PARAMETER.

Who knows what is the value of M for now?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have never heard any evidence that "quintessence" is real. Have you?

If it is not a real thing, then there would be no correct value of the parameter M.

My impression is that quintessence is an idea that people used to talk about back around 2003---over 5 years ago anyway. And it turned out to be an unnecessary complication. So it went out of style.

So the professional cosmologists don't talk about quintessence very much, except to rule it out or show it is unnecessary to the model when they get some new data.
(Every time you get a new batch of data, it is one of the things you consider, and check to see that it still is unnecessary.)

Have you seen some recent scientific journal articles about it? Have I missed something?
 
  • #3
marcus said:
I have never heard any evidence that "quintessence" is real. Have you?

If it is not a real thing, then there would be no correct value of the parameter M.

My impression is that quintessence is an idea that people used to talk about back around 2003---over 5 years ago anyway. And it turned out to be an unnecessary complication. So it went out of style.

So the professional cosmologists don't talk about quintessence very much, except to rule it out or show it is unnecessary to the model when they get some new data.
(Every time you get a new batch of data, it is one of the things you consider, and check to see that it still is unnecessary.)

Have you seen some recent scientific journal articles about it? Have I missed something?

Dear Marcus,
I agree with you and I am trying to rule it out and show this is completely unneccessary.
But for doing that I really need to find out what is the value for the parameter mass they are using...
unfortunately I could just find one article about it -steinhardt- which says
M=([[itex]\rho[/itex]][m] * [planck mass][[itex]\alpha[/itex]])^(1/(4+[itex]\alpha[/itex]))

But I don't know which units are they working in...
 
  • #4
Dear Shadi, I probably won't be able to help but others might. The first thing is to post the name of the Steinhardt article, if possible a link. Then we can see what you are talking about in context.

Oh! I think you may mean this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9807002
Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant
Ivaylo Zlatev (1), Limin Wang (1), Paul J. Steinhardt (1 and 2) ((1) University of Pennsylvania, (2) Princeton University)
(Submitted on 1 Jul 1998 (v1), last revised 21 Oct 1998 (this version, v2))
Recent observations suggest that a large fraction of the energy density of the universe has negative pressure. One explanation is vacuum energy density; another is quintessence in the form of a scalar field slowly evolving down a potential. In either case, a key problem is to explain why the energy density nearly coincides with the matter density today. The densities decrease at different rates as the universe expands, so coincidence today appears to require that their ratio be set to a specific, infinitessimal value in the early universe. In this paper, we introduce the notion of a "tracker field", a form of quintessence, and show how it may explain the coincidence, adding new motivation for the quintessence scenario.
4 pages, 4 figures

Is that the paper? My guess is that it is dead letter. Over 10 years old. But someone else here may know better. If this is it, then at least they have something to look at.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
marcus said:
Dear Shadi, I probably won't be able to help but others might. The first thing is to post the name of the Steinhardt article, if possible a link. Then we can see what you are talking about in context.

Oh! I think you may mean this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9807002
Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant
Ivaylo Zlatev (1), Limin Wang (1), Paul J. Steinhardt (1 and 2) ((1) University of Pennsylvania, (2) Princeton University)
(Submitted on 1 Jul 1998 (v1), last revised 21 Oct 1998 (this version, v2))
Recent observations suggest that a large fraction of the energy density of the universe has negative pressure. One explanation is vacuum energy density; another is quintessence in the form of a scalar field slowly evolving down a potential. In either case, a key problem is to explain why the energy density nearly coincides with the matter density today. The densities decrease at different rates as the universe expands, so coincidence today appears to require that their ratio be set to a specific, infinitessimal value in the early universe. In this paper, we introduce the notion of a "tracker field", a form of quintessence, and show how it may explain the coincidence, adding new motivation for the quintessence scenario.
4 pages, 4 figures

Thanks my friend
this is exactly the paper I meant
 

1. What is the mass parameter for quintessence?

The mass parameter for quintessence is a fundamental constant that characterizes the strength of the interaction between quintessence particles and other particles in the universe. It is denoted by the symbol m and has units of mass.

2. How does the mass parameter affect the behavior of quintessence?

The mass parameter determines the range and strength of the quintessence force. A larger mass parameter results in a shorter range and a stronger force, while a smaller mass parameter leads to a longer range and a weaker force.

3. Is the mass parameter constant or does it vary over time?

The mass parameter for quintessence is typically assumed to be constant, but some theories suggest that it may vary over time. This would have significant implications for the behavior of quintessence and its impact on the expansion of the universe.

4. How is the mass parameter related to dark energy?

Quintessence is a type of dark energy, and the mass parameter plays a crucial role in determining its properties and behavior. It is one of the key parameters in equations describing the evolution of dark energy and its effect on the expansion of the universe.

5. Can the mass parameter for quintessence be measured?

Currently, there is no direct way to measure the mass parameter for quintessence. It is typically determined by fitting theoretical models to observational data from astronomical surveys and experiments. However, ongoing research may lead to new methods for measuring this fundamental constant in the future.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
158
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
875
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
830
Back
Top