Regarding functions how can simplifying a function change it's domain

In summary, when simplifying an expression, it is important to take into account any restrictions on the domain that may arise from the manipulation. In this case, the simplified form of the function f(x) is x-1, but it is only equivalent to f(x) for all values of x except x=-1, where the division by zero causes a hole in the function. It is important to be aware of common traps such as division by zero and irrational numbers when performing calculations.
  • #1
Marmoteer
8
0
for example
if [itex]f(x) = \frac{x^{2} - 1}{x+1}[/itex]

they by factoring:

[itex]f(x) = \frac{x^{2} - 1}{x+1}
= \frac{(x + 1)(x - 1)}{x+1}
= x - 1 [/itex]

thus the simplified version is [itex]x - 1[/itex]

let's say [itex]g(x) =[/itex] simplified [itex] f(x)[/itex]

[itex]g(x) = x - 1 [/itex]

meaning [itex]g(x) = f(x)[/itex]

but

[itex]g(-1) ≠ f(-1)[/itex]

am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
##f(x) = \frac {x^2-1}{x+1}##
##f(0) = \frac {0^2-1}{0+1}##
##f(0) = -1##

##g(x) = x-1##
##g(0) = 0-1##
##g(0) =-1##
The two functions act the same except at x = -1 at which ##f(x)## has a hole at -1.
 
  • #3
Oops Sorry I meant to write [itex]g(-1) ≠ f(-1) [/itex]
 
  • #4
how can simplifying a function change it's domain

Symbolic manipulations in math are an abbreviation for thought, not a substitute for it. If you "simplify" an expression without thinking about it, you can make a faulty deduction. The correct deduction is

[itex] \frac{(x+1) (x-1)}{x+1} = x-1 [/itex] except when [itex] x = -1 [/itex].

There may be types of math where you only manipulate symbols and never use ordinary language, but algebra is not one of them.
 
  • #5
Marmoteer said:
for example
if [itex]f(x) = \frac{x^{2} - 1}{x+1}[/itex]

they by factoring:

[itex]f(x) = \frac{x^{2} - 1}{x+1}
= \frac{(x + 1)(x - 1)}{x+1}
= x - 1 [/itex]

thus the simplified version is [itex]x - 1[/itex]

let's say [itex]g(x) =[/itex] simplified [itex] f(x)[/itex]

[itex]g(x) = x - 1 [/itex]

meaning [itex]g(x) = f(x)[/itex]
What you are "missing" is that this is not true. What is true is that f(x)= g(x) for all x except x= -1. f and g are NOT the same function.

but

[itex]g(-1) ≠ f(-1)[/itex]

am I missing something?
 
  • #6
Stephen Tashi said:
Symbolic manipulations in math are an abbreviation for thought, not a substitute for it. If you "simplify" an expression without thinking about it, you can make a faulty deduction. The correct deduction is

[itex] \frac{(x+1) (x-1)}{x+1} = x-1 [/itex] except when [itex] x = -1 [/itex].

There may be types of math where you only manipulate symbols and never use ordinary language, but algebra is not one of them.

Is there an easy way to spot a problem like this, or is it something you just get better at over time?
 
  • #7
You should have learned long ago that you cannot divide by 0 so that the division in
[tex]\frac{(x- 1)(x+1)}{x+1}= x- 1[/tex]
is only valid when [itex]x+ 1\ne 0[/itex] which is only true when [itex]x\ne -1[/itex].
 
  • #8
mesa said:
Is there an easy way to spot a problem like this, or is it something you just get better at over time?

There are common traps, like expessions that "don't work" for some values of variables because they involve division by zero or square roots of negative numbers etc.

You'll get better at spotting the common traps over time if you become suspicious of any form of calculation. Don't trust. Don't believe.
 
  • #9
Stephen Tashi said:
There are common traps, like expessions that "don't work" for some values of variables because they involve division by zero or square roots of negative numbers etc.

You'll get better at spotting the common traps over time if you become suspicious of any form of calculation. Don't trust. Don't believe.

The dividing by zero makes a lot of sense, I was surprised to see it still apllied even when the numerator would also equal 0 hence 0/0. I will certainly be mindful of this and irrational numbers in the future, thanks for the tip!
 

1. How does simplifying a function affect its domain?

When simplifying a function, the domain may change due to the elimination of certain terms or operations. For example, if a function contains a square root, simplifying it may result in a smaller domain because the square root is only defined for non-negative numbers.

2. Can simplifying a function expand its domain?

It is possible for simplifying a function to expand its domain if it removes restrictions or limitations that were previously present. For instance, if a function contains a rational expression with a denominator that can be simplified to remove a common factor, the domain may expand to include values that were previously excluded.

3. Are there any limitations to simplifying a function's domain?

Yes, there are some limitations to simplifying a function's domain. Simplifying a function cannot create a domain that is undefined or does not make sense in the context of the function. For example, simplifying a function cannot create a domain that includes negative numbers for a function representing the height of a building.

4. How do I know if simplifying a function will change its domain?

You can determine if simplifying a function will change its domain by carefully examining the operations and terms present in the original function. Look for any restrictions or limitations that may be removed during the simplification process, such as square roots, rational expressions, or absolute values.

5. Why is it important to consider the domain when simplifying a function?

Considering the domain when simplifying a function is important because it ensures that the function remains valid and meaningful. The domain represents all possible input values for the function, and simplifying a function without considering the domain may result in a function that is undefined or does not accurately represent the original relationship.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
885
Replies
4
Views
386
Replies
3
Views
682
Replies
7
Views
820
Replies
2
Views
672
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
837
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
714
  • General Math
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top