Proton e goes to zero, smaller g, , vacuum color polarization.

In summary, the strength of the color force determines the polarization of the vacuum by virtual quarks and virtual gluons. As the strength of the color force is reduced, the reduction in vacuum polarization is proportional between virtual quark and virtual gluon polarizations. If there are 17 or more quark flavors, there is no confinement, but if there are fewer flavors, confinement may still appear at very low energies. The minimum mass of the seventh quark flavor is currently unknown.
  • #1
Spinnor
Gold Member
2,214
424
Suppose we consider a proton where we set the electric charge of the three quarks towards zero. At this point I assume we still would have the three quarks bound together?

Now reduce the strength of the strong force by say ten times. I was told in posts that the radius of the proton depends on the strong coupling constant like,

r ≈ exp(c/g) or r ≈ exp(c/g^2)

Can we assume the mass of the proton is dependent on the strength of the strong force?

Quarks polarize the vacuum by two countering effects, virtual quark and virtual gluon production?

As the strength of the color force is reduced is the reduction in the polarization of the vacuum proportional between virtual quark and virtual gluon polarizations? Is there some type of scale invariance here, do they both go to zero at the same rate?

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Spinnor said:
Suppose we consider a proton where we set the electric charge of the three quarks towards zero. At this point I assume we still would have the three quarks bound together?

Yes.

Spinnor said:
Can we assume the mass of the proton is dependent on the strength of the strong force?

Yes; the mass of the proton is of order hbar*c/r where r is the proton radius [at least if you can neglect the rest masses of the quarks themselves; that is, if they each have masses much less than hbar*c/r, which they do in the real world].

Spinnor said:
Quarks polarize the vacuum by two countering effects, virtual quark and virtual gluon production?

This is very slightly mis-stated. There are two countering effects: vacuum polarization by virtual quarks and vacuum polarization by virtual gluons. Quarks have nothing to do with the latter effect.

Spinnor said:
As the strength of the color force is reduced is the reduction in the polarization of the vacuum proportional between virtual quark and virtual gluon polarizations?

Yes. In QCD there is a function of the coupling constant ##g## called the beta function, which summarizes the effects of the vacuum polarization. The most important term in the QCD beta function is

[tex]\beta(g) = -\left(11 - \frac{2}{3}N_f \right) \frac{g^3}{16 \pi^2}[/tex]

The ##11## comes from the vacuum polarization by gluons. The ##-\frac{2}{3}N_f## comes from the vacuum polarization by quarks--##N_f## is the number of quark flavors. You can see that both terms are proportional to ##g^3/16 \pi^2## and so both go to zero as ##g \to 0##, and the ratio between these terms stays constant as ##g \to 0##.
 
  • #3
Spinnor said:
Suppose we consider a proton where we set the electric charge of the three quarks towards zero. At this point I assume we still would have the three quarks bound together?
In which sense? Sum of the three quarks, or each of the quarks individually?
 
  • #4
The_Duck said:
Yes.
Yes; the mass of the proton is of order hbar*c/r where r is the proton radius [at least if you can neglect the rest masses of the quarks themselves; that is, if they each have masses much less than hbar*c/r, which they do in the real world].
This is very slightly mis-stated. There are two countering effects: vacuum polarization by virtual quarks and vacuum polarization by virtual gluons. Quarks have nothing to do with the latter effect.
Yes. In QCD there is a function of the coupling constant ##g## called the beta function, which summarizes the effects of the vacuum polarization. The most important term in the QCD beta function is

[tex]\beta(g) = -\left(11 - \frac{2}{3}N_f \right) \frac{g^3}{16 \pi^2}[/tex]

The ##11## comes from the vacuum polarization by gluons. The ##-\frac{2}{3}N_f## comes from the vacuum polarization by quarks--##N_f## is the number of quark flavors. You can see that both terms are proportional to ##g^3/16 \pi^2## and so both go to zero as ##g \to 0##, and the ratio between these terms stays constant as ##g \to 0##.
Thank you for your help! Looks like I will have to give up on dipole gluon radiation :cry:?

Maybe I just need a space of higher dimensions? Do we still have quark confinement in higher dimensions?

Thanks again!
 
  • #5
snorkack said:
In which sense? Sum of the three quarks, or each of the quarks individually?

Three quarks, ignoring quark electric charge does not change the bound state of the three quarks too much?
 
  • #6
Spinnor said:
Three quarks, ignoring quark electric charge does not change the bound state of the three quarks too much?

Total zero charge for three quarks is a property of neutron.
 
  • #7
Spinnor said:
Thank you for your help! Looks like I will have to give up on dipole gluon radiation :cry:?

Maybe I just need a space of higher dimensions? Do we still have quark confinement in higher dimensions?

I think that if you want to get rid of confinement, you can imagine having ##N_f \ge 17## quark flavors. Then the quantity ##(11 - 2N_f/3)## in the beta function is negative, which means there is no confinement [well, I think you also have to postulate that your quarks are exactly massless, or else confinement reappears at very low energies].
 
  • #8
The_Duck said:
I think that if you want to get rid of confinement, you can imagine having ##N_f \ge 17## quark flavors. Then the quantity ##(11 - 2N_f/3)## in the beta function is negative, which means there is no confinement [well, I think you also have to postulate that your quarks are exactly massless, or else confinement reappears at very low energies].

What happens to confinement if there are over 17 quark flavours, but the quarks are not exactly massless nor close to massless? How low energies would the confinement appear in?

For example suppose that there are in fact 18 flavours of quarks, of which 5 are nearly massless (the known quarks up to beauty), the sixth is 173 GeV (truth) - and the there are 12 more (6 more generations) of quarks, all of which have masses above the observed 173 GeV of truth. But not much more - say, all the 12 quarks have masses between 173 and 200 GeV.

How would large numbers of massive quark flavours affect quark confinement?
What is the currently observed minimum mass of seventh quark?
 
  • #9
The_Duck said:
I think that if you want to get rid of confinement, you can imagine having ##N_f \ge 17## quark flavors. Then the quantity ##(11 - 2N_f/3)## in the beta function is negative, which means there is no confinement [well, I think you also have to postulate that your quarks are exactly massless, or else confinement reappears at very low energies].

That is a lot of flavors! Is that formula dependent on the dimension of space-time?

Thanks for your help!
 
  • #10
Spinnor said:
That is a lot of flavors! Is that formula dependent on the dimension of space-time?

Thanks for your help!
Quantum field theory looks so different in other dimensions I don't know if that formula even exists for a different number of dimensions.

There is confinement for abelian theories in 2 and 3 dimensions according to this, cited at Wikipedia.
 
  • #11
[Deleted since I wrote some stuff I now think is wrong]
 
Last edited:

1. What is Proton e goes to zero?

Proton e goes to zero refers to the concept of the electric charge of a proton becoming zero. This is a hypothetical scenario that has not been observed in nature.

2. What is the significance of a smaller g in relation to Proton e goes to zero?

A smaller g, or the gravitational constant, is related to the strength of the gravitational force between two objects. In the context of Proton e goes to zero, a smaller g would imply a weaker gravitational force between protons, which could have significant implications for the laws of physics.

3. How does vacuum color polarization relate to Proton e goes to zero?

Vacuum color polarization refers to the phenomenon where the electric charge of an object causes the surrounding vacuum to become polarized. This is relevant to Proton e goes to zero as it could potentially affect the electric charge of protons and therefore their behavior.

4. Can Proton e goes to zero be observed in experiments?

No, Proton e goes to zero is a theoretical concept and has not been observed in experiments. It is currently not possible to create conditions where the electric charge of protons can become zero.

5. What are the implications of Proton e goes to zero for our understanding of the universe?

If Proton e goes to zero were to occur, it would challenge our current understanding of the fundamental laws of physics and could potentially lead to the development of new theories and models to explain the behavior of particles and forces in the universe.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
350
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top