Classroom Denomstration of Rotational Kinetic Energy

In summary, there are several ways to demonstrate rotational kinetic energy in a classroom setting. One option is to use a top or a yo-yo, where the conversion of potential energy to rotational kinetic energy can be observed. Another option is to use a horizontally mounted gyroscope with a weight attached to a string, which can show the relationship between the distance the weight drops and the speed of the gyroscope. Additionally, a demonstration of two cars rolling down an inclined plane and along a level surface can illustrate the difference in rotational kinetic energy between objects with wheels and objects without. Finally, the concept of conversion between potential and kinetic energy can also be demonstrated with a mass oscillating on a spring and alternating between translational and rotational kinetic energy.
  • #1
Spoon.
5
0
Is there an amazing way I can demonstrate Rotational Kinetic Energy in a classroom? It's for a presentation and I've looked and thought about some experiments but they involve Angular Momentum which another group has to present/explain.

Sorry if this is in the wrong section, it's my first post : )
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How about bringing a top to class. When you toss a top down, and the top reaches the limit of the string, the potential energy that the top had when it left your hand, along with the linear kinetic energy of the toss has been converted to rotational kinetic energy. That stored kinetic energy is converted back to potential as the top returns to your hand.
 
  • #3
Excuse me.. I meant yo-yo, not top.
 
  • #4
Thanks jimvoit, I might use that one. Any other suggestions?
 
  • #5
Energy is the ability to do work, and it's energy that you've been tasked with. I can't think of a means to demonstrate angular energy without also involving angular momentum.

You could attach a weight to a string that was wrapped by differing amounts around the shaft of a horizontally mounted gyroscope to show a energy relationship between the distance the weight dropped and the speed^2 of the gyroscope, assuming you can figure out a cheap means to measure the rotational speed of the gyroscope.
 
  • #6
Let's see... You could race two round objects down an inclined plane and then along a level surface.

Use say a car with light wheels and an identical car packed in a cardboard cylinder so that the whole thing rolls.

The question is why is the car rolling on its wheels traveling faster.

Point out that since they weigh the same the faster car has more kinetic energy due to its forward motion.

But since both dropped the same height they both got the same amount of potential energy from gravity. What happened to the missing energy in the car rolling inside the cardboard tube?

The answer is of course that part of the energy went into the rotation of the whole car where in the other case only the wheels are rotating...and even though the wheels roll faster they are small so have less rotational kinetic energy.

It would be ideal if you can measure the speeds and do the quantitative calculations on the potential, linear kinetic and rotational kinetic energies. Do you have one of those ultrasound rangers which hook into the TI calculators?

You could make an entire lab out of this after the basic demo.

[PS: To make it perfect let the car carry the cardboard cylinder in the one case. Also if friction comes up point out that (and carefully set things up so that...) there is no sliding so no frictional work is done.]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Do you know how a mass oscillating up and down on a spring illustrates conversion of energy back and forth between potential energy and kinetic energy?

Some springs twist a little bit as they lengthen and contract, which causes the mass to start rotating in an oscillating fashion. With the right combination of spring and mass, there will be times when the kinetic energy is mostly translational (up and down), and so the mass bobs up and down more or less normally. At other times, the kinetic energy is mostly rotational, so the mass twists back and forth around its vertical axis while remaining almost stationary in its vertical motion. The system alternates between the two modes of oscillation. In between, the mass simultaneously bobs up and down while twisting back and forth. The total energy remains constant (ignoring friction): translational kinetic energy + rotational kinetic energy + elastic potential energy of the spring + gravitational potential energy.
 
  • #8
jambaugh said:
Let's see... You could race two round objects down an inclined plane and then along a level surface.

Use say a car with light wheels and an identical car packed in a cardboard cylinder so that the whole thing rolls.

The question is why is the car rolling on its wheels traveling faster.

Point out that since they weigh the same the faster car has more kinetic energy due to its forward motion.

But since both dropped the same height they both got the same amount of potential energy from gravity. What happened to the missing energy in the car rolling inside the cardboard tube?

The answer is of course that part of the energy went into the rotation of the whole car where in the other case only the wheels are rotating...and even though the wheels roll faster they are small so have less rotational kinetic energy.

It would be ideal if you can measure the speeds and do the quantitative calculations on the potential, linear kinetic and rotational kinetic energies. Do you have one of those ultrasound rangers which hook into the TI calculators?

You could make an entire lab out of this after the basic demo.

[PS: To make it perfect let the car carry the cardboard cylinder in the one case. Also if friction comes up point out that (and carefully set things up so that...) there is no sliding so no frictional work is done.]


This is perfect! Thanks jambaugh! Yeah I won't be able to get my hands on one of that ultra sound rangers but the basic demo should be perfect for showing the rotational energy. Thanks again everyone!
 

1. What is rotational kinetic energy?

Rotational kinetic energy is a form of energy that an object possesses due to its rotation around an axis. It is a type of kinetic energy that is associated with the movement of an object in a circular or rotational motion.

2. How is rotational kinetic energy different from linear kinetic energy?

The main difference between rotational and linear kinetic energy is the type of motion. Linear kinetic energy is associated with the movement of an object in a straight line, while rotational kinetic energy is associated with the movement of an object in a circular or rotational motion.

3. What factors affect the amount of rotational kinetic energy in an object?

The amount of rotational kinetic energy in an object is affected by its mass, velocity, and the distance from the axis of rotation. The more mass an object has, the greater its rotational kinetic energy will be. Similarly, the higher the velocity and the farther the object is from the axis of rotation, the more rotational kinetic energy it will have.

4. How can rotational kinetic energy be demonstrated in a classroom?

One way to demonstrate rotational kinetic energy in a classroom is by using a spinning top or a rotating disk. These objects exhibit rotational motion, and their rotational kinetic energy can be calculated by measuring their mass, velocity, and distance from the axis of rotation.

5. What are some real-world applications of rotational kinetic energy?

Rotational kinetic energy is a crucial concept in many real-world applications, such as the spinning of a propeller in an airplane, the rotation of a wind turbine, and the movement of gears in a car engine. It is also important in sports, such as in the spinning of a basketball during a shot or the rotation of a figure skater during a routine.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
889
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
844
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
991
Back
Top